Another look at the moon landing.

[prodromos]

People who travel around the globe.

Either that, or it's a great name for an international supplier of pigs feet

 

[prodromos]

There's one thing wrong with your post, there are no satellites orbiting space, satellites are used via glorified balloons.

Balloons are blown all around by air currents that change all the time. Satellites follow precise orbits which never change. Your false claim is beyond stupid.

 

[Apple Sky]

I recommend you make certain to link or otherwise reference the source when you post someone else's words. It's a very bad look otherwise.

Not when it's on the top of a google page, how do I know who wrote it ?

 

[Apple Sky]

Balloons are blown all around by air currents that change all the time. Satellites follow precise orbits which never change. Your false claim is beyond stupid.

As is your claim that man has walked on the moon.

 

[Strong in Him]

Not when it's on the top of a google page, how do I know who wrote it ?

I would image that if you had clicked on the link, it would have told you.

Research.
Don't just see a word, a headline or a picture and think "that will do."

 

[Apple Sky]

I would image that if you had clicked on the link, it would have told you.

When I'm searching for something & the page comes up it usually has a statement at the top of the page without a link & this is what I quoted.

As such;

Google Search

 

[Strong in Him]

When I'm searching for something & the page comes up it usually has a statement at the top of the page without a link & this is what I quoted.

When I clicked on the link you provided, it said "AI overview". So the first quote on there was an AI quote.

I'm just saying that your quote would have been attributed to someone/something.

 

[Apple Sky]

When I clicked on the link you provided, it said "AI overview". So the first quote on there was an AI quote.

And this is what I quoted, the AI overview doesn't have a link.

 

[prodromos]

And this is what I quoted, the AI overview doesn't have a link.

Then you need to state it is an AI overview. Otherwise how is @Aaron112 supposed to know it is the output of one of those godless man made constructs.

 

[Kathleen30]

There is absolutely no evidence of a mass (in the millions) deception. There is no testimony under oath that NASA faked the lunar landings. The proof though is absolute that they indeed landed in the moon. The telemetry signal from the Apollo missions was not encrypted so thousands of scientists and amateurs alike were tracking the mission Including the Russians. We are talking about a global network of independent observers. All of these track a signal coming from the moon not a signal coming from earth. This would have been easy to determine.

Secondly, crossing the Van Allen Belt takes 53 minutes not 6 hours. The Apollo astronauts crossed it at ballistic speeds, with shielding, and at the weaker, upper portion. All crewed missions from Apollo 8 to Apollo 17 crossed the Van Allen belt.

Yes it takes around hour from what I’ve read. Your site says 57 minutes. But close to two hours if passing through.the belts the long way .The Inner belt 12000 kilometres or 7500 miles. Outer belt 58000 kilometres or 35000 Miles’s. Complete total 70,000 kilometres or 42,500 miles. So taking the quickest route on their alleged journey through the belts at 24 or 25 thousand miles a hour comes to around a hour inside the belt

Hentenza that may seem like good value at first but you still flying through a highly charged radiation zone. Doesn’t matter if the area that they went through is a little weaker in radiation the reality is that you are still submerged in a sea of radiation and not in a sea of love for a good Hour. Now of those 6 Apollo missions that went through. Not one of those crews suffered any radiation effects. You may say good luck . But luck has limits 6 times Lady Luck did smile upon the Apollo missions ? I do swollow. But I’m not swallowing that . Says to me that they never went though the Van Ellen’s belt and the very reason for no radioactive sickness or contamination or death with any of the crews. And passing their medical with a clean bill of health upon return.

You then bring up the matter of deception. You claim no deception to see here. Hentenza we live in a world of decption. Nations and people have practiced deception for thousands of years . Actually the Bible tells us the whole world lies in wickedness and deceit . The Bible also says that the God shall give many over to strong delusions. So I would think some more deeply on that. Hentenza you did mention telemetry data. As far as me know NASA lost all their telemetry data. And would have solved a lot of problems one way or the other. Kathleen

 

[prodromos]

Yes it takes around hour from what I’ve read. Your site says 57. But close to two hours if passing through.the belts the long. Inner belt 12000 kilometres or 7500 miles. Outer belt 58000 kilometres or 35000 Miles’s. Complete total 70,000 kilometres or 42500 miles. So taking the the quickest route on their alleged journey through the belts at 24 or 25 thousand comes to around a hour inside the belt View attachment 371424 Hentenza that may seem like good value at first but you still flying through a highly charged radiation zone. Doesn’t if the area that went through is little weaker the reality is that you are still submerged in a sea of radiation and not in a sea of love for a good Hour. Now of those 6 Apollo missions that went through not one of those crews suffer any radiation effects. You may say good luck . But luck has limits 6 times Lady Luck did smile upon the Apollo missions ? I do swollow. But I’m not swallowing that . Says to me that they never went though the Van Ellen’s belt and the very reason for no radioactive sickness or contamination or death with any of the crews passing their medical with a clean bill of health upon return. View attachment 371424 You then bring up the matter of deception. You clam no deception to see here. Hentenza we live in a world of decption. Nations and people have practiced for thousands of years . Actually the tells us the whole world lies in wickedness and deceit . The Bible also says that the God shall give many over to strong delusions. So I would think some more deeply on that. Hentenza you did mention telemetry data as far as Ifar as me recollects NASA lost all their telemetry data. Would have solved a lot of problems one way or the other. Kathleen

Kathleen, if the astronauts didn't go to the moon, then who left those retro reflectors up there on the moon's surface?

 

[Kathleen30]

Kathleen, if the astronauts didn't go to the moon, then who left those retro reflectors up there on the moon’s off the surface?

Prodomus as far I know we’ve been bouncing lasers off the moon from the early 60’s long before the Apollo missions and the alleged lasers on the moon saw light of day. Actually the American military has a way to Communicate with bouncing signals off the moon also in certain situations . I can’t remember how they do but they have.

 

[Apple Sky]

Then you need to state it is an AI overview. Otherwise how is @Aaron112 supposed to know is is the output of one of those godless man made constructs.

So you thought you could pull the plagiarism stunt on me again. Better luck next time.

 

[prodromos]

Prodomus

Pro dro mos.
It is the Greek word meaning "forerunner" and is a reference to John the Baptist, after whom I was named.
Its even right there in the top corner when you reply to my post, yet you consistently misspell it either deliberately or out of carelessness.

as far I know we’ve been bouncing lasers off the moon from the early 60’s long before the Apollo missions

Only a few years before the Apollo missions. The installation of retroreflectors on the lunar surface greatly increased the accuracy of those measurements.

Lunar Laser Ranging experiments - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

and the alleged lasers on the moon saw light of day

I assume you mean the reflectors. There are no lasers on the moon, alleged or otherwise

Actually the American military has a way to Communicate with bouncing signals off the moon also in certain situations . I can’t remember how do but they have that too.

Radio signals, not lasers. Amateur radio operators continue to use this technique today

Earth–Moon–Earth communication - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[prodromos]

So you thought you could pull the plagiarism stunt on me again. Better luck next time.

 

[Apple Sky]

Don't pretend you don't know what I'm on about.

 

[prodromos]

Don't pretend you don't know what I'm on about.

All I said was you need to give the source of something if it is not your own words. It was obvious to everyone who is familiar with your posts, that you were not the author of what you posted. It is simply bad form to not cite where you got it from.

 

[Apple Sky]

All I said was you need to give the source of something if it is not your own words. It was obvious to everyone who is familiar with your posts, that you were not the author of what you posted. It is simply bad form to not cite where you got it from.

Okay, if I REMEMBER.

 

[Kathleen30]

Pro dro mos.
It is the Greek word meaning "forerunner" and is a reference to John the Baptist, after whom I was named.
Its even right there in the top corner when you reply to my post, yet you consistently misspell it either deliberately or out of carelessness.

Only a few years before the Apollo missions. The installation of retroreflectors on the lunar surface greatly increased the accuracy of those measurements.

Lunar Laser Ranging experiments - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

I assume you mean the reflectors. There are no lasers on the moon, alleged or otherwise

Radio signals, not lasers. Amateur radio operators continue to use this technique today

Earth–Moon–Earth communication - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Prodromus firstly NASA knows exactly where the sites of their alleged lunar lunar landings be. They simply punch in those coordinates and you have your laser hit . And your return signal .Dosnt mean anything. And certainly no evidence of reflectors being there . As I wrote prior they have been bouncing lasers off the moon for a good 10 yrs without the need of any reflectors. It’s just an ingenious way to say that we’ve been to the moon when they haven’t. My apologies with your name sometimes the auto memory clicks in and changes your name to a past mistake and I not notice. Yes reflectors me meant and not laser. But with your other statement when you mention radio signals I did not mention lasers but wrote signals . Now the sleep time. Good nite

 

[d taylor]

-
​

The science community is one, one in deceiving people that they can do something that man can not actually do. Also in deceiving people about God's creation.

Now the whole earth had one language and one speech. And it came to pass, as they journeyed from the east, that they found a plain in the land of Shinar, and they dwelt there. Then they said to one another, “Come, let us make bricks and bake them thoroughly.” They had brick for stone, and they had asphalt for mortar. And they said, “Come, let us build ourselves a city, and a tower whose top is in the heavens; let us make a name for ourselves, lest we be scattered abroad over the face of the whole earth.”
But the Lord came down to see the city and the tower which the sons of men had built. And the Lord said, “Indeed the people are one and they all have one language, and this is what they begin to do; now nothing that they propose to do will be withheld from them. Come, let Us go down and there confuse their language, that they may not understand one another’s speech.” So the Lord scattered them abroad from there over the face of all the earth, and they ceased building the city. Therefore its name is called Babel, because there the Lord confused the language of all the earth; and from there the Lord scattered them abroad over the face of all the earth.