Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Yes I did in this case. I know soldiers wear dog tags, but for some reason I was thinking the issue concerned the tags that K-9's wear also - because they do. I regret making this inference but it doesn't change the post's separation of church and state issue, be it with service dogs or service personnel.You thought that dog tags were tags they put on dogs?
Which gods and religions would you exclude from
dog tags? ( they are federally funded, your money
IF you pay taxes.)
Is there any religion frim which you want freedom?
The old Aztec human sacrifice one, say?
Any prob with yiur taxes going tomsupport / spread it?
There are about 6,000 Muslims in the US military. So you'd be fine if they display quotes from the Koran as part of their jobs. There are over 24,000 native American and Alaskan personnel in the military. Why shouldn't they also express their beliefs openly on their insignia? And the same should apply to the 8,000 to 10,000 Jewish servicemen and women. Who might want to wear the Star of David on their uniforms. The same would apply to Hindu personnel. We live in a multicultural, multireligious society. Things get compilcated.
We don't inhabit the same worldI assume the religious dog tags in question, whether being bought for people or dogs, are being purchased privately. Why? My own 30 years of Federal service and knowledge of our secular environment considers it unfathomable that any Federal government agency would purchase obvious religious items for official use.
As personal items, if a higher court rules that religious dog tags are allowed by the U.S. Constitution's First Amendment freedom of religion clause, then all religions would be protected, not just Christianity.
Personally, I want freedom from all false religions since they offend both God and me, but as a Christian and American who believes in the First Amendment as interpreted by the Foundng Fathers who wrote it, I tolerate the presence of false religions and respect an individual's right to follow them so long as they don't hurt others by their actions.
Now here's a final response to your last question that will certainly draw oppostion from those here who don't respect our nation's Christian heritage. Written documents firmly demonstrate that our Founding Fathers established America as a Repubic based upon Christian beliefs and Biblical moral values. The Federal government supported the Christian religion extensively, starting with its first act of funding production of a new American Bible, establishing a juresprudence system based upon the Bible, and establishing a public school system for the purpose of reading the Bible. Understand also that many of the States had designated churches that were actually funded by the governments. There was no Constitutional separation of church and state as interpreted today until Hugo Black's Supreme Court Ruling in 1947 where he misinterpreted and canonized Jefferson's phrase.
Yes, I would support government/public funds being spent to advance the Christian faith as was done for the first 300 years of our nation. Sadly, I recognize that our society has turned it's back on having God's hand in the nation's affairs, as well as embracing Christianity and Biblical moral values. I believe America's on a downward spiral, and reclaiming our Christian heritage is the only thing that will save it.
Dogs tags are for military personnel. Not actual dogs.
Wait, I’m confused now.
Again, this has nothing to do with uniform regulations or what anyone (soldier, civilian, or canine) is permitted to wear. The point of contention is a company selling merchandise (which happens to be dog tags) displaying licensed US military logos alongside bible verses. The government worries that this could be seen as an official endorsement of a religion, which would violate the 1st Amendment.I assume the religious dog tags in question, whether being bought for people or dogs, are being purchased privately. Why? My own 30 years of Federal service and knowledge of our secular environment considers it unfathomable that any Federal government agency would purchase obvious religious items for official use.
Thanks for the info!Dogs used by the military are actually considered military personnel (non-commissioned officers), and a higher rank than their handler. They are even sometimes given military funerals and other honors.
All religious jewelry worn by military personnel must be conservative and discrete. The dogs also aren't the property of the soldiers they work with.
Ah, to be the dog-Walker at the Pentagon, what a job!Dogs used by the military are actually considered military personnel (non-commissioned officers), and a higher rank than their handler. They are even sometimes given military funerals and other honors.
All religious jewelry worn by military personnel must be conservative and discrete. The dogs also aren't the property of the soldiers they work with.
Again, this has nothing to do with uniform regulations or what anyone (soldier, civilian, or canine) is permitted to wear. The point of contention is a company selling merchandise (which happens to be dog tags) displaying licensed US military logos alongside bible verses. The government worries that this could be seen as an official endorsement of a religion, which would violate the 1st Amendment.
So you believe that because the dogs belong to the US government, (which I don't dispute), that they cannot be allowed to put religious symbols on government property?The service animals are not the private property of the soldiers who handle them. They belong to the US government. Putting religioius slogans on these dogs is no different (and equally prohibited) as painting religious slogans on the general's jeep.
MRFF very well understand the First Amendment and its promise of separation of religion and government. That is what they are defending.
I would hope that the religious people of all faiths would see the problem in using government resources to promote your religion and violate the religious freedom of others.
I would suggest you start by reading the thread, where you will learn that you're completely off-base and that this has absolutely nothing to do with dogs or what soldiers are permitted to wear.how would you propose to solve this dilemma then?
Dogs don't have religions. The dog handlers don't have the right to use them for expressing their religion. (That is not the actual story.)So you believe that because the dogs belong to the US government, (which I don't dispute), that they cannot be allowed to put religious symbols on government property?
I have never seen a soldier wearing a cross on their uniform except chaplains.Then you also believe that soldiers themselves should not be allowed to wear the symbol of their faith on their persons.
I have served my country in the army.
If, when they told me " you are now the property of the united states government", that I also would not be allowed to wear a cross, i would have bailed.
There is no dilemma. The company will not be permitted to use DOD insignia on their religious products.how would you propose to solve this dilemma then?
Aren't dog tags typically hidden under clothing? My understanding is that their purpose is to help identify military personnel who are killed or wounded in action. In order to identify fallen soldiers, for instance, medics search for dog tags under the wearer's shirt etc. Having regulations regarding shape, material, colors, and obscene images makes sense to me. Nothing to draw attention away from the uniform aesthetic in case they're exposed. However, I don't see how having a little symbol or inspirational quote engraved on the tag, depicting the wearer's religious beliefs or lack thereof, harms anyone. It's not like we're talking about a patch or a medal. I imagine that's how this went uncontested for 20 years without issue. Dog tags are not on public display.
Military personnel put their lives on the line to defend our freedoms. They are allowed to have personal religious beliefs or lack thereof. As a taxpayer, it's no skin off my back if somebody wants to wear custom dog tags that reflect their own religious or cultural affiliations. Christian, Muslim, Jew, Atheist, or other. It is a private item that is worn under the uniform and close to the heart.
Point of reference:
There are military members in my family, but I've never seen their dog tags. It isn't something I've asked to see. I have no idea if theirs have religious symbols or inspirational quotes because this item is worn under clothing and they haven't brought up the subject.
US government issued dog tags are stamped with the full name of the soldier, social security/DOD number, blood type, and religious affiliation. Below are what mine issued by the US Army look like.There are military members in my family, but I've never seen their dog tags. It isn't something I've asked to see. I have no idea if theirs have religious symbols or inspirational quotes because this item is worn under clothing and they haven't brought up the subject.
No, soldiers don't wear crosses embroidered on their uniforms, but there have been many instances where Christian soldiers have been put in a position where they have had to stand up for their faith or face repercussions in the military, and if I wanted to wear a cross on my uniform, they shouldn't have any say in the matter. The Constitution says freedom OF religion, not freedom FROM religion!!!!As previously noted, the OP got the article wrong and part of the responses in the thread are in response to that error. The article was about merchandise sold with service branch insignia and religious themes that implied the DOD endorsed a particular religion. It does not.
Now I will respond to your post as written.
Dogs don't have religions. The dog handlers don't have the right to use them for expressing their religion. (That is not the actual story.)
I have never seen a soldier wearing a cross on their uniform except chaplains.
There is no dilemma. The company will not be permitted to use DOD insignia on their religious products.
US government issued dog tags are stamped with the full name of the soldier, social security/DOD number, blood type, and religious affiliation. Below are what mine issued by the US Army look like.
View attachment 351105
The Navy, Marine Corps, and Coast Guard also include the branch of service, and the Marine Corps also includes gas mask size. Anything else printed or stamped on dog tags, such as religious symbols or inspirational quotes, would be prohibited.
Matthew 6:6-7: But when you pray, go away by yourself, shut the door behind you, and pray to your Father in private. Then your Father, who sees everything, will reward you....many of you almost sound like you think the government should have the right to tell a soldier what he can and cannot worship!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?