- Mar 18, 2014
- 38,117
- 34,056
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I assume you've been to see SW #7?? We went to see it Sat afternoon, the wife isn't really a Sci-Fi fan but she really liked the movie... I've seen the other 6 and found myself speculating out loud what was going to happen next, she finally elbowed me and told me to shut up I was spoiling the movie...
What was the participation rate for the study?
The lies are in your post. You cannot prove that 95% of women procuring abortions report satisfaction with their decision.
I doubt that even 10% of women who procure abortions even report.
But we do know of many cases where an abortion went bad, and women had to be rushed to the hospital, that women have died from having abortions, and that years later, women have regretted having an abortion.
It may be true that most abortions are performed in the early stages of a pregnancy,
but that does not give detrement to the fact that many abortions do involve fully formed fetuses.
Where would PP get their organs to sell???
Any procedure performed by competent doctors will be safer than same performed by incompetent doctors or by non-doctors. The fact is that there aren't enough competent doctors willing to kill fetuses, so abortion clinics have to use non-doctors with some perfunctory supervision.
Regarding your statistics, we all know how statistics lie-just look at unemployment rates and climate change statistics.
How is it selfish to ask that created children be allowed to live. How is it unselfish to kill a child you participated in the creation of. (Remember that most rapes do not produce fertilization!). How is it unselfish to use abortion as a form of contraception, which the vast majority of abortions are?
No comments on the sample drop out rate? Significant in both studies.
That is an excellent question considering there are right about 1 million per year...
Again, had you read the study in detail, you would realise that there are valid, reliable statistical instruments which were used to compensate for the 'drop outs' as you call them.
I'm beginning to doubt that you have bothered to read the study. The author goes into some detail on this point.
She wasn't there are two distinct examples in that post, 1 unprotected consensual sex, and the other rape, rape being the one about killing the other victimIn what way was the woman who was the victim of a rapist "irresponsible?"
The drop out rate is telling regardless of the touted original sampling.
Why? Because later drop outs may provide evidence for later regret.
So far it just seems like you're redefining terms. You define baby as being by definition outside the womb, I don't because there's very little developmental difference whether inside or outside after a certain point in pregnancy so it seems irrational to treat he/she as a precious little human life one minute and something less than human just prior to that moment based only on their location.Sorry about that. Just trying to emphasize.
With "IT'S IMPOSSIBLE TO ABORT BABIES. There is never a baby in a womb!" I was just trying to point out that you should not be so self-contradictory. In case you don't know it, the big lie (repeated at every opportunity) is that the fetus is a baby. That is about the only argument you have, to constantly repeat that basic falsehood in every way possible.
IT IS NOT TRUE, oops, sorry, It is not true that any of my arguments don't hold up. I challenge you to point to one of my arguments and tell me what's untrue about it.
And, of course, you've read the process by which participants were recruited, haven't you?
You haven't read it have you? You are completely ignorant of the methodology employed, yet feel qualified to criticise.
Honesty? Integrity?
Please.
Depends on the screening criteria for the candidates of the study.
I was part of an organization for a number of years which employed surveys to determine effectiveness of the program of instruction. When I was given supervision I reviewed the Inspector General reports on the previous supervisor's watch.
He apparently handed out surveys to willing customers and a finding that certain customers were targeted for their enthusiasm with the program.
The screening criteria is very important and so is the motivation of the study group.
So far it just seems like you're redefining terms. You define baby as being by definition outside the womb, I don't because there's very little developmental difference whether inside or outside after a certain point in pregnancy so it seems irrational to treat he/she as a precious little human life one minute and something less than human just prior to that moment based only on their location.
How can something that is not alive move, grow, perform somersaults, and suck their thumbs? You need to take biology 101!
Thankyou for your opinion. Duly noted and filed in the round filing basket.
You haven't read it have you? You are completely ignorant of the methodology employed, yet feel qualified to criticise.
Honesty? Integrity?
Please.
The R word again.
So were "YOU" the one who did the study/ies or the interviews of all the women??? (With 50+ million abortions on the books that's a lot of women to talk to)...
So do you think all the interviewees were up front and honest with you???
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?