• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

And the best country to live in is ...

wpiman2

Senior Member
Oct 6, 2007
2,778
61
Godless Massachusetts
✟25,751.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Libertarian
On the contrary. The Dep. of Education plays down the illiteracy rates in order to justify their existence & funding. The actual rates are even worse.

Afraid your dead wrong; I know people that work there and their mandate is to find and fund studies highlighting the need for more federal intervention into education. Self preservation.

You probably know as much about the US Department of Education as I know about the Sweedish and Finnish national education system; which is zero.
 
Upvote 0

Kalevalatar

Supisuomalainen sisupussi
Jul 5, 2005
5,468
904
Pohjola
✟27,827.00
Country
Finland
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Afraid your dead wrong;

That I sure am. On purpose. I fashioned my pseudo-argument to be as silly as your original argument.

But back to your previous post.

A better and less partial view is in the CIA fact book. 99% literacy rate for the US; 100% for Norway.

https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/fields/2103.html

100% vs. 99%.

Which was exactly my initial argument, straight from the very same CIA World Factbook, here:

Norway knows no illiteracy, whereas 1% of the US populace cannot read and write.


Fellow poster SpritualAntiseptic, however, was trying very hard to argue against this 100% vs. 99% difference:


 
Upvote 0

wpiman2

Senior Member
Oct 6, 2007
2,778
61
Godless Massachusetts
✟25,751.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Libertarian

I don't think that anyone would disagree that the educational system for the Nordic countries is better for the overall population that in the US. The US though has the best universities in the world; hands down.


It is somewhat wasteful however, to have spent resources educating people who are going to drive trucks for a living and aspire to nothing more.
 
Upvote 0

Kalevalatar

Supisuomalainen sisupussi
Jul 5, 2005
5,468
904
Pohjola
✟27,827.00
Country
Finland
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
I don't think that anyone would disagree that the educational system for the Nordic countries is better for the overall population that in the US. The US though has the best universities in the world; hands down.

Absolutely. The US and UK. And you know what? Just so happens the brand new rankings are just in, fresh from the press :

Times Higher Education-QS World University Rankings 2009

Top 200 world universities



It was kind of boohoo news here in Finland that the only Finnish university on that list, the Helsinki University, went down from 91 to 108.

I mean, seriously. We are 5 million people. We have but a handful of Universities between us. Helsinki University made it to that top 200 list, not that it even matters; Helsinki would still be the top destination for the 5 million or so Finnish speakers, what with the almost non-existent worldwide competition and all...
 
Upvote 0
T

Tenka

Guest
Kalevalatar said:
Yeah, but Helsinki?? Better than Sydney?!? Please. That has to be a mistake. Seriously. Helsinki is bland, windy, and boooooring-to-tears.
And I think Sydney is filthy, has shocking house prices and awful public transport. Everywhere I've been in Japan was better than Sydney.
Absolutely. The US and UK. And you know what? Just so happens the brand new rankings are just in, fresh from the press :
wow, Australia got 8 in the top 100, that's pretty good. I think we only have something like 40 Universities.
 
Upvote 0
S

SpiritualAntiseptic

Guest
Quite right. The point remains the same: zero (0).

Actually, the point remains the same, the GDP for Norway is distorted by a factor of 1:1.5 in terms of CPI with the US.




The study does not say that 87% are illiterate. It is talking about very particular literacy skills. I have never met anyone that was illiterate... and I have seen very, very poor and very, very rural.

The US does have a good deal of people that don't have good literacy skills. However, if you are going to say that Norway has a 100% literacy rate based, based on the same system, the US has >99%.

That indicates a major faillure for the US education systems.

I think you should work in the US education system for a while, you'll find out that the failure is with the culture and the parents, not the teachers. (and I say this as one that does NOT think highly of our teachers)

I wish you would take your own advice and familiarize yourself with the OP report.

I am wondering if you are just arguing for the sake of arguing at this point. You just disproved your own claims. First you said that the US has a ~86% literacy rate and then made the baseless claim that this lag was the cause of it's low ranking.
1) The US couldn't be at #13 in literacy with an 86% literacy rate.
2) The ranking the US received can't have anything to do with a 'lag' in education/literacy when its overall ranking is almost the same as the one it has in literacy.


Norway, however, does offer the best quality life to all Norwegians, not just for the priveleged upper crust.

As does the United States.
 
Upvote 0
S

SpiritualAntiseptic

Guest
For unskilled labour - about 75% of the workforce - wages have stagnated or declined. There are several good studies on this.

That is simply not true, I just posted the minimum wage, which is the ultimate form of 'unskilled labor'. Changes in minimum wage affect wages and salaries in the general work force. The minimum wage has consistantly outpaced the inflation rate and the consumer price index.
 
Upvote 0

Maren

Veteran
Oct 20, 2007
8,709
1,659
✟72,368.00
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Private
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/01/2001-2005_imm_rate_US.PNG

Must be why the US gets 1 to 1.5 million immigrants a year.

I didn't say it wasn't better than the countries around it, I said that I doubt you can support that most in the world think it is the best place to live. Notice that the greatest "sending countries" are closest to the US and so they pick the US as the closest that is good, not that it is necessarily the best -- so they come to the US due to geography rather than thinking the US is the best.
 
Upvote 0

exotic walrus

Well-Known Member
Aug 11, 2009
502
34
Australia
✟814.00
Faith
Atheist

This isn't even up for debate in an economics course. Profits have soared while wages have stagnated or declined - it is approaching a four decade trend now.

 
Upvote 0
S

SpiritualAntiseptic

Guest
Profits have soared while wages have stagnated or declined

I just showed that wages have increased. There is no way you can say wages are stagnant (and certainly not in decline) when the minimum wage has continued to increase, above the rate of inflation and CPI.

The minimum wage in 1989 was $3.35.

According to the US Department of Labor, $3.35 in 1989 is worth $5.83 today. In 1999, it was $5.15 ($6.67 today)

That means the minimum wage in 2009 dollars, has gone from $5.83 in 1989 to $6.67 in 1999 to $7.25 in 2009.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Kalevalatar

Supisuomalainen sisupussi
Jul 5, 2005
5,468
904
Pohjola
✟27,827.00
Country
Finland
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Actually, the point remains the same, the GDP for Norway is distorted by a factor of 1:1.5 in terms of CPI with the US.





Look, it is not the end of the world. After all, it is not like the United States of America ranked last in this year's Human Development Index or something. 13th place is still a perfectly decent ranking.
 
Upvote 0
S

SpiritualAntiseptic

Guest
Look, it is not the end of the world. After all, it is not like the United States of America ranked last in this year's Human Development Index or something. 13th place is still a perfectly decent ranking.

My posts have nothing to do with me caring about the US ranking in the UN index, only what was said here about it. If you want to back out of the baseless claims you made, then don't post. Don't be condescending and attempt to portray my responses to what you said as some jingoist defense.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Kalevalatar

Supisuomalainen sisupussi
Jul 5, 2005
5,468
904
Pohjola
✟27,827.00
Country
Finland
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private

Oh, goodie. Then it is not just about the United States of America's ranking. What other countries on that list you feel have been treated unfairly and given too low a ranking due to their unfavorable currency exchange rates, mistaken illiteracy figures, higher bar for literacy and all that? Which countries you think deserve the top places?
 
Upvote 0

canukian

Well-Known Member
Jan 23, 2009
2,752
110
canada
✟3,428.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
CA-Conservatives
Code:
And many more of them end up digging ditches for a living... it all actually kind of evens out.

i saw a documenery on india. the poor went to a dry riverbed in summer to smash rocks together. they made gravel and draged it to town to sell it by the ton. small kids pitched in. would they like to come to america to become rich, by digging ditches? or get really rich? you have no clue what america is.
 
Upvote 0

canukian

Well-Known Member
Jan 23, 2009
2,752
110
canada
✟3,428.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
CA-Conservatives
Upvote 0
S

SpiritualAntiseptic

Guest

I JUST SAID: My posts have nothing to do with me caring about the US ranking in the UN index

Did you actually read any of my posts? The only issue I had was the subjectivity of the index (which was a western, materialistic approach that claims to find "quality of life"). The topics that you mention in your post were things YOU brought up, not me. I was responding to the claims YOU and OTHERS made.

You basically made a bunch of nonsense claims about the US- which I showed were wrong and now you are telling me that the debate here is my personal issues with the UN ranking. YOU brought up the skewed GDP, YOU brought up the literacy rates, etc. I carefully pointed out how your comments/arguments were not only flawed, but illogical. Now you are running off on a rhetorical tangent, telling me that I am upset about the US ranking. This has been about what you posted.

Just to make this perfectly clear before you try and revise the debate once again: I wasn't complaining about the index- which is why I can't answer your last question. Quality of life is shaped by the culture and determined by the individual. You simply can't rank countries. I can not tell you what country or countries have the best quality of life.

Anyone that thinks there country has a "high quality of life" over others is clueless.
 
Upvote 0