oK lets give this a try ... I would appreciate if your advice works I am trying it now. .. (see if it works)
A lot better. You can still go one step further. Use the "reply" button, as you normally would. That brings up the whole quoted post, complete with poster reference, in your text box. Leave the top [ quote ] line alone. The additional infos identify who you quoted, and notifies the poster that they were responded to.
Now if you reached the end of a text-block you want to quote, end it with [/ quote ]. Type your response, and before the next quoted block, start a new quote with a simple [ quote ]
I found that this is the best way of dealing with longer posts.
I THINK we are talking two different things and I no longer want to miss understand you I want to speak on the same language. You are clearly someone that understands the science on a certain level starting to get that so now I want to understand what you are saying in reference to what I am saying. I want us on the same page lets go one thing at a time. Lets work through these problems.
The problem is quite simple, and still you don't seem to understand it: you are using an unevidenced and untestable assertion as the basis for your position.
Because after my searching I find no other possibility.
And that is the gist of this problem. You did find NO OTHER possibility... so you assert a possibility that you still cannot find, but assume as inevitable.
You simply assert a solution for your problem, without giving any evidence that it is or is not real.
Seriously can we get beyond the car thing ... I thought you were a hack ... ok if your a scientist lets just move on to the serious lol.
Seriously?
You said that "math" shows your position right. So, let's talk maths.
What is the square root of -1?
You can do sums and products and sines and cosines all day, and you won't find a real solution for this question.
Now "science" (math) came up with a solution. The square root of -1 is a number different from real, rational, natural, or even irrational numbers. We call these numbers "imaginary numbers", we do the maths, and find that we can indeed to all the usual maths with these numbers. We have found a solution.
You are still doing the sums and products and sines and cosines, don't find a solution and declare "I cannot see any other possibility... it must be zero!"
You cannot do any maths to show that this solution is true... all you keep doing is showing that 1, and 1/2 and -3.14152 isn't a solution. You are no longer doing maths.
No actually had the convo with a scientist that worked through the coals like you just did but then we got down to the what if there was no other possible explanation other then intelligence? Then how do you define the intelligent interaction etc.
That's when its gets awesome.
But you cannot show intelligence as a possible explanation. You have done nothing to show it. You simply assert that it IS a possible explanation, without evidence.
And that, dear fellow, is not science.
