Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I am satisfied with you thinking I lost so we can move on. soon you'll be calling me a liar like trump (who isn't a liar either).Wrong on more than one level. The video that you promised to watch dealt with your same video that attacks Dawkins. And you made no conditions besides my answering your question.
But you apparently know that you only posted a joke video here. I am satisfied with your loss.
Get back to me when you watched the whole thing.. where 6 atheists admit defeat and some become christianI wouldn't trust Ray Comfort if I were you. He deliberately edits his "movies" in such a way so that he looks like the smart guy and paint a bad picture on his interviewees.
Based on the questions he asks you can bet he didn't even manage to finish middle school and is in no position to talk about biology or evolution.
Praying for you bud. seem to be really bitter.You made it a topic when you promised to watch it and did not.
And I did watch your dishonest video about Dawkins. I don't know what you are complaining about.
No one is going to watch the video that you linked because they know that Comfort is a liar. I offered to watch it once you watched the video that you said that you would. I will even make it obvious that I watched your video.
So once more, watch the video that I linked for you. Ask me questions whenever you get confused, and you will be confused since you do not have a very deep science education, I will gladly help you understand those parts.
Prove itYou do know that these videos are selectively edited right? That there are probably hundreds of of interviews by Ray where the above didn't happen. It's just he's never going to put that footage in his videos, because he's trying to create a specific narrative.
That's why these types of videos are a bit of a joke really. You simply gather enough raw footage and then cut small snippets together to frame whatever viewpoint you're trying to create.
Now, now, calling you a liar would be against the rules. I would not want to break the rules. I already showed that you are relying on a liar. Hmm, I think I will post that video again, since you did not seem to understand it.I am satisfied with you thinking I lost so we can move on. soon you'll be calling me a liar like trump (who isn't a liar either).
Prove it
Prove it
gambling on it, and praying about it are two separate things. But you should try some of the video, it may do you good. Just saying.Want to put some money on it?
You guys are shooting your self in the foot by attacking ray comfort, you make the atheists look unintelligent, cause they agreed with his common sense. maybe you guys lack that common sense.
prove it, with real proof, not just your opinion. And I used to work at a newspaper so I have some knowledge how journalism works.There's nothing really to "prove". It's just a basic understanding of how journalism works. Have you ever been interviewed before? I have on multiple occasions (both TV and newsprint). It's amazing to me how just much footage or dialog they collect and how the majority of it isn't used. You can sit down for a 15 to 20 minute interview only to have all of 5 seconds of video or a single quote show up in the final product. In some cases it can even involve multiple takes of the same question. (Imagine answering the same question over again just to get a better 'version' of it).
You can find out this for yourself if you follow any Youtubers who do interview style videos or other videos involving the public. I follow some Youtubers that have talked about the process. Street magic videos are a good example of this. Street magicians will film hours of tricks with various pedestrians and then cherry-pick the very best results. Any times the trick failed or they didn't get a good reaction from the participants, they don't use that footage. They just take the best responses. The result is that a dozen or more hours of raw footage can get distilled down a single 20 minute or so video.
It's no different with what Ray Comfort is doing. He probably collected dozens of hours of video footage over multiple days solely to put together a single 1 hour video. Naturally all the times people actually rebut his questions or laugh at him or whatever, he's not going to show. He's given you a carefully constructed and highly biased end result. After all, you're not seeing everything that went into making this, only the finished product.
Maybe you expected to post that video here and think we'd have the same sorts of reactions as his interview subjects. But what you're seeing here isn't edited or filtered. Those of us non-believers who are familiar with Ray Comfort tend to think he is a joke. Hence, we're not falling over in amazement, we're just laughing at him.
If you really think a Ray Comfort-style video is a true representation of a discussion (and attempted conversion) a non-believer then you really have a lot to learn.
gambling on it, and praying about it are two separate things. But you should try some of the video, it may do you good. Just saying.
You guys are shooting your self in the foot by attacking ray comfort, you make the atheists look unintelligent, cause they agreed with his common sense. maybe you guys lack that common sense.
prove it, with real proof, not just your opinion. And I used to work at a newspaper so I have some knowledge how journalism works.
You should post specific information from the video that you find compelling. Rather than asking everyone to watch an hour long youtube video.
prove it, with real proof, not just your opinion.
And I used to work at a newspaper so I have some knowledge how journalism works.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?