Another look at the moon landing.

[Apple Sky]

And what about that fake moon rock that was given the given to the prime minister of the Netherlands by Neil Armstrong ?

Examination of the rock was verified to actually be a forgery, It turned out to be a piece of petrified wood.

 

[prodromos]

Yes, so where is your evidence that Dean was lying ? If it's that video about the football field your wrong.

How am I wrong?

 

[Apple Sky]

why say that the field was flat when it wasn't?

Why wouldn't he, it's what I would have said.

 

[Apple Sky]

How am I wrong?

See post above.

 

[Apple Sky]

Even more proof of the Moon landing fraud is the fact that, according to NASA itself, all of the blueprints of the hypothetically miraculous technologically advanced hardware that allegedly put a man on the Moon on the very first attempt in 1969, were deliberately destroyed after the supposed missions, as was all of the technical specifications of the spacecraft, along with all of the flight data that recorded the spacecraft's actual location during the missions.

You would think that such, one-of-a-kind, supremely valuable and expensive designs with all of their irreplaceable data, would be kept for just short of all of eternity, both as a record of the achievement and in case such costly to attain information and equipment would be needed again to return to the Moon.

Yet the exact opposite is true.

Imagine Bill Gates spending $200 billion to build the first computer, and then once successfully completing it, throwing the computer and its blueprints into a furnace. Would anyone ever do such a crazy thing? Of course not. Yet this is exactly what NASA did with its "amazing Moon travel technology" that worked flawlessly on the very first try. This is proof itself that the Apollo missions were fraudulent,

 

[David Lamb]

Why wouldn't he, it's what I would have said.

If the flatness or curvature of the football field had nothing to do with what he was talking about, why even mention it? However, the curvature of the field explains why, as the man walked away from the camera, his legs disappeared. Dean said this was caused by perspective, but perspective would make the whole man appear smaller. It wouldn't cause his legs to disappear while the rest of him was still in full view. It is similar to what you have sometimes said about sunset being caused by perspective. Again, it isn't, because the sun doesn't appear small and smaller as it sets, but fraction by fraction, it disappears below the horizon.

 

[Apple Sky]

If the flatness or curvature of the football field had nothing to do with what he was talking about, why even mention it? However, the curvature of the field explains why, as the man walked away from the camera, his legs disappeared. Dean said this was caused by perspective, but perspective would make the whole man appear smaller. It wouldn't cause his legs to disappear while the rest of him was still in full view.

I would have to watch the video again to comment do you have a link ?

 

[Strong in Him]

Why wouldn't he, it's what I would have said.

Why wouldn't he lie, you mean?

 

[Strong in Him]

Yet this is exactly what NASA did with its "amazing Moon travel technology" that worked flawlessly on the very first try.

It was not the very first try; you have already been told this more than once.

The link that I posted before was a list of all space missions from about late 1950. Many of them failed - they kept trying until they succeeded.
I can't repost it from my tablet - Google it.

 

[David Lamb]

I would have to watch the video again to comment do you have a link ?

Yes, it is in Post 222 of this thread: Flat Earthers: What They Believe and Why

 

[Apple Sky]

Yes, it is in Post 222 of this thread: Flat Earthers: What They Believe and Why

Thank you for this but I don't have the time to search through this video for one little clip.
Can't you just find the clip and link it ?

 

[Apple Sky]

It was not the very first try; you have already been told this more than once.

The link that I posted before was a list of all space missions from about late 1950. Many of them failed - they kept trying until they succeeded.
I can't repost it from my tablet - Google it.

 

[prodromos]

Why wouldn't he,

because it isn't true.

it's what I would have said.

Then you would also be lying.

 

[Strong in Him]

Thank you for this but I don't have the time to search through this video for one little clip.
Can't you just find the clip and link it ?

He just has!

 

[Apple Sky]

Then you would also be lying.

Not knowing any different, no I would not be lying.

 

[prodromos]

See post above.

You didn't give any explanation of how I am wrong. In the video, Dean claims that the person is not disappearing due to the curvature of the playing field when in fact the person is disappearing due to the curvature of the playing field. Dean claims, "that's how our eyes work" when in fact that is not how our eyes work. Dean makes multiple false claims in the clip. Making false claims is lying, and when someone corrected him, he took offence that someone would dare question him as an 'elder'.

 

[Apple Sky]

He just has!

I mean the exact clip, the video in question is far too long to go through to find it.

 

[prodromos]

Not knowing any different, no I would not be lying.

He was informed of his 'error' shortly after his debate, so even if he thought it was flat then, he knows better now, but he has not removed the clip or posted an apology or a retraction. He has left the video unchanged on his website without any amendation or commentary. Thus he perpetuates falsehood.

 

[prodromos]

I mean the exact clip, the video in question is far too long to go through to find it.

The link in that post takes you straight to that part of the video. Perhaps it is a problem with your computer.

 

[Apple Sky]

He was informed of his 'error' shortly after his debate, so even if he thought it was flat then, he knows better now, but he has not removed the clip or posted an apology or a retraction. He has left the video unchanged on his website without any amendation or commentary. Thus he perpetuates falsehood.

And why should he ?