Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Perhaps some women can do that, but I suspect that most would think something slightly different than they would if they were seeing a nice car or a pretty flower. Women are not assexual, nor are they entirely unaffected by what they see. Men and women both need to be careful not to let their eyes to cause them to lust.HMSSydney said:thanks for everyone's advice - it's good to know I am not the only one struggling with this issue.
I am still confised- and still drawn to the things of the flesh. I have heard women can look at a guys' chest, rear, front or whatever just like they look at a car, flower or a book. I just cant' do that; if i see someone really nice walking the streets, forgive the language, but i always wonder what is under the mini skirt or under her top.
Now hyphotetically speaking, i am single and she is single.... is that a sin? how could it possibly be? no-one is attacthed and both are single under Gods' eyes. now if the person is married i believe that is a sin but both being single, i just have a hard time trying to undestand that.
Believe me, i do want to change and i just hope you can read between the lines.
Here's a few thoughts for you:HMSSydney said:Now hyphotetically speaking, i am single and she is single.... is that a sin? how could it possibly be? no-one is attacthed and both are single under Gods' eyes. now if the person is married i believe that is a sin but both being single, i just have a hard time trying to undestand that.
Believe me, i do want to change and i just hope you can read between the lines.
I'm just like you. I too wonder whats under their clothing. But that is if I look too long. Indeed it is wrong. There is nothing wrong with a quick acknowledgement of beauty but when you start undressing a person with your eyes or start to lust after them that is when you have gone too far.HMSSydney said:thanks for everyone's advice - it's good to know I am not the only one struggling with this issue.
I am still confised- and still drawn to the things of the flesh. I have heard women can look at a guys' chest, rear, front or whatever just like they look at a car, flower or a book. I just cant' do that; if i see someone really nice walking the streets, forgive the language, but i always wonder what is under the mini skirt or under her top.
Now hyphotetically speaking, i am single and she is single.... is that a sin? how could it possibly be? no-one is attacthed and both are single under Gods' eyes. now if the person is married i believe that is a sin but both being single, i just have a hard time trying to undestand that.
Believe me, i do want to change and i just hope you can read between the lines.
InTheFlame said:Here's a few thoughts for you:
- If it's OK for you to look at a woman this way, it's OK for a guy to look at YOU this way. I say a guy, because this will probably come closer (for you) to approximating how a woman would feel at the idea of you mentally undressing her.
- Are you thinking of her with respect? If you think, 'God loves this precious child', does that stuff up your daydream? Are you thinking of her as a person, or as a thing to have sex with?
- When you're married, will this behaviour magically stop?
Chajara said:other times it's simply an appreciative look and "Yeah, I'd hit it."
HMSSydney said:Hi all, I think I am turning into a serious pervert, I just cant help looking at nice bodies as they walk the street or nice and sometimes stunning females at university or church. Am I the only one who struggles with this? I heard somewhere the first time you look is innocent but the second look is evil
I must confess that I enjoy looking at females, especially those who dress to be looked at, if everyone was to wear modest clothes it probably wouldnt be a problem but we all know what goes on in our universities, churches and streets; tight jeans, tight tops and/or miniscule clothes dont help.
Today as i was driving back home, i saw this stunning brunette wearing one of those nice but totally evil skirts (if you know what i mean by evil) well, traffic was moving slow and I thought Id look, then it turned into staring and she caught me staring at her and gave me a funny look, (maybe I should have given her my number- lol) but seriously tho I felt really bad bacause I saw her as an object and not as a person.
It is so hard to stay physically pure and even harder to be psychologically pure. Is this the lesser of two evils? Any thoughts from gals or guys?
ascribe2thelord said:No, I don't think you're a pervert, but she is probably a lesbian or a stipper, one of the two. Both of them hate being looked at by guys. Or maybe she's just an ordinary girl who's been around a lot of perverted guys ... people who wanted only to have sex with her. So, it's not you, it's her.
InTheFlame said:Probably a...! *deep breath* Dude, women who base their self-respect on things other than their looks often don't like being stared at. Not a quick glance of appreciation, you'll note, but staring. I don't like some guy staring at me as though I'm an object made to satisfy his lust... and no, I'm not a lesbian, nor a stripper. I think God will forgive me for pointing out that I'm using immense self-control here, since you're not here and can't see the steam wisping from my ears.
xxclixxx said:EVERY MANS BATTLE
Very few guys DONT have a problem with this, and yes it is a problem. No you aren't perverted, but learning to "bounce the eyes" is a must. Letting in the second glances can EASILY lead you down a perverted road. It can start out as a "oh she looks nice" second glance, and become a constant thought process, wherever you go getting a "high" from checking out girls.
Also - be carefull about advice that says "it's normal just don't lust" coming from girls.. They generally don't have the sexual reactions guys have from looking, and so they can easily look at a guy and say he's cute without having any lust, but guys are wired totally different (so girls I'd suggest reading the book too so you understand what your brothers and future husband are going through, it'll probably change the way you dress =P)
InTheFlame said:Probably a...! *deep breath* Dude, women who base their self-respect on things other than their looks often don't like being stared at. Not a quick glance of appreciation, you'll note, but staring. I don't like some guy staring at me as though I'm an object made to satisfy his lust... and no, I'm not a lesbian, nor a stripper. I think God will forgive me for pointing out that I'm using immense self-control here, since you're not here and can't see the steam wisping from my ears.
Hmmm... I don't think this is what was said - rather that men tend to have problems with visual input - the process often goes 'look, look again, drool'. I think there's some truth in this for many men. Most women don't tend to have that exact problem... they have others they struggle with, though.ascribe2thelord said:I totally disagree. You're saying that all men have a perverted disposition (geared toward lust) and that all women have a non-perverted disposition (completely pure).
I think you've got a point there. Acknowledging all people around us as God's creations, and people that he loves, often seems to kill the lust problem.ascribe2thelord said:I doubt this is so true. The people who write these kinds of books ought to keep in mind the fact that there is more to holiness and sanctification than reaching a target age/sex group.
ditto.ascribe2thelord said:Personally I do believe a guy can admire a girl without lusting at her.
Women too.ascribe2thelord said:It's only natural to admire what God created for us, guys...
Mmmmm... I'm not sure about this one. I can see that a 'good' mindset could slip into a 'bad' one fairly easily, without vigilance.ascribe2thelord said:(moving on) but it is unnatural to obsess about any certain woman unless we're in love with that person. There is no "thin line" or "second look" between admiring and lusting - either you are in the mindset to lust, or in the mindset to simply praise God for His wonderful works.
Mmmm... I drive hubby nuts when he's walking with me. 'look at that girl's skirt! Hey, pretty car! Oh look, a blue butterfly! Ooh, pretty flower! Sexy guy! Gorgeous girl! Hey, look at that bird!'ascribe2thelord said:Of course, He also created plants, trees, and animals. Those are interesting too, you know!
Hmmm... what you don't address here, which I think is pertinent, is that Every Man's Battle seems to be a reaction against the socialisation which teaches men to look at a woman and think 'sex'. I'm not sure that it's the best way to deal with the problem, but re-teaching oneself is a big process...ascribe2thelord said:So anyway, what was I saying? Oh, "Every Man's Battle" lodges guilt inside the mind of the believing man simply for being himself, teaching him that he cannot look twice without lusting. (Hasn't anyone heard of shyness?)
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?