I never askef you to focus upon his book. I never read it. But does it include the genealogical link between David and Charles?
Well...............Cohen attempts to demonstrate some genealogical links between King David and Charles, but when you read Cohen's work, he only does so in a somewhat loose, incomplete, descriptive way. There are many gaps and holes in the account that he essentially patches with his own bits of rhetoric which don't bring his claims to a demonstrable, concrete conclusion. In fact, in some ways, his thinking is similar to that of Ken Klein, whose book I also have. (And if you saw my book list, you would see one of Ken Klein's books from the 1990s listed at the bottom).
Anyway, that's neither here nor there. I appreciate you finally citing what you specifically wanted us to look at so we can look at it.
And i believe I never said I believe Charles.is the AC.
Maybe not, but Tim Cohen and his charismatic buddies seem to think, and from what I see in some of the podcast Tim Cohen has shown up on, they've swallowed the storyline hook, line and sinker. For the most part, Cohen has cobbled together a number of books and has been putting his prophetic musings out there for the Church (primarily those in the charismatic/faith movement side of things) to buy and consume.
Please try to represent a.person correctly even when hatefully mocking them.
I'm not hatefully mocking Charles. I'm not even mocking Tim Cohen. I mean, who knows? Maybe in the 1,001 claims he's making, some of them are true. But, being that I'm a student of Historiography and the Philosophy of History, I'm going to cite shoddy attempts at writing history (like Cohen's attempts) when and where I see them.
Last but not least, I'm also not mocking you. Don't be so sensitive, and please know that, as a fellow Christian, I appreciate the fact that you want the Lord Jesus to return just as much as any of the rest of us do.
