An atheists world (2)

[CabVet]

Are you Canadian?

No.

 

[toolmanjantzi]

No.

You are likely to have an accent. Or would I have the accent?

 

[CabVet]

You are likely to have an accent. Or would I have the accent?

I grew up in Texas, still have a slight accent. I cannot hear you through this forum, so I can't really tell if you have an accent. But what does that have to do with anything? At all?

 

[lasthero]

A sentence must start with a capital.

Like this.

Unless you are using 'Morris Code'; in that case you said "dot, dot, dot" what? Or, "s what?".

Seriously, don't you think attacking grammar and spelling while texting is just a bit cynical?

What the heck is Morris Code? Do you mean 'Morse code'?

And no. There's always time for proper grammar and spelling. In this day and age, there's no excuse.

 

[toolmanjantzi]

I grew up in Texas, still have a slight accent. I cannot hear you through this forum, so I can't really tell if you have an accent. But what does that have to do with anything? At all?

Thanks. My point exactly. If accent has no bearing on intelligence, why should the grammar or spelling have any bearing on the conversation. Why side track the conversation based on a explanation mark.

 

[toolmanjantzi]

What the heck is Morris Code? Do you mean 'Morse code'?

And no. There's always time for proper grammar and spelling. In this day and age, there's no excuse.

I am writing on a iPhone. Auto-correct does what it wants. If spelling and grammar is that big of a deal to you; what about eternity?

 

[lasthero]

I am writing on a iPhone. Auto-correct does what it wants. If spelling and grammar is that big of a deal to you; what about eternity?

I'm writing on an iPhone, too. It has autocorrect. Autocorrect does not 'do what it wants', correcting mistakes is a simple matter.

And what about eternity?

 

[toolmanjantzi]

I'm writing on an iPhone, too. It has autocorrect. Autocorrect does not 'do what it wants', correcting mistakes is a simple matter.

And what about eternity?

In that case. A comma is required between 'And' and 'what'.

 

[lasthero]

No, it isn't.

 

[toolmanjantzi]

No, it isn't.

Ok.

 

[toolmanjantzi]

Children play nice now.

If we were children we would not be making issue of grammar and spelling. Unfortunately it is important for some.

First line of attack on Theology is grammar and spelling. Nice!

 

[Subduction Zone]

Have you looked in yours?

What makes you a good person. Since the objective evidence of good is corrupt by sin, may I suggest Christ as the absolute for measurement of what is good.

No, a folk tail is not a good example at all.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Wrong. It is the evidence for His existence. The answer to the question asked was "yes" it proves the existence.

For many are called, but few are chosen. (Matthew 22:14 KJV)

Enter ye in at the strait gate: for wide is the gate, and broad is the way, that leadeth to destruction, and many there be which go in thereat: Because strait is the gate, and narrow is the way, which leadeth unto life, and few there be that find it. (Matthew 7:13, 14 KJV)

Nope, that is not what you said. Go back and look at what I asked and you agreed too.

You said that the number of people who thought your god was the wrong god was evidence of his nonexistence. I was shocked when you said that.

 

[Subduction Zone]

I used the video in another thread a few months ago. What are you talking about?

Did you watch the whole video?

Did you even come close to understanding it if you watched it?

 

[Subduction Zone]

"Gravitation is one of the four fundamental interactions of nature, along with electromagnetism, and the nuclear strong force and weak force."

Let me know if 'nuclear' is a force?

Oh my.

You have no clue do you?

The answer is "No."

 

[Subduction Zone]

A sentence must start with a capital.

Like this.

Unless you are using 'Morris Code'; in that case you said "dot, dot, dot" what? Or, "s what?".

Seriously, don't you think attacking grammar and spelling while texting is just a bit cynical?

Do you mean "Morse Code"? And that sort of an error is due to Muphry's Law.

 

[lasthero]

If we were children we would not be making issue of grammar and spelling. Unfortunately it is important for some.

First line of attack on Theology is grammar and spelling. Nice!

I wasn't attacking your theology. I absolutely could not care less about your theology. I am the minimum level of caring. Zero caring. None.

 

[createdtoworship]

This thread is absurd, and makes Christianity look terrible.

how so? We would like to work on this. This is why we are here.

 

[createdtoworship]

Please tell me you're joking.

no not really, try it.

 

[createdtoworship]

Photon
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article is about the elementary particle of light. For other uses, see Photon (disambiguation).
Photon
Military laser experiment.jpg
Photons emitted in a coherent beam from a laser
Composition Elementary particle
Statistics Bosonic
Interactions Electromagnetic
Symbol γ, hν, or ħω
Theorized Albert Einstein
Mass 0
<1×10&#8722;18 eV/c2[1]
Mean lifetime Stable[1]
Electric charge 0
<1×10&#8722;35 e[1]
Spin 1
Parity &#8722;1[1]
C parity &#8722;1[1]
Condensed I(JPC)=0,1(1&#8722;&#8722[1]
A photon is an elementary particle, the quantum of light and all other forms of electromagnetic radiation, and the force carrier for the electromagnetic force, even when static via virtual photons. The effects of this force are easily observable at both the microscopic and macroscopic level, because the photon has zero rest mass; this allows long distance interactions. Like all elementary particles, photons are currently best explained by quantum mechanics and exhibit wave–particle duality, exhibiting properties of both waves and particles. For example, a single photon may be refracted by a lens or exhibit wave interference with itself, but also act as a particle giving a definite result when its position is measured.
The modern photon concept was developed gradually by Albert Einstein to explain experimental observations that did not fit the classical wave model of light. In particular, the photon model accounted for the frequency dependence of light's energy, and explained the ability of matter and radiation to be in thermal equilibrium. It also accounted for anomalous observations, including the properties of black body radiation, that other physicists, most notably Max Planck, had sought to explain using semiclassical models, in which light is still described by Maxwell's equations, but the material objects that emit and absorb light, do so in amounts of energy that are quantized (i.e., they change energy only by certain particular discrete amounts and cannot change energy in any arbitrary way). Although these semiclassical models contributed to the development of quantum mechanics, many further experiments[2][3] starting with Compton scattering of single photons by electrons, first observed in 1923, validated Einstein's hypothesis that light itself is quantized. In 1926 the chemist Gilbert N. Lewis coined the name photon for these particles, and after 1927, when Arthur H. Compton won the Nobel Prize for his scattering studies, most scientists accepted the validity that quanta of light have an independent existence, and Lewis' term photon for light quanta was accepted.
In the Standard Model of particle physics, photons are described as a necessary consequence of physical laws having a certain symmetry at every point in spacetime. The intrinsic properties of photons, such as charge, mass and spin, are determined by the properties of this gauge symmetry. The photon concept has led to momentous advances in experimental and theoretical physics, such as lasers, Bose–Einstein condensation, quantum field theory, and the probabilistic interpretation of quantum mechanics. It has been applied to photochemistry, high-resolution microscopy, and measurements of molecular distances. Recently, photons have been studied as elements of quantum computers and for sophisticated applications in optical communication such as quantum cryptography.
Contents [hide]
1 Nomenclature
2 Physical properties
2.1 Experimental checks on photon mass
3 Historical development
4 Early objections
5 Wave–particle duality and uncertainty principles
6 Bose–Einstein model of a photon gas
7 Stimulated and spontaneous emission
8 Second quantization
9 The hadronic properties of the photon
10 The photon as a gauge boson
11 Contributions to the mass of a system
12 Photons in matter
13 Technological applications
14 Recent research
15 See also
16 Notes
17 References
18 Additional references
Nomenclature[edit source | editbeta]

Standard model of particle physics
CERN LHC Tunnel1.jpg
Large Hadron Collider tunnel at CERN
Background[show]
Constituents[show]
Limitations[show]
Scientists[show]
v t e
In 1900, Max Planck was working on black-body radiation and suggested that the energy in electromagnetic waves could only be released in "packets" of energy. In his 1901 article [4] in Annalen der Physik he called these packets "energy elements". The word quanta (singular quantum) was used even before 1900 to mean particles or amounts of different quantities, including electricity. Later, in 1905 Albert Einstein went further by suggesting that electromagnetic waves could only exist in these discrete wave-packets.[5] He called such a wave-packet the light quantum (German: das Lichtquant). The name photon derives from the Greek word for light, &#966;&#8182;&#962; (transliterated phôs), and was coined[Note 1] in 1926 by the physical chemist Gilbert Lewis, who published a speculative theory in which photons were "uncreatable and indestructible".[6] Although Lewis' theory was never accepted as it was contradicted by many experiments, his new name, photon, was adopted immediately by most physicists. Isaac Asimov credits Arthur Compton with defining quanta of energy as photons in 1923.[7][8]
In physics, a photon is usually denoted by the symbol &#947; (the Greek letter gamma). This symbol for the photon probably derives from gamma rays, which were discovered in 1900 by Paul Villard,[9][10] named by Ernest Rutherford in 1903, and shown to be a form of electromagnetic radiation in 1914 by Rutherford and Edward Andrade.[11] In chemistry and optical engineering, photons are usually symbolized by h&#957;, the energy of a photon, where h is Planck's constant and the Greek letter &#957; (nu) is the photon's frequency. Much less commonly, the photon can be symbolized by hf, where its frequency is denoted by f.
Physical properties[edit source | editbeta]

See also: Special relativity


The cone shows possible values of wave 4-vector of a photon. Green and indigo represent left and right polarization
A photon is massless,[Note 2] has no electric charge,[12] and is stable. A photon has two possible polarization states. In the momentum representation, which is preferred in quantum field theory, a photon is described by its wave vector, which determines its wavelength &#955; and its direction of propagation. A photon's wave vector may not be zero and can be represented either as a spacial 3-vector or as a (relativistic) four-vector; in the latter case it belongs to the light cone (pictured). Different signs of the four-vector denote different circular polarizations, but in the 3-vector representation one should account for the polarization state separately; it actually is a spin quantum number. In both cases the space of possible wave vectors is three-dimensional.
The photon is the gauge boson for electromagnetism,[13] and therefore all other quantum numbers of the photon (such as lepton number, baryon number, and flavour quantum numbers) are zero.[14]
Photons are emitted in many natural processes. For example, when a charge is accelerated it emits synchrotron radiation. During a molecular, atomic or nuclear transition to a lower energy level, photons of various energy will be emitted, from radio waves to gamma rays. A photon can also be emitted when a particle and its corresponding antiparticle are annihilated (for example, electron–positron annihilation).
In empty space, the photon moves at c (the speed of light) and its energy and momentum are related by E = pc, where p is the magnitude of the momentum vector p. This derives from the following relativistic relation, with m = 0:[15]
E^{2}=p^{2} c^{2} + m^{2} c^{4}.
The energy and momentum of a photon depend only on its frequency (&#957 or inversely, its wavelength (&#955:
E=\hbar\omega=h\nu=\frac{hc}{\lambda}
\boldsymbol{p}=\hbar\boldsymbol{k},
where k is the wave vector (where the wave number k = |k| = 2&#960;/&#955, &#969; = 2&#960;&#957; is the angular frequency, and &#295; = h/2&#960; is the reduced Planck constant.[16]
Since p points in the direction of the photon's propagation, the magnitude of the momentum is
p=\hbar k=\frac{h\nu}{c}=\frac{h}{\lambda}.
The photon also carries spin angular momentum that does not depend on its frequency.[17] The magnitude of its spin is \scriptstyle{\sqrt{2} \hbar} and the component measured along its direction of motion, its helicity, must be ±&#295;. These two possible helicities, called right-handed and left-handed, correspond to the two possible circular polarization states of the photon.[18]
To illustrate the significance of these formulae, the annihilation of a particle with its antiparticle in free space must result in the creation of at least two photons for the following reason. In the center of mass frame, the colliding antiparticles have no net momentum, whereas a single photon always has momentum (since it is determined, as we have seen, only by the photon's frequency or wavelength—which cannot be zero). Hence, conservation of momentum (or equivalently, translational invariance) requires that at least two photons are created, with zero net momentum. (However, it is possible if the system interacts with another particle or field for annihilation to produce one photon, as when a positron annihilates with a bound atomic electron, it is possible for only one photon to be emitted, as the nuclear Coulomb field breaks translational symmetry.) The energy of the two photons, or, equivalently, their frequency, may be determined from conservat

I knew you were going to c & p some dictionary, but do YOU know what it is?

try it. In your own words. If you dare.