An atheists world (2)

[toolmanjantzi]

How do we know that you have been saved? This debate is about objective evidence. It does not matter what you or I believe for objective evidence. It is the same either way. So you have already admitted failure.

Again we are talking about objective evidence. You are still failing.

What "evolutionary propaganda"? Life evolved, that is rather obvious. All of the observable evidence supports the theory of evolution. To date no one has shown any evidence for creation.

I am still waiting.

Was not a "Force" required to start both evolution? Is that "Force" not brought on by "Energy"? God is both the force and the energy required for Genesis.

Do I need to prove God now, or that He was both the Force and Energy required to Create the Universe?

 

[lasthero]

Was not a "Force" required to start both evolution?

No. What ever gave you that idea?

Was a force needed to 'start' gravity?

 

[Subduction Zone]

Was not a "Force" required to start both evolution? Is that "Force" not brought on by "Energy"?

No.

God is both the force and the energy required for Genesis.

Again, no. No claims allowed without evidence.

Do I need to prove God now, or that He was both the Force and Energy required to Create the Universe?

Yes.

 

[Strathos]

What are we talking about now?

 

[Subduction Zone]

So toolman, are you going to continue to post nonsense or can you make one coherent claim?

 

[Subduction Zone]

What are we talking about now?

Trying to educate toolman about force.

Sadly he has no clue.

 

[Strathos]

Force as in mass * acceleration?

 

[Subduction Zone]

Force as in mass * acceleration?

He hasn't got that far yet.

 

[CabVet]

Was not a "Force" required to start both evolution? Is that "Force" not brought on by "Energy"?

No, and even if it was, evolution does not deal with it.

God is both the force and the energy required for Genesis.

Genesis certainly doesn't say that, well not literally, and if you open the door for that you can make it mean anything.

Do I need to prove God now, or that He was both the Force and Energy required to Create the Universe?

No proof needed, just evidence would be nice.

 

[kellhus]

Force as in mass * acceleration?

Yes. That and energy. As in joules, kg*m^2/s^2

He thinks they are God.

 

[toolmanjantzi]

I'm sorry I don't do a good job of interpreting a post that appears characteristically schizophrenic in how random and disconnected it is. Most people don't.

Hence the definition of intelligence.

 

[toolmanjantzi]

Quit talking to your mirror.

Have you looked in yours?

What makes you a good person. Since the objective evidence of good is corrupt by sin, may I suggest Christ as the absolute for measurement of what is good.

 

[lasthero]

...what?

 

[toolmanjantzi]

That's interesting. The first Christian ever to admit that his God is subject to a popular vote.

So, according to toolmanjantzi since most people don't believe in his God he does not exist.

In some ways I actually agree with him.

Wrong. It is the evidence for His existence. The answer to the question asked was "yes" it proves the existence.

For many are called, but few are chosen. (Matthew 22:14 KJV)

Enter ye in at the strait gate: for wide is the gate, and broad is the way, that leadeth to destruction, and many there be which go in thereat: Because strait is the gate, and narrow is the way, which leadeth unto life, and few there be that find it. (Matthew 7:13, 14 KJV)

 

[toolmanjantzi]

You did not take time to watch the video.

You can't comment on that until then.

I used the video in another thread a few months ago. What are you talking about?

 

[toolmanjantzi]

No. What ever gave you that idea?

Was a force needed to 'start' gravity?

"Gravitation is one of the four fundamental interactions of nature, along with electromagnetism, and the nuclear strong force and weak force."

Let me know if 'nuclear' is a force?

 

[lasthero]

...what?

 

[toolmanjantzi]

...what?

A sentence must start with a capital.

Like this.

Unless you are using 'Morris Code'; in that case you said "dot, dot, dot" what? Or, "s what?".

Seriously, don't you think attacking grammar and spelling while texting is just a bit cynical?

 

[CabVet]

Seriously, don't you think attacking grammar and spelling while texting is just a bit cynical?

Not when you make the same simple mistake, over, and over, and over, and over again. It becomes distracting.

 

[toolmanjantzi]

Not when you make the same simple mistake, over, and over, and over, and over again. It becomes distracting.

Are you Canadian?