Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
No one is allowed to answer 'I don't know' because 'I don't know' is just not good enough, that's why creationists must say 'a magic man did it', it answers nothing but it makes them feel good all over.We do not know what happened at the singularity which formed the universe, no. Not yet. Also we do not know what were the first chemical steps to the origin of life.
No one is allowed to answer 'I don't know' because 'I don't know' is just not good enough, that's why creationists must say 'a magic man did it', it answers nothing but it makes them feel good all over.
...an intelligent creator who came from nothing
making everything from nothing,
If you do not know, then who cares how many problems it is you do not know?Your position is logical even though you have turned one problem into two, I don't think it's supposed to work like that?
Surly the idea is to solve the problem not add another problem to the one we already have.
What makes more sense, an intelligent creator was the cause for the creation or that everything created itself from nothing?
Yours is not the reasonable, logical position. In fact, evolution requires much more faith than creationism.
Come on now, can you even define evolution!?evolution dos not need faith when it has enough evidence for it. its easy to say god did it but how did god do it. why.
Come on now, can you even define evolution!?
Come on now, can you even define evolution!?
Great, so do it.I can,
Depends on the context.can you define kind? I bet that you cannot.
If you already know A is different than B, obviously you must have some reason. Let me try that then. ... Animal A is a lion. Animal B is a wolf. The criteria I use is that God gave me a brain and eyes.Most creationist can only give a list of kinds. They have no working definition of kind. One that would tell us what criteria to use to judge whether animal A and animal B are different kind or not.
So you can define evolution? I don't care where you learned it! What are you waiting for..Christmas?at least i learned it from somewhere other than a creationist book
So you can define evolution? I don't care where you learned it! What are you waiting for..Christmas?
Great, so do it.
Depends on the context.
If you already know A is different than B, obviously you must have some reason. Let me try that then. ... Animal A is a lion. Animal B is a wolf. The criteria I use is that God gave me a brain and eyes.
Excellent!!! Now the question arises, how long was the process of evolving slow, and how can you prove it?Evolution is the slow process that changes animals and plants (i kept it simple for you)
No. I already won. A kind is now any kind of animal. A created kind was the original created kind.That is an outright failure. If you want to play that way you lost already.
Excellent!!! Now the question arises, how long was the process of evolving slow, and how can you prove it?
The evolving just after the flood and before it would have had to have been very very fast.
No. I already won. A kind is now any kind of animal. A created kind was the original created kind.
Speak for yourselves.i forgot to mention Species multiply. we split from the chimps 6-9 million years ago.
the pattern of resemblance you see when you compare genes using Modern DNA techniques compare the genes of any animals and then plot out how they are similar and they fit perfect it is a family tree.
How can I define 'it', when you do not say what it is? A created kind? That was a kind long long ago. The created trait of evolving obviously would muddy the waters by the present time.Except you cannot define it.
You lost.
Name the animals.One more time, you have an animal A and an animal B. How do you tell if they are the same kind or not.
I can tell you how to tell if two animals are the same species or not.
Why can't you define kind?
So define kinds then, if you do not mean created kind? You mean current kind of animal? We are not mind readers here.Here is a hint, assuming that kinds were "created kinds" is begging the question. Do so again and you lost.
How can I define 'it', when you do not say what it is? A created kind? That was a kind long long ago. The created trait of evolving obviously would muddy the waters by the present time.
Name the animals.
Can you really though? Then do it using an example.
Created kind?
So define kinds then, if you do not mean created kind? You mean current kind of animal? We are not mind readers here.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?