FreeGrace2
Senior Veteran
- Nov 15, 2012
- 20,401
- 1,730
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Constitution
And the Bible tells us that eternal life is a gift of God in Rom 6:23. And that God's gifts are irrevocable in Rom 11:29.I just did. 1 Timothy 6:16 tells us that Jesus alone has immortality. Immortality is eternal life.
And Jesus said those who believe HAVE eternal life in John 5:24. And He also said that those He gives eternal life WILL NEVER PERISH in John 10:28.
How in the world can anyone believe the teaching of loss of salvation with such clear verses?
It seems you've either flatly rejected the teaching of Rom 11:29 or you just don't understand it.You have to realize that gifts in the real world need to be taken care of or otherwise you can lose those gifts.
What's to stop one?For example: If you receive a car as a gift, that does not mean you can run red lights, and drive drunk.
This is just an attempt to distort Scripture. There are NO conditions listed in the verse that teaches that God's gifts are irrevocable. Therefore, ALL of them are irrevococable.As for Romans 11:29: As I said to you before, this is spoken to unsaved Israel. It is saying how God's gifts and CALLING of God (that come with conditions) are unchangeable.
Because of what 11:29 means, the ONLY WAY there would be exceptions would be IF Paul listed them THEN, to clarify that NOT ALL God's gifts are irrevocable.You are merely reading into that verse that there are no conditions to the receiving of God's gift and His calling.
But since Paul did NOT provide any exceptions, there are NONE.
I've seen a number of things that your view cannot reconcile with Scripture.How do you relate God's morality or goodness with Eternal Security?
I just cannot reconcile the two.
We are saved (receive eternal life) by GRACE through faith, not of works.
It is clear that your views cannot be reconciled with Scripture.
This indicates a serious vision problem.I see the vast majority of Eternal Security as justifying evil (of which God cannot agree with).
Upvote
0