Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I am not American, so I know nothing about the deep underground bases. However, how does their construction provide evidence against the moon landings?It’s 2025, our government just spent 21 trillion on deep underground bases. I think they could afford to do what they did in the 60’s. They never went.
One of the excuses is that we can’t afford to go to the moon again. It’s too expensive.I am not American, so I know nothing about the deep underground bases. However, how does their construction provide evidence against the moon landings?
Not being able to afford to go there and not being able to go there because it's impossible, the moon can't be walked on or God would prevent it, are very different things.One of the excuses is that we can’t afford to go to the moon again. It’s too expensive.
God's word says nothing about moon landings.
But not that it can't be landed on or that God will never allow it.But it does say stuff about the moon.
Well if you would rather walk on a Mars bar than eat it, you need prayer; that's all I can say!
Yes, I understand that about not going again. I thought you were saying that nobody went the first time(s).One of the excuses is that we can’t afford to go to the moon again. It’s too expensive.
But not that it can't be landed on or that God will never allow it.
You trust a YouTube video over the word of a fellow Christian. What more is there to say?The video gives the reasons why that had to stage the moon walks here on earth, I guess God put a spanner in their works.
Having the money to spend is one thing. Being able to justify the spending as well as the risk is another, especially when there is no benefit, material or otherwise, from spending that money.It’s 2025, our government just spent 21 trillion on deep underground bases. I think they could afford to do what they did in the 60’s. They never went.
Well of course you do. You have a track record of taking the word of proven liers over the word of other Christians.I have to disagree.
Having the money to spend is one thing. Being able to justify the spending as well as the risk is another, especially when there is no benefit, material or otherwise, from spending that money.
The first mission that reached the moon only allowed a tiny portion of the lunar soil to be sampled. That would be like explorers landing at the edge of a desert and deciding that the rest of the continent must be desert too on the basis of that one tiny sample.Surely they would have known there were no benefits to be gained from the moon on their first supposed mission to the moon, why go back several times more ?
The first mission that reached the moon only allowed a tiny portion of the lunar soil to be sampled. That would be like explorers landing at the edge of a desert and deciding that the rest of the continent must be desert too on the basis of that one tiny sample.
I'm guessing about 6 timesAnd how many supposed missions did it take to realize that they couldn't benefit from the moon ?
No. There is no telescope powerful enough to discern objects on the moon's surface from earth.And would someone be able to observe them thorough a strong enough telescope ?
I'm guessing about 6 times
No. There is no telescope powerful enough to discern objects on the moon's surface from earth.
The first mission that reached the moon only allowed a tiny portion of the lunar soil to be sampled. That would be like explorers landing at the edge of a desert and deciding that the rest of the continent must be desert too on the basis of that one tiny sample.
Your opinion regarding the lunar missions isn't worth a hill of beans.Looks all the same to me from their phony videos & images.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?