I didn't go into detail because it's not necessary - as I said, if it's
possible for a simple replicator to emerge under the conditions described, that's sufficient.
QUOTE]
Actually no it is not. It is mathematically impossible to create what you want in the 200 million years or so you have before bacteria. Many people think you have the entire timespan of the earth to work with but you don't. This is why its actually far harder for the atheist to work on the pre life problem. How do you first get to somewhere where you can have selection. Well its going to be hard its just going to be impossible. Its the combination space. Lets say 200 million years x the minutes in the days of those years. Lets do the math easy style ... 200ma x 365 x 24 x 60 will get you = 105,120,000,000,000 or 105 trillion or lets round down make it easy 10 to the power of 13. But you have a problem in that the best case I have ever seen was 1 chance in 10 to 78. But that's for a protein this thing your going to need whatever it is because we have never seen it. No proof of it. Well whatever it is will have to be much more complicated.
There is a reason that scientists gave up on life springing into cells because they realized it was way to far out. Then they went to DNA and most have pretty much gave up on that. There are now 20 theories that are mostly bad the best one is RNA and the Pre-RNA the one where "something" sort of "invented" RNA hahaha. Oh wait you don't believe me. You think oh I don't read the literature.
Ok:
http://www.redorbit.com/news/science/73781/prebiotic_chemistry_and_the_origin_of_the_rna_world/#PkAgGpkYJZXUyLLp.99
Let me just save you some time .. just read the first paragraph because it is long and only intended for geeks (sometimes I can be one) that are into this stuff which will mostly bore people to death. Eh let me just give you the last sentence:
Molecular Biologists' Dream. This in turn leads to a discussion of genetic systems simpler than RNA that might have "invented" RNA. Finally, we review studies of prebiotic membrane formation.
Yeah and they should dream on because of all the problems. But they get paid to dream and write long articles and talk about the imaginary pre-pre-cell thing ... something. Oh wait they have different names for these "things".
I have read there names and it makes me laugh. Because we don't have anything and we never did. But we do have a name.
I was once in a debate when someone brought up one of the names. I told him that I knew of the Ur-Animal and it had a name ... this was interesting to them until I showed them a red dragon I found on DeviantArt. Now I have an artist drawing, a name, a theory and I can write a 5000 word essay on this "thing".
Where did the information come from?
We havn't even talked about that yet. That is the fun part.
Want to make $5,000,000?
If you can show 3 scientists where the information for life came from you will win $5,000,000 ... the prize has been going on for years. No takers.