I figured it could stay as a read-only archive.Will it be read only or when it completely go away?
Directly calling another poster a racist falls under the flaming rule. Please report any such posts.all I want to know is are you all going to handle the problem of individuals calling other individuals raciest? That is something that should be on your long list of rules.
Those are flames and should be reported so that we can handle them.all I want to know is are you all going to handle the problem of individuals calling other individuals raciest? That is something that should be on your long list of rules.
Yes, anyone can report flames again, but flames don't directly result in bans anymore.I agree with eastcoast on this.
Also, did they change the rule back to anyone can report anyone on any post again? I think I seen that recently. I’m not on here very much anymore to keep up.
Pretty sure in light of these changes I will be banned soon. When that happens know that you’re all in my prayers continually.
Oh Lord. So many people would have been banned out of here if all the "you're racist" posts had been reported.Those are flames and should be reported so that we can handle them.
That would be on them.Oh Lord. So many people would have been banned out of here if all the "you're racist" posts had been reported.
Those are flames and should be reported so that we can handle them.
No. You can't because its still a flamming subjective opinion. You need to stop with the flamming.Can you say that a view someone expresses is a racist view? Like if someone literally said that white people were superior to other races, would calling that view racist be flaming the person?
No. You can't because its still a flamming subjective opinion. You need to stop with the flamming.
Saying "that's a racist view" isn't a flame because it addresses the subject of the post, not the other poster personally. Saying "you're a racist" is a flame because it's directed at the other poster persinally.Can you say that a view someone expresses is a racist view? Like if someone literally said that white people were superior to other races, would calling that view racist be flaming the person?
Saying "that's a racist view" isn't a flame because it addresses the subject of the post, not the other poster personally. Saying "you're a racist" is a flame because it's directed at the other poster persinally.
And if the view isn't? They need to add- in their opinion.Saying "that's a racist view" isn't a flame because it addresses the subject of the post, not the other poster personally. Saying "you're a racist" is a flame because it's directed at the other poster persinally.
That's fine, too.And if the view isn't? They need to add- in their opinion.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?