You won't find any recorded scripture with Paul teaching that people should use their time to work for money. What you are doing with Pauls' writings is a distortion, and I think it speaks volumes that you choose to focus on Paul and totally ignore the cornerstone.
Actually, you do find Paul teaching that people should earn a living:
2Th 3:6 Now we command you, brothers, in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that you keep away from any brother who is walking in idleness and not in accord with the tradition that you received from us.
2Th 3:7 For you yourselves know how you ought to imitate us, because we were not idle when we were with you,
2Th 3:8 nor did we eat anyone's bread without paying for it, but with toil and labor we worked night and day, that we might not be a burden to any of you.
2Th 3:9 It was not because we do not have that right, but to give you in ourselves an example to imitate.
2Th 3:10 For even when we were with you, we would give you this command: If anyone is not willing to work, let him not eat.
2Th 3:11 For we hear that some among you walk in idleness, not busy at work, but busybodies.
2Th 3:12 Now such persons we command and encourage in the Lord Jesus Christ to do their work quietly and to earn their own living.
Paul instructed us to imitate him and not to be a burden on anyone and pay for the bread that we eat. He commanded that anyone not doing so should be earning their own living. You are drawing some kind of distinction between Paul and Jesus as if they were teaching two different things, when the teaching and writings of Paul were inspired by the Holy Spirit. Do the Holy Spirit and Jesus disagree or could it be that your interpretation of Matthew 6:24 is inaccurate? Could it be that Matthew 6:24 is not telling us to never work for money but to not make money our idol in place of God?
Paul had trouble with the Corinthians not providing for his physical needs, even though he was shepherding them. He obviously felt uncomfortable about this and decided that he should go get a job working for money to provide for himself, thinking that he should not "burden" them.
He later realized that he'd made a mistake by not rebuking them and teaching them the importance of taking care of one another. THAT is what's recorded in the accounts of Paul's life.
Is this the text you are referring to?
2Co 11:5 Indeed, I consider that I am not in the least inferior to these super-apostles.
2Co 11:6 Even if I am unskilled in speaking, I am not so in knowledge; indeed, in every way we have made this plain to you in all things.
2Co 11:7 Or did I commit a sin in humbling myself so that you might be exalted, because I preached God's gospel to you free of charge?
2Co 11:8 I robbed other churches by accepting support from them in order to serve you.
2Co 11:9 And when I was with you and was in need, I did not burden anyone, for the brothers who came from Macedonia supplied my need. So I refrained and will refrain from burdening you in any way.
2Co 11:10 As the truth of Christ is in me, this boasting of mine will not be silenced in the regions of Achaia.
Do you think that Paul, in defending himself against the accusations of false apostles, was saying he made a mistake and regretted what he did when he pledges to continue doing it in verses 9 and 10? Clearly the statement he makes in verse 7 is ironic and not an admission of sin. He does not regret doing it at all, but vows to continue to work so that he isn't a burden to people and can preach the gospel free of charge. Does Paul not have enough faith to believe that God will supply him with free food if he doesn't work?
The problem, for you, sunny, is that you've become so brainwashed that any time you see the word "work" you automatically associate it with money. Any time you see the word "work" in the Bible, you automatially assume it means for money, against all the context and all reason to the contrary.
John 15:12 "This is my commandment, that you love one another as I have loved you.
I think the problem here is that your preoccupation with this issue causes you to leave the weightier matters, like loving your brother, undone.
Here is a good example, from your post:
Who was Paul even talking to when he wrote this? He was talking to communal churches; groups of Christians who had already forsaken all and were living together. We can see that from Acts 2 and 4.
They were living by faith, working for love. It's a situation which can easily be abused; lazy people who come into a communal setting, thinking that "working for love" means that everyone else has a responsibility to take care of them.
In order to deal with this problem, Paul gave them an extremely good rule; if they don't want to work preaching the gospel or helping others in some practical way, then don't feed them. Eventually, the lazy people leave and all that's left are the red-hot warriors for God; those who really care about ACTING on what Jesus told them to do.
That isn't what the text says. Please read it in full; it says that they should imitate Pauls example by working to pay for their own bread so they wouldn't be a burden, and that they should all earn their own living. You seem to have invented this interpretation and pulled it out of thin air because there is nothing in the verses that support it. If you say that's not true, show us where in 2 Thessalonians 3 that supports that interpretation.
But luke-warm people who want the promises and blessings Jesus talked about, but don't want the discipline or sacrifice. come up with these twisted arguments about how it's really all about money money money money money.
Are you saying I am a luke-warm person who wants the promises and blessing Jesus talked about, but doesn't want the discipline and sacrifice and so I have dreamed up twisted arguments because all I am interested in is money? I love you candle glow, and I say out of love that you should examine what is your heart towards me, because what is coming out of it is hateful. I can guarantee you that Jesus is far more interested in your heart attitude towards me and others who disagree with you rather than who is right about this issue.