There was an earlier thread about women who are not thin mistreating women who are thin.
As a 39-year-old male virgin, I can relate. You know, people implying that my status is due to self-esteem problems, mental illness, pathological shyness, etc. It has even happened in this forum called Christian Forums.
Now I am reading in this thread that, basically, virginity is not a big deal. It's purity that is a big deal, or something like that, people are saying.
If it is not a big deal then why do people feel the need to pathologize a person over it? If it is not a big deal then why do people feel the need to downplay it and point to other things such as "purity"?
In that aforementioned earlier thread the concensus was that the root cause was things like "jealousy" and "insecurity"...
Anyway, nobody has ever given me a rational reason to behave differently. However, I have plenty of rational reasons not to change. You know, things like unwanted pregnancy, venereal diseases, etc.
Sexuality is a very complicated personal and social phenomenon and people's experience with it can be due to countless variables.
All of this virginity vs. purity; "I made a mistake but now I am pure. That's what really matters"; virginity is ideal, but...; "I'm not necessarily waiting until marriage but I am waiting until I am with somebody I am close to emotionally"; etc.; etc. business is extremely oversimplistic, in my humble opinion.
Or am I also going to be judged for not being "pure"? I am sure that my experience--basically, being a male virgin mostly for practical reasons--does not meet any theological idea of "purity".
Upvote
0