Yes, they are hamstrung. That's the problem with trying to argue against an evidence-based scientific theory using unsupported assertions that contradict our best empirical knowledge of the world. Who believes what is basically irrelevant in that situation, the evidence is clear.... evolutionists can claim creationism is not science (which it’s not), yet creationists can’t claim evolution a belief (despite it not being ‘proven’ or ‘absolute truth’ as you even acknowledge). Creationists are hamstrung right out of the gate… don’t you think?
Upvote
0