Anyone else have a unique eschatology?

[2PhiloVoid]

Riddler, or the Joker?

He's likely talking about Rabbi Yosef Dayan-- a modern day claimant and nothing more.

Yeah. I think it was that guy or someone much like him.

 

[dwb001]

Oh, good gravy! ... so you're wanting to talk about some guy over in Israel today who claims that he has a link in lineage to King David?

Not Israel.

I think I've vaguely heard about or read about some particular rabbi over in Israel who, supposedly, fits that claim. But who knows?

Not a rabbi.

And apparently you value "news reports" over Christian books on theology and eschatology. Ok. I see.

For current affairs... yep.

 

[dwb001]

Yeah. I think it was that guy or someone much like him.

Not at all.

 

[2PhiloVoid]

I don't know. How should I?

So you could be wrong. Well, by your prevous "logic," that's about the same as actually being wrong.

 

[Douggg]

I don't know. How should I?

So, no books written about the person being the Antichrist ?

 

[Mr E]

I've grown tired of all this attention-seeking nonsense.

It's immature and unworthy of my time.

Later.

 

[dwb001]

So you could be wrong. Well, by your prevous "logic," that's about the same as actually being wrong.

Yes this person could be the antichrist... maybe not... but I am not saying he is.
Possibly wrong is always a possibility.

But I am just stating facts that a son of god and heir to Davids throne walks the Earth today.
And no this person is not in Israel... although I haven't checked his travel plans lately.

 

[Douggg]

Yes this person could be the antichrist... maybe not... but I am not saying he is.
Possibly wrong is always a possibility.

But I am just stating facts that a son of god and heir to Davids throne walks the Earth today.
And no this person is not in Israel... although I haven't checked his travel plans lately.

So, no books written about the person being the Antichrist ?

 

[2PhiloVoid]

Not at all.

Yeah. See. Here's the deal. If you can't be forthcoming in your details, then I'm going to stick with my "view" [for whatever it's worth as I academically contemplate each day] that Europe is the Beast and see 666 as the typological, literary, prophetic echo of Solomon; 666 being his number and the indicator of the kind of educated corruption that Europe will take, from the time of the Caesars to whatever future time we still have yet to live in God's History.

Babylon, however, is Babylon. And her and the Beast don't quite see eye to eye, just as the last two millennia have shown.

And, I wrap all of that up in a strip of bacon that could just as easily be thrown into the frying pan because, well, it could be wrong.

But you want us to play pin the tail on the donkey using newspaper strips.

 

[dwb001]

So, no books written about the person being the Antichrist ?

Yes there are.
But none of you are showing any sincerity in your inquiries.
I just have a bit more public information then the rest of you... you could find it if you look.

 

[dwb001]

Yeah. See. Here's the deal. If you can't be forthcoming in your details, then I'm going to stick with my "view" [for whatever it's worth as I academically contemplate each day] that Europe is the Beast and see 666 is the typological literary prophetic echo of Solomon; 666 being his number and the indicator of the kind of educated corruption that Europe will take, from the time of the Caesars to whatever future time we still have yet to live in God's History.

Babylon, however, is Babylon. And her and the Beast don't quite see eye to eye, just as the last two millennia have shown.

And, I wrap all of that up in a strip of bacon that could just as easily be thrown into the frying pan because, well, it could be wrong.

But you want us to play pin the tail on the donkey.

No... I want you to show some sincerity about your inquiries.
I thought I was very clear about that. Be sincere and get the answer.
Mock and I will point you to Google to do your own research.

The person really exists as I have described them.

 

[Douggg]

Yes there are.

So name the person to show your sincerity regarding eschatology. You know that the person has to be a Jew to be the heir to Daivid's throne, right ?

 

[dwb001]

So name the person to show your sincerity regarding eschatology.

Pearls before swine.

Show you are serious and you get the name... or you can do your own research.

 

[2PhiloVoid]

No... I want you to show some sincerity about your inquiries.
I thought I was very clear about that. Be sincere and get the answer.
Mock and I will point you to Google to do your own research.

The person really exists as I have described them.

I've been sincere. And all you do is tell us "you guys need to use your brains, go look it up ..."

No, you go read some books! And engage what (and why and how) others also think what they think. Show some fellowship and graciousness in your interaction without the lemon twist you put into it by requiring we all jump through your special Spiritual "hoop."

 

[Douggg]

Pearls before swine.

Show you are serious and you get the name... or you can do your own research.

Don't be ugly. Just name the Jewish person who you think will be the heir to David's throne.

 

[dwb001]

I've been sincere. And all you do is tell us "you guys need to use your brains, go look it up ..."

Because I have not seen sincerity from the other two asking the same question.

No, you go read some books!

Maggoty manna.

And engage what (and why and how) others also think.

Why should I care how others think?

Show some fellowship and graciousness in your interaction without the lemon twist you put into it by requiring we all jump through your special Spiritual "hoop."

The hoop is not spiritual. Sincerity is not a spiritual hoop.
If I give you the name will you promise to do research before excluding this person?
Will you do the homework or will you just laugh and deny the truth of my words?

 

[dwb001]

Don't be ugly. Just name the Jewish person who you think will be the heir to David's throne.

I already said the person is not Jewish.
This post just says you have not read the thread.
You are not taking this seriously at all.

 

[2PhiloVoid]

Because I have not seen sincerity from the other two asking the same question.

Maggoty manna.

Why should I care how others think?

The hoop is not spiritual. Sincerity is not a spiritual hoop.
If I give you the name will you promise to do research before excluding this person?
Will you do the homework or will you just laugh and deny the truth of my words?

Dude. You need to stop with the negative insinuatons and the depracation of others and their intentions and abilities ..................................................

And no, I don't need to know your viewpoint. Mine already has the flexibility to accomodate whatever evil this world will want to produce. I don't have to pin-the-tail-on-the-donkey since I don't really think "the Anti-Christ" is, or ever has been, a specific person any more than Hitler was "the Anti-Christ." Like zombies, they'll just keep coming until God says, "No more."

 

[dwb001]

Dude. You need to stop with the negative insinuatons and the depracation of others and their intentions and abilities

I have not been negative with peoples intentions or abilities.
Please don't lie about me.
You may feel that I am negative about you but that is your own thoughts... not mine.

..................................................

And no, I don't need to know your viewpoint. Mine already has the flexibility to accomodate whatever evil this world will want to produce. I don't have to pin-the-tail-on-the-donkey since I don't really think "the Anti-Christi" is, or ever has been, a specific person any more than Hitler was "the Anti-Christ."

I am not even talking about the antichrist.
Read the thread.
I have not said that I know who the antichrist is.
Do better.

 

[2PhiloVoid]

I have not been negative with peoples intentions or abilities.
Please don't lie about me.
You may feel that I am negative about you but that is your own thoughts... not mine.

I'm not feeling the love from you here, dwb001. I'd like to, though.

I am not even talking about the antichrist.
Read the thread.
I have not said that I know who the antichrist is.
Do better.

Remember that question I asked you yesterday: What is it you'd like to achieve in this thread? I'm still waiting to see you proceed on that answer.

Do better.