What exactly is this statement supposed to convey in terms of principles and meaning? Do you believe that because a number of fertilized embryos "naturally" do not make it to birth that they are somehow less than human, or somehow less morally valuable than born children? What exactly is the point in making this statement? What belief does this point you towards?1/2-2/3 of all fertilized human embryos, when left alone, never result in a live birth.
What exactly is the point in making this statement? What belief does this point you towards?
Is there a reason you avoided the question? It doesn't encourage healthy dialogue. What is the point of providing those statistics? What should I take away from that? Does it somehow mean that abortion is not morally wrong? I don't get the point of providing the statistic.Spontaneous Abortion is by far the single largest Killer of unborn Babies.
Not a belief, just a fact.
I note that not one proponent of abortion has suffered the procedure themselves.
Contraceptives are indeed a responsible choice to include in your decision to fornicate. At least it lowers the chance of a woman getting pregnant. Still the best decision is to wait until you are married.
Ever hear of not playing God and 'we all have a fighting chance?"So you would prefer we live poor, without healthcare, short lives, insufficient food, living eight people a room and wondering where we are going to scrounge next days living while the women destroy their health with repeatedly giving births like in Pakistani borderlands ?
You call that God`s economy ? What is so great about suffering ?
God gave women the option of choosing when to have sex so that we would not have this problem. Last I checked, women have brains too.Ever wonder why God did not give women an option of choosing when to be fertile and when not to so we would not have this problem ?
Is there a reason you avoided the question? It doesn't encourage healthy dialogue. What is the point of providing those statistics? What should I take away from that? Does it somehow mean that abortion is not morally wrong? I don't get the point of providing the statistic.
You don't distinguish a distinction between the natural failure for an egg to implant and the intentional killing of an implanted, healthy, growing human being?If we are to make the claim that we are genuinely concerned about the number of fertilized embryos that are aborted, willful disregard of the fact that spontaneous abortions far outnumber surgical or chemical abortions weakens the claim of "concern", and only highlights the hypocrisy of those making the claim.
This would be analogous to you getting upset at The American Kidney Foundation for being hypocritical because they are not doing research into preventing heart disease because heart disease kills more people than Kidney failure.If we are to make the claim that we are genuinely concerned about the number of fertilized embryos that are aborted, willful disregard of the fact that spontaneous abortions far outnumber surgical or chemical abortions weakens the claim of "concern", and only highlights the hypocrisy of those making the claim.
She has the choice of saying no. If someone then rapes her it is not because God did not make it impossible for women to get pregnant. Blaming God for the evil of men is unjust.
By the way, if I require a kidney to survive, and you are a donor match, You should be forced to give me one of yours.
I was waiting to deal with this fallacious line of reasoning until we worked through the previous fallacious line of reasoning, but I may as well address it now as I have a few minute before heading home.PS, If I require one of your Kidneys, You should be required by law to give it to me, no?
This would be analogous to you getting upset at The American Kidney Foundation for being hypocritical because they are not doing research into preventing heart disease because heart disease kills more people than Kidney failure.
The reality though is that both are important and both are valuable, but supporting one does not mean that they don't care about the other.
You don't distinguish a distinction between the natural failure for an egg to implant and the intentional killing of an implanted, healthy, growing human being?
You do realize failure of an egg to implant is NOT an aborted Pregnancy, correct?
An egg has to implant FIRST, for it to be a pregnancy.
Are you capable of contributing anything other than useless sarcasm that doesn’t promote constructive conversation?I think we need a national pregnancy registry, or Department of Pregnancy, where every woman of child bearing age needs to present her menstrual tissue EVERY MONTH for examination for possible miscarriage, so every miscarriage can be documented, the fetal remains either buried or cremated, and the cause of the miscarriage can be determined and legal action taken if it is shown to have been influenced in any way by the behavior or actions of the mother.
Women can not be trusted to decide this for themselves.
I did not make myself clear. I meant that the individual (obviously) was not aborted.Totally false. Show me how it is possible for many women to never regret having their own abortions, yet at the same time be pro-lifers.
The keyword is lowers. Because contraception does not always prevent a woman from getting pregnant it is important to note that even if you are married, you should never have sex until you want to have kids.
God gave women the option of choosing when to have sex so that we would not have this problem
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?