Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Yes, but the question ( or issue) really was that they are not being very effective which I believe to be true in which case it should be less restrictive because this is one of those cases really that enforcement could lead to death than allwing it as an option.The laws in question are secular.
If an adult can't live without his insulin then its not murder if I prevent him from ever using it again.
There is helping and there is enabling there is a differenceAnd sometimes helping people even though you don't think they deserve it is the right thing to do.
Let’s make a concession (which you’ll never agree to). How about outlawing all abortions except for rape and incest, and if the mother’s life is at risk.Even in rape.......
That and at least legally it would be hard to prove that the suspect prevented them from using it.That's a different circumstance since there are issues of bodily autonomy at stake.
A mother's life is at risk if she chooses to have an unsafe abortion, as well.Let’s make a concession (which you’ll never agree to). How about outlawing all abortions except for rape and incest, and if the mother’s life is at risk.
So your solution is to kill them early so they won’t be put in a rare situation later that might be harmful. Got it.
I’m in favor of holding the doctors accountable.Nope. I could only see justifying restricting abortion when the fetus is viable and there aren't risks to the mother's mental and physical health, and to seek ways to create a more just society where all people are cared for. That is a genuinely pro-life ethic.
A few weeks ago I watched a documentary called Tashi and the Monk, about the Ven. Lobsong Phuntek, a Tibetan monk who runs an orphanage in northern India. He himself was abandoned in trash by his mother when he was born, and taken into a monastery. Of course he himself found a great deal of healing in caring for others, being the father for others he never had. But that is something he has chosen to do, nobody compelled him.
In reality, the problems of unwanted pregnancies is not something that can be handled only by law, but it must also involve provisions to actually help people, not punish them. All American evangelicals do is have a punitive mentality towards women, I don't see them doing the hard work of actual raising orphans.
I’m in favor of holding the doctors accountable.
And maybe if we’d stop killing babies, there would be babies to adopt.
It’s a baby. It’s murder.I'm in favor of the government staying out of it unless there is some compelling reason to interfere in what objectively is a medical procedure.
By all means, seek to persuade women to put up kids for adoption . But you have no right to try to force women to do so. It's their body, their choice.
Then we have to get these lazy people off Medicaid, WIC, SNAP, SSI, TNAF, Section 8,etc. Put them in those tents and camps we’re wasting on illegals. So a few million die. They should’ve thought of that before being born.How about we make performing abortions illegal? Then it’s not the woman who is the criminal.
Then, if there’s government assistance needed (if the woman decides to raise her child), we can treat food stamps like WIC, and have a list of foods that are acceptable. And with mandatory drug testing.
That’s a good start. Much better than killing a person in the womb, don’t you think?
It isn't about concessions. It is about dealing with abortion in a logical and productive manner. It is about righting the wrongs which put women in a position which requires them to consider abortion.Let’s make a concession (which you’ll never agree to). How about outlawing all abortions except for rape and incest, and if the mother’s life is at risk.
Liberal! Father have rights, too!Let’s make a concession (which you’ll never agree to). How about outlawing all abortions except for rape and incest, and if the mother’s life is at risk.
Huh?Then we have to get these lazy people off Medicaid, WIC, SNAP, SSI, TNAF, Section 8,etc. Put them in those tents and camps we’re wasting on illegals. So a few million die. They should’ve thought of that before being born.
There aren’t enough people to care for the children already in foster care.I’m in favor of holding the doctors accountable.
And maybe if we’d stop killing babies, there would be babies to adopt.
Huh?Liberal! Father have rights, too!
Where are those kids, then?There aren’t enough people to care for the children already in foster care.
We’ll want to address the post-birth person as well. We don’t want them dragging us down with welfare. We made sure they got born. Job continues.Huh?
Some are housed in hotels temporarily until they can be placed in Georgia. Or group homes.Where are those kids, then?
Mkay.We’ll want to address the post-birth person as well. We don’t want them dragging us down with welfare. We made sure they got born. Job continues.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?