• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

A Realization

Status
Not open for further replies.

Thomas2618

Well-Known Member
Oct 4, 2005
418
9
38
Augusta, Ga
✟30,603.00
Faith
Anglican
Lel said:
Just because I might have morally really screwed things up doesn't mean God has done the same.

God may be right and humans have screwed up God's moral codes.

Am I the only one that has a HUGE problem with this idea...I mean if that is true then I can't really trust anything I hear in church, and then I don't know what to believe because I can't trust one thing about Christianity, and then I get really scared because I would begin to feel uncertain about EVERYTHING, and that is really a stressful state of mind. That line of thinking just seems really uneasy and scary.
Now, traditional Christianity is something that I can trust, as it has been around for 2000 years. We as imperfect humans have rested in the bride of Christ, the Church. My faith is a belief in something tangible, just as I have faith in the chair I'm sitting in.
 
  • Like
Reactions: scraparcs
Upvote 0

scraparcs

aka Mayor McCheese
Mar 4, 2002
53,004
4,844
Massachusetts
✟106,578.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
Thomas2618 said:
Am I the only one that has a HUGE problem with this idea...I mean if that is true then I can't really trust anything I hear in church, and then I don't know what to believe because I can't trust one thing about Christianity, and then I get really scared because I would begin to feel uncertain about EVERYTHING, and that is really a stressful state of mind. That line of thinking just seems really uneasy and scary.
Now, traditional Christianity is something that I can trust, as it has been around for 2000 years. We as imperfect humans have rested in the bride of Christ, the Church. My faith is a belief in something tangible, just as I have faith in the chair I'm sitting in.

Maybe I should clarify.

I mean that although God is perfect and the Church as a whole is perfect, we humans are not so perfect. We need not judge Christ by the individual Christians sometimes.
 
Upvote 0

HandmaidenOfGod

Christ is Risen! Indeed He is Risen!
Sep 11, 2004
5,972
470
✟38,269.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Private
If truth is eternal and unchanging, and Christ is the eternal way, truth, and the life, how can you say that God or Christianity is "changing"?

God does not change.

"Jesus Christ is the same yesterday, today, and forever." Hebrews 13:8

In XC,

Maureen
 
Upvote 0

karen freeinchristman

More of You and less of me, Lord!
Site Supporter
Aug 18, 2004
14,806
481
North west of England
✟107,407.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
HandmaidenOfGod said:
If truth is eternal and unchanging, and Christ is the eternal way, truth, and the life, how can you say that God or Christianity is "changing"?

God does not change.

"Jesus Christ is the same yesterday, today, and forever." Hebrews 13:8

Truth IS eternal and unchanging - agreed.

Since God exists eternally, outside of time, and God is truth and love, then truth and love do not change, ever.

But when we say, "God does not change", we can be mislead into thinking that the way we see God cannot change.

Due to our limited ability to grasp eternal things or even things outside our own constructs, our omnipresent God (with his plan for his creation only truly known by himself), in working out his plan, does cause people to change. Situations have to change in order for God's Kingdom to come fully. Things cannot possibly stay the way they are. People, in response to God's love, and in the desire to do his will, help God to bring justice to the earth; to the oppressed, the unloved, and to the undefended.

God doesn't change. Truth doesn't change. Love doesn't change. We can't comprehend these things fully. Things do change, and people do change. God's priorities do not change; but how we understand his priorities can change.

That is why Christianity, as a response to the grace of God, can and should 'evolve' over time, in my view.
 
Upvote 0

karen freeinchristman

More of You and less of me, Lord!
Site Supporter
Aug 18, 2004
14,806
481
North west of England
✟107,407.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
gtsecc said:
This Revelation of yours may be correct, but it is inconsistant with how God has been understood by the Church for the last 2,000 years.

I knew I could count on you for a response, gtsecc! :)
 
Upvote 0

Thomas2618

Well-Known Member
Oct 4, 2005
418
9
38
Augusta, Ga
✟30,603.00
Faith
Anglican
HandmaidenOfGod said:
If truth is eternal and unchanging, and Christ is the eternal way, truth, and the life, how can you say that God or Christianity is "changing"?

God does not change.

"Jesus Christ is the same yesterday, today, and forever." Hebrews 13:8

In XC,

Maureen

God doesn't change. Truth doesn't change. Love doesn't change. We can't comprehend these things fully. Things do change, and people do change. God's priorities do not change; but how we understand his priorities can change.

That is why Christianity, as a response to the grace of God, can and should 'evolve' over time, in my view.

Great posts! In lieu of Christ's promise that the Church would be led into all Truth, we cannot or should not "change" our understanding so something completely different from what she has taught for 2000 years. As humans, we are far from perfect and have limited capacity to understand God, and therefore our understanding of the Faith once delivered to the Saints can grow, but cannot "change" in such a way that central issues in Christianity are changed or thrown out.
 
Upvote 0

karen freeinchristman

More of You and less of me, Lord!
Site Supporter
Aug 18, 2004
14,806
481
North west of England
✟107,407.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
Thomas2618 said:
Great posts! In lieu of Christ's promise that the Church would be led into all Truth, we cannot or should not "change" our understanding so something completely different from what she has taught for 2000 years. As humans, we are far from perfect and have limited capacity to understand God, and therefore our understanding of the Faith once delivered to the Saints can grow, but cannot "change" in such a way that central issues in Christianity are changed or thrown out.
Yes, I agree. Our understanding can grow (which to me implies change), but the gospel doesn't change; never has and never will. The good news brought to us by Jesus Christ, showing us the way of reconciliation with God, doesn't change. The Church's understanding of it all grows and 'changes' over time.
:)
 
Upvote 0

Simon_Templar

Not all who wander are lost
Jun 29, 2004
7,865
1,131
51
Visit site
✟51,677.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
Fish,

I said goodbye to the forums a while back, and still intend to maintain my absence for the most part. However I do stop by from time to time just to see whats going on. I could not restrain myself from responding to this thread.

First I must preface all that I say with the statement that I do not presume to judge the state of your spirit or soul, or your eternal fate, and I do not do so for fear that I should underestimate the grace and mercy of God through our Lord Jesus Christ.

However, the view that you have expressed thus far is in no way "christian". It is, in fact, the very opposite of christian. The root of what you have expressed is exactly the same as the original sin that seperated our race from God and brought death upon us.
The basic temptation offered to Adam and Eve by the serpent was that they could become their own gods, knowing good and evil for themselves, apart from God. It is often thought, vainly, by humanists and gnostics that God sought to with hold knowledge from Adam and Eve by forbidding the tree. This is not so. God was giving knowledge to them, the only issue was what would be the source and measure of their knowledge.
In the conversation of Eve and the Serpent it is evident that she knew it was wrong and evil to eat of the tree.. she did not sin from niavity or ignorance, but willfully in a desire to have knowledge apart from God, and to be equal with God.
Furthermore, the result of this sin is unavoidable when you consider the teaching of the whole of scripture. God is holy utterly and completely holy.. this means he is entirely pure. The concept of holiness is something the bible also refers to as "singleness" or "oneness" in modern terms we might call it homogeneous. It is impossible for there to be anything within God which is contrary to God, or even other than God.

thus, when adam and eve chose to have knowledge apart from God, in an act of disobedience, which was an act of seperating their will from God's.. the unavodiably seperated themselves from God. Cut themselves off from communion with him, from his life, from his goodness, love, mercy etc. This can be seen as punnishment, but more so it is simply the result, the necessary consequence of their action.

We being in the likeness and image of God still have a semblance of what He is, we have a semblance of life, a semblance of goodness, of love, of mercy and so on but it is marred and ruined. That is the state of our mortality, and that is what Christ came to fix.

Now, when you say that you do not believe God to be just, or his actions to be just you are holding God to a standard. Gtsecc attempted to make a very valid true point that apart from an almighty God, there is no standard. Thus the action of holding God to a standard, aside from being unwise, is also illogical. If you attempt to hold God to a standard there are only two options to choose from.. either you make yourself the standard (which is merely a repetition of the sin of Adam and Eve in the garden) or you believe that there is a standard apart from God which is higher than God.

In the first case, you make youself the standard (which is the recourse of secular humanism and ethical atheists) it is really just an exercise in illogical reasoning. For if there is a God, and we are his creations, for us to dictate to God is the lower attempting to criticize the higher. Whatever true knowledge of justice we have as creations must come from God.. how then can we hope to justly criticize him? If on the other hand there is no God, then there is also no over arching morality, no such thing as right and wrong.. only expedient or not expedient, doable, or not doable, able, or not able.

In order for there to be anything other than "might makes right" there must be an over arching all knowing, all just, all authoritative God who decrees from himself what justice is, what right is... because with out that there is only each person's prefrence and their ability to force their prefrence on others. So the only way to avoid "might makes right" is for there to be a God like the God of the bible.. and if there is such a God, you not only have not right to hold him to account, it is impossible and absurd for you to think that you could do so justly as he himself is the source and standard of all justice.

If you opt for the second case and believe that there is a standard apart from God, and above God, that standard must have arisen from some source, it must be backed by some authority through which it governs both you and God.. where-ever it derives from, and derives its authority from would be in essense the real God.. thus all you are doing is arguing that one god is false and there must be a different higher God.
However, in your discussion thus far you have given no source other than yourself for your convictions of morality and justice thus it would seem that the reality is that you are exalting yourself to godhood by exalting your standard of morality and justive above or at least equal to God Most High. That brings us back around full circle to the garden of Eden and our original sin.

The heart of all sin, of all human evil is the exaltation of our own will above God, of our own standards above God. It is that act which seperates us from God and it is primarily that attitude and act which the grace of Christ directs us to purge from our soul.
The process of santification, salvation of the soul, is entirely bound up with the submission of our will to God's will.. submitting our will, our thoughts, our beliefs, everything that we are to Him. This is the path that Christ offers us, he will accomplish this work in us, but we must be willing to submit.. willing to give up will. It is only on this path to which Christ is the gate, that we may find communion with God.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Naomi4Christ
Upvote 0

Inside Edge

Senior Member
Aug 3, 2004
789
80
Vancouver, BC
✟31,365.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
God doesn't change. Truth doesn't change. Love doesn't change. We can't comprehend these things fully. Things do change, and people do change. God's priorities do not change; but how we understand his priorities can change.That is why Christianity, as a response to the grace of God, can and should 'evolve' over time, in my view

An extremely important point. I would even take it a step futher. If God is outside of time, at the beginning and the end, then everything He is doing (from His perspective) is already done. That means if He changes His M.O. somewhere along the human timeline, as far as "ultimate circimstances" are concerned, nothing has changed at all. A "change" in communication or in the way he wants humans to communicate or relate (or whatever) was planned, enacted, and completed without delay or diversion - right from the beginning and is so in the end.

We're slapping one, big, giant limitation on God by suggesting that things must be done down here the same, for always.
 
  • Like
Reactions: higgs2
Upvote 0

Look Homeward Anglican

Senior Veteran
May 14, 2005
2,021
202
57
United States
✟25,751.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Private
Simon_Templar said:
The root of what you have expressed is exactly the same as the original sin that seperated our race from God and brought death upon us.

Since I cannot decide which part of your post to quote for what I am about to say, I'll just leave the above because I think that is the gist of it.
I struggle with this a lot; this idea that our margin (in the Anglican/Episcopal church) of free thinking and our giving of less attention to ecclesial laws and consequences of veering from them is tantamount to man's first sin in the garden. Sometimes it absolutely shakes me. I like to think of myself as a kind person and a good enough person who honestly loves others and wants fairness for all people and forbearance of our many differences. Sometimes this gives me the impression that, by such virtue, I am capable of knowing what is right from what is not right. And I have rushed to the defense of sinners of all kinds, hoping to stand in the way of that first stone that someone might throw, in the name of love and forgiveness and the examination of my own conscience above judgment of others...

Then again, even Christ Himself, after ministering to those who had sinned under the law -- after acting above the law on their behalf -- did refer them back under the rule of the law. Such as when he cured a certain leper, then said for him to go back to his priest and be cleansed (as the law demanded), or the time he saved the adulteress from stoning and told her to go and sin no more, not "go, and if it happens again don't worry -- just do the best you can and be happy no one will stone you as long as I'm around."

I have a great inner conflict with these ideas and I'm not sure what the resolution is. I do know that Robinson's position as a Bishop in our church causes me to grit my teeth fairly often -- it has less to do with him being a self-identified homosexual and more to do with the fact he openly engages in that lifestyle, having abandoned his family to whom he was responsible in the bond of holy matrimony, to indulge in mere physical pleasures...it does not look good that our church winks at such things or allows it. It gives the impression that our holy orders are really only governmental positions: a priest is like a store manager, a bishop, like a regional vice president, an archbishop a franchise owner and ceo....rather than being offices of holy ministry that they ought to be. It worries me greatly when I think about it at times.

Beyond that, the idea of being able to rationally think and decide all moral issues for myself is frightening most of the time, and coupled with the absence of a real moral compass within the church (which has among its ordained men people such as Spong who openly deny the existence of God and yet who are bishops) when it is considered bad to say that anything at all might be "wrong" to do or be....there is a terrifying gap open in the earth for people to fall right into, isn't there? I do understand that the old laws had become an idol unto themselves, but even Christ did not throw away the laws. He obeyed them all the way to the cross.

It is mind-boggling to me, and frustrating to have no clear idea of the safest route in these murky waters.
 
Upvote 0

karen freeinchristman

More of You and less of me, Lord!
Site Supporter
Aug 18, 2004
14,806
481
North west of England
✟107,407.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
Inside Edge said:
An extremely important point. I would even take it a step futher. If God is outside of time, at the beginning and the end, then everything He is doing (from His perspective) is already done. That means if He changes His M.O. somewhere along the human timeline, as far as "ultimate circimstances" are concerned, nothing has changed at all. A "change" in communication or in the way he wants humans to communicate or relate (or whatever) was planned, enacted, and completed without delay or diversion - right from the beginning and is so in the end.

We're slapping one, big, giant limitation on God by suggesting that things must be done down here the same, for always.

well said!
 
Upvote 0

Thomas2618

Well-Known Member
Oct 4, 2005
418
9
38
Augusta, Ga
✟30,603.00
Faith
Anglican
karen freeinchristman said:
Yes, I agree. Our understanding can grow (which to me implies change), but the gospel doesn't change; never has and never will. The good news brought to us by Jesus Christ, showing us the way of reconciliation with God, doesn't change. The Church's understanding of it all grows and 'changes' over time.
:)

I'm rather hungry now, so I hope you don't mind if I use a food analogy. The Faith should not change over time nor should our understanding of it 'change' (though as I said our understanding of the Faith can grow...I would think that change implies replacement instead of growth.) For instance, if you have a cake and you add frosting, you still have the same cake. That's not a problem. The problem comes when you start cutting away pieces of the cake to make it have different decorative shape for that leaves out the Whole of the Cake; or if you throw out the cake and make it into cheesecake, saying "well, it's still cake; I mean we call it cheesecake don't we?"...the point is that in both of the latter situations, something or all of the correct cake is missing due to change, where as in the first situation, that cake gained understanding and grew with the frosting.
 
Upvote 0

higgs2

not a nutter
Sep 10, 2004
8,627
517
64
✟41,247.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Private
Inside Edge said:
An extremely important point. I would even take it a step futher. If God is outside of time, at the beginning and the end, then everything He is doing (from His perspective) is already done. That means if He changes His M.O. somewhere along the human timeline, as far as "ultimate circimstances" are concerned, nothing has changed at all. A "change" in communication or in the way he wants humans to communicate or relate (or whatever) was planned, enacted, and completed without delay or diversion - right from the beginning and is so in the end.

We're slapping one, big, giant limitation on God by suggesting that things must be done down here the same, for always.
:thumbsup: This is a very interesting and well stated idea. Very nicely said.
 
Upvote 0

john23237

Senior Member
Jan 30, 2005
732
147
77
virginia
✟284,546.00
Faith
Anglican
Politics
US-Democrat
SeenAndUnseen said:
I have a great inner conflict with these ideas and I'm not sure what the resolution is. I do know that Robinson's position as a Bishop in our church causes me to grit my teeth fairly often -- it has less to do with him being a self-identified homosexual and more to do with the fact he openly engages in that lifestyle, having abandoned his family to whom he was responsible in the bond of holy matrimony, to indulge in mere physical pleasures...

Here we go again. Where was this "great inner conflict" when we just had divorced and re married heterosexual bishops? Where the bruxism when remarks like "abandoned his family" ( dishonest, his ex wife and children are very supportive of him as he is of them and have made it clear that they were not abandoned) are made? Is false witness no longer a sin? Do you honestly regard EVERY divorced person as having "abandoned" their family or just gays? As to the "to indulge in mere physical pleasures" bit, has it ever occurred to you that he honestly loves his partner or do you consider gay Christians as animals unable to truly love, only lust? Never mind, I think I know the answer to that one. In regard to "that lifestyle" do you understand that any number of scholars who have spent their lives studing Holy Scripture have a very different understanding of this subject than one gathers you do?As to holy matrimony, do you understand how hypercritical it is to refuse to grant blessings of the union or marriages to gay couples and then condemn them for the lack there of? This whole, pathetic argument is suggestive of why persons might question a faith system which uses mistranslations and mis understandings of correct ones as weapons against their fellow Christians who happen to be gay.

To the Mod. Please feel free to edit or remove this post as per the rules. I think my spleen has been vented.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wiffey
Upvote 0

karen freeinchristman

More of You and less of me, Lord!
Site Supporter
Aug 18, 2004
14,806
481
North west of England
✟107,407.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
Thomas2618 said:
I'm rather hungry now, so I hope you don't mind if I use a food analogy.
I don't mind at all; I'm always hungry! :yum:

Thomas2618 said:
The Faith should not change over time nor should our understanding of it 'change' (though as I said our understanding of the Faith can grow...I would think that change implies replacement instead of growth.)
Well, to me change does not necessarily mean 'replacement'; also, to me, growth of any sort is change. :)

Thomas2618 said:
For instance, if you have a cake and you add frosting, you still have the same cake. That's not a problem. The problem comes when you start cutting away pieces of the cake to make it have different decorative shape for that leaves out the Whole of the Cake; or if you throw out the cake and make it into cheesecake, saying "well, it's still cake; I mean we call it cheesecake don't we?"...the point is that in both of the latter situations, something or all of the correct cake is missing due to change, where as in the first situation, that cake gained understanding and grew with the frosting.

Very nice descriptive argument, but it doesn't work for me, I'm afraid.

After all of that cake, I'm feeling rather full now, so if you don't mind, I will
use an analogy from the fascinating world of Entomology.

Consider the caterpillar...
growth... + time... = change! a beautiful butterfly! :angel:
 
Upvote 0

Thomas2618

Well-Known Member
Oct 4, 2005
418
9
38
Augusta, Ga
✟30,603.00
Faith
Anglican
karen freeinchristman said:
I don't mind at all; I'm always hungry! :yum:


Well, to me change does not necessarily mean 'replacement'; also, to me, growth of any sort is change. :)



Very nice descriptive argument, but it doesn't work for me, I'm afraid.

After all of that cake, I'm feeling rather full now, so if you don't mind, I will
use an analogy from the fascinating world of Entomology.

Consider the caterpillar...
growth... + time... = change! a beautiful butterfly! :angel:

Very nice analogy. However, if I may continue that analogy, I would argue that we'd have a very confused butterfly if everyone was able to choose what they thought or how they feel led that the the new butterfly should look like when it comes out.
 
Upvote 0

Look Homeward Anglican

Senior Veteran
May 14, 2005
2,021
202
57
United States
✟25,751.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Private
john23237 said:
Here we go again.

You can go wherever you like, but I'm not packed for your trip so you'll have to go without me.
You seem to have focused entirely on my mention of Bishop Robinson and my "take" on the situation with him. Thank you for taking the time to reply to my post, but it would have been nice had you addressed what it had to do with.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.