No, my job is not to teach people how to use chatbots. It is to do physics.
Because I studied theater and lighting, that is what I studied in Physics. I had a friend who was doing stained glass and was having trouble getting the results he wanted. I had to explain to him the difference between the additive color theory and the subtractive color theory.
Interesting that this is a theory and not fact. Even though this is how our eyes work. This is how photography works. We can not function in the real world if we do not understand how to work with light. There is a medical eye doctor who became a photographer. He does underwater photography. You can see his work in commercials on TV sometimes. Because he has mastered dealing with the way light is affected by water.
In astrophysics, Neil Degrasse believes that the study of light and its behavior can help us to understand the nature of matter and energy, the structure of the universe, and the way that objects move through space.
We know that the Bible makes numerous references to light, both in a literal and metaphorical sense. But for some reason, you want to disregard the Bible and what the Bible tells us about the physics of light. The Bible uses the symbol of light to convey a variety of meanings, including physical illumination, spiritual guidance, and moral truth.
You want to work with "ambivalent light". That is fine to create an effect, but I would not want to live there the way you do because there is so much more to life than that.
The challenge of working with ambivalent light are the subtleties of this type of lighting can be difficult to capture accurately with a camera, and may require careful adjustments to exposure, white balance, and other settings in order to achieve the desired effect.
The results may not be as eye-catching or attention-grabbing as brighter or more dramatic lighting. It is difficult to create images that are visually striking and memorable using ambivalent light.
But if you're happy and content with the mediocre, then carry on.