Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Your whole point of view rest on Adam and Eve being dim wits, sorry.. of having child like innocents...where mine is based on them being intelligent people!Infinity's Dice said:So what's with this bit in the New Testament, where the devil tempts Christ? I thought the whole point of that was Christ DIDN'T give in.
And Christ knew it was wrong in the first place. Unlike, apparently, Adam and Eve.
Let's try a dictionary.
temp·ta·tion: noun
1 : the act of tempting or the state of being tempted especially to evil : ENTICEMENT
2 : something tempting : a cause or occasion of enticement
No, Merriam-Webster doesn't agree with you either.
Sorry, that's a reprehensible form of morality.
If a person does something unknowing that what they do is wrong, that what they do is hurting other people, the should not be held accountable for having done wrong.
Secondly, there's the nature of what they did. They ate a fruit. From this fruit, they gained knowledge. Does this mean that God would prefer us to be ignorant?
The latter verse is supposed to support the former claim, I assume? How so? If a person has a childlike simplicity, and no need to labor (or I assume have dominion over the animals of the earth) why would that person be suspicious of any creature created by their God? And why would he or she assume that they were superior to the creatures of the world?
You haven't shown otherwise, hon.
Having child-like innocence and being intelligent are not mutually exclusive. Some of the smartest people in the world are naive as heck.Your whole point of view rest on Adam and Eve being dim wits, sorry.. of having child like innocents...where mine is based on them being intelligent people!![]()
Without consequences being known and realized as right or wrong, the ideas that are right and wrong mean nothing.Rainbow. said:Ok... to ME temptation is ,when you have been told/asked not to do something,you go ahead and do it anyway because you want to find out for yourself!
The consequence's of their actions isn't the point..whether they knew it was good or evil
is secondary to what they did.
Surely they would realise that they were above a serpent!
"And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth."
So please dont think that Adam And Eve where some kind of innocents who knew no better.![]()
love&forgiveness said:yes, it would be better for us if we were ignorant to sin, if we had never known it.
What is death, to those that know not the loss that death brings? What is death, to those who have not felt the danger of losing their lives?love&forgiveness said:God warned them they would die and that is what happened ,they were given paradise or ecstacy ,whatever you may call it ,it was perfect in every way ,they only had to obey one thing and they could live this life forever ,but no they believed the creature over the Creator ,and what happened ,their life as they knew it was no more ,they disobeyed the almighty and called Him a liar ,if they was not punished this way God would have been a liar, which He is not.
God bless.
paul
I think there must have been a heaven for a place for God to dwell in.Arthur Dietrich said:A couple of things.
Was there a heaven before 'the fall'? If so, why? Was there even a soul? Why? If there was no death, why the need for a soul or a 'better place' for it to go to?
How the heck did the snake get in there?
Also, I don't think they could've reproduced before 'the fall'. Mainly because there are no accounts of their children eating the fruit.
Also...what would've happened if Adam had not eaten the fruit?
On the subject of temptation. I think this was brought up: Why would God put the tree there if he didn't want them to eat from it?
I've never understood God's need to "test" people. Tests are, in the human world at least, admistered to figure out something about people. An omniscient god should not need to test people -- it implies that he doesn't really know everything.Rainbow. said:I think there must have been a heaven for a place for God to dwell in.
As for how the snake got in there, maybe God put him there to test Adam & Eve.
Again, why would an omniscient being need to give anyone "the benefit of the doubt?" Darest thou cast doubts on God's all-knowingness?Rainbow. said:As for God putting the tree there, Maybe that was because in his heart he wanted to give them the benefit of the doubt.
Firstly, why does God need to have emotions? I can see how emotions would be useful to a finite, limited being, but for the life of me, I cannot see why God would ever need more than, at most, one emotion.Rainbow. said:It would have been much more satisfying for God to have placed the tree there, and they not eat the fruit, rather than having no tree at all.
Maybe. Assuming that Genesis should be interpreted as being literally true, and assuming that your literally true interpretation is correct...Rainbow. said:Maybe if Adam & Eve, had never touched the fruit, maybe we would be living in a totally peaceful world devoid of all sin?!![]()
A-yup.Rainbow. said:The only thing that is for sure, is that we will never know for sure, all of the answers to our questions in this lifetime!
You are quite good at avoiding the question.love&forgiveness said:death is the end of a life as you know it ,if someone or something dies it is no longer alive in this world as we know it.there is no doubt the body dies right?i believe we will go to a better place after our death ,that's what the word of God has told me ,the word of God told adam and eve they would die, God has a way of making you understand what you need to know, He forbid it ,don't forget the respect God deserves He's much more than a king or a father He is a more powerful being than we could ever imagine He is the Creator the Almighty He is God.i would suppose they feared Him to an extent, He gave them fair warning and it was obvious it was against His will.
off to bed now.
God bless.
paul
Now the serpent was more crafty than any of the wild animals the LORD God had made. He said to the woman, "Did God really say, 'You must not eat from any tree in the garden'?"
2 The woman said to the serpent, "We may eat fruit from the trees in the garden, 3 but God did say, 'You must not eat fruit from the tree that is in the middle of the garden, and you must not touch it, or you will die.' "
4 "You will not surely die," the serpent said to the woman. 5 "For God knows that when you eat of it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good and evil."
6 When the woman saw that the fruit of the tree was good for food and pleasing to the eye, and also desirable for gaining wisdom, she took some and ate it. She also gave some to her husband, who was with her, and he ate it.
7 Then the eyes of both of them were opened, and they realized they were naked; so they sewed fig leaves together and made coverings for themselves.
8 Then the man and his wife heard the sound of the LORD God as he was walking in the garden in the cool of the day, and they hid from the LORD God among the trees of the garden. 9 But the LORD God called to the man, "Where are you?"
10 He answered, "I heard you in the garden, and I was afraid because I was naked; so I hid."
11 And he said, "Who told you that you were naked? Have you eaten from the tree that I commanded you not to eat from?"
12 The man said, "The woman you put here with me-she gave me some fruit from the tree, and I ate it."
13 Then the LORD God said to the woman, "What is this you have done?"
The woman said, "The serpent deceived me, and I ate."