A question for flat earth people

[Tom 1]

So everything that does not fit your heliocentric religion will be poetic I see

The -centric suffix is getting a lot of exposure in this thread.

 

[A_Thinker]

But it also says earth does not orbit the sun so why do you believe it ?

Where does it say that the Earth doesn't orbit the sun ?

Your approach to interpreting the Bible is as if it is a Science textbook.

When we both should known that that's not the purpose of the writings which make up the scriptures.

The purpose of Scripture is to communicate God's love to humanity.

 

[A_Thinker]

So everything that does not fit your heliocentric religion will be poetic I see

Well ... there's no question but that the passage which you cited was poetic.

The chief communication of the Bible is much more poetic ... than it is scientific ...

 

[Chinchilla]

Well ... there's no question but that the passage which you cited was poetic.

The chief communication of the Bible is much more poetic ... than it is scientific ...

would you consider this passage poetic also ? Hebrews 10:5

 

[Chinchilla]

Where does it say that the Earth doesn't orbit the sun ?

Yes , because the sun had to be stopped not the earth .

 

[A_Thinker]

would you consider this passage poetic also ? Hebrews 10:5

Not particularly ...

 

[A_Thinker]

Yes , because the sun had to be stopped not the earth .

Depends upon the perspective of the writer, I think ....

 

[Oldmantook]

We are far apart but as the scripture states "iron sharpens iron." I previously thought flat-earthers were morons until I investigated for myself - both from a scientific as well as from a scriptural perspective. I suggest you do the same and come to your own conclusion. If you want to continue this discussion and ask questions or make comments that is fine too. If not, that is fine.

I don’t think flat earthers are morons. It’s just a way of thinking I can’t get my head around, and I’ve got other things I’m more interested in discussing that are relevant to my own interests. Appreciate your openness to discuss tho.[/QUOTE]
Fair enough; your choice. Yes the implications of the earth being flat are hard to fathom and has enormous implications, #1 being why are we being lied to but that's another subject. Hint: Satan is a deceiver and is the father of all lies. Thanks for the discussion.

 

[JacksBratt]

Wrong ....

Gravity keeps you from floating up into a tree. Has nothing to do with a spinning globe.

Gravity, or what we call gravity, was here, always has been... you are right...

However, there was no need to investigate what the cause of this force was....until people were told that we live on a ball...

Think about it... people in the US and Australia are upside down to each other... how is that possible without some force to hold our feet to the ground... Or, hold the oceans to bend around the curve and stay in their banks and shores....

You didn't need any mysterious force of attraction, to the center of the mass... before it was a ball. Down... was just down. Everyone was standing the same way.. water just sat in it's place....

Enter the globe..... enter a necessity for a force to hold it all together.

 

[JacksBratt]

The language of "heavier" implies gravity.

I think you mean "mass".

And... things were heavier or lighter... before the theory of gravity.. and it only depends on gravity if you need to explain a globe model and why people don't fall off the bottom.... or which is the bottom...

So... gravity made the outside of the globe the top and the top is all around and we are all drawn to the center... Problem solved...

 

[JacksBratt]

Oh I'm sure there has been no attempt to deceive here.

Sorry, I don't understand this post.

 

[JacksBratt]

God performed a miracle ...

So, the sun stood still..= earth stopped rotating and
the Moon stood still..= the moon stopped orbiting, and spinning..

Two separate heavenly bodies that stopped.

Why not say... "and God Caused the earth to cease in it's rotation"?

Maybe because it would contradict the scripture that says that the earth is solid on it's foundations and cannot be moved?

 

[JacksBratt]

You agree the math works out when you say "egg heads could draw some elaborate equations on a chalk board that only them and four others would understand".

Not really... I'm saying that they could make any number of cryptic symbols in any number of abstract equations and say "Look... it is proven"... and who would know.

Well, that explains your point of view completely. Thanks for sharing.

You're welcome....I think... but I do suspect a note of sarcasm and or condescension.

 

[JacksBratt]

To understand the creation narrative you first have to take your 21st C hat off and try and understand it from the thinking of the times during which it was written.

I disagree. I think you have to take your atheistic, evolutionary Darwinian hat off.

The way I see it... God can do it....... God said He did it..... God said the wisdom of men... is foolishness.

Take it from there.

 

[JacksBratt]

Since the globe and the plane are rotating at equal speeds relative to each other, the absolute speed of revolution of the planet, (and all things on it including the plane) is irrelevant to the speed of the plane whether it's traveling from A to B or from B to A. If the plane is traveling at 500 MPH, it's traveling at 500 MPH relative to the surface of the planet no matter which direction it's traveling.

Nicely put.... which... negates the Coriolis effect.

See, a bullet, is under the Coriolis effect as soon as it leaves the barrel of the gun... but airplanes... they don't. ..

Total double standard.

If "the globe and the plane are rotating at equal speeds relative to each other"

Then this must pertain to a bullet too.

 

[JacksBratt]

There’s a bit more to it.

Always is.....

 

[A_Thinker]

Gravity, or what we call gravity, was here, always has been... you are right...

However, there was no need to investigate what the cause of this force was....until people were told that we live on a ball...

Think about it... people in the US and Australia are upside down to each other... how is that possible without some force to hold our feet to the ground... Or, hold the oceans to bend around the curve and stay in their banks and shores....

You didn't need any mysterious force of attraction, to the center of the mass... before it was a ball. Down... was just down. Everyone was standing the same way.. water just sat in it's place....

Enter the globe..... enter a necessity for a force to hold it all together.

The story is told ... of Sir Isaac Newton napping under an apple tree ... when an apple fell and hit him on the head. Happenings like these led to the initial study on the phenomenon of gravity ... long before we contemplated a spinning disk.

From https://science.howstuffworks.com/environmental/earth/geophysics/question232.htm

Every time you jump, you experience gravity. It pulls you back down to the ground. Without gravity, you'd float off into the atmosphere -- along with all of the other matter on Earth.

You see gravity at work any time you drop a book, step on a scale or toss a ball up into the air. It's such a constant presence in our lives, we seldom marvel at the mystery of it -- but even with several well-received theories out there attempting to explain why a book falls to the ground (and at the same rate as a pebble or a couch, at that), they're still just theories. The mystery of gravity's pull is pretty much intact.

So what do we know about gravity? We know that it causes any two objects in the universe to be drawn to one another. We know that gravity assisted in forming the universe, that it keeps the moon in orbit around the Earth, and that it can be harnessed for more mundane applications like gravity-powered motors or gravity-powered lamps.

As for the science behind the action, we know that Isaac Newton defined gravity as a force -- one that attracts all objects to all other objects. We know that Albert Einstein said gravity is a result of the curvature of space-time. These two theories are the most common and widely held (if somewhat incomplete) explanations of gravity.

In this article, we'll look at Newton's theory of gravity, Einstein's theory of gravity and we'll touch on a more recent view of the phenomenon as well.

Although many people had already noted that gravity exists, Newton was the first to develop a cohesive explanation for gravity, so we'll start there.

In the 1600s, an English physicist and mathematician named Isaac Newton was sitting under an apple tree -- or so the legend tells us. Apparently, an apple fell on his head, and he started wondering why the apple was attracted to the ground in the first place.

Newton publicized his Theory of Universal Gravitation in the 1680s. It basically set forth the idea that gravity was a predictable force that acts on all matter in the universe, and is a function of both mass and distance. The theory states that each particle of matter attracts every other particle (for instance, the particles of "Earth" and the particles of "you") with a force that is directly proportional to the product of their masses and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them.

So the farther apart the particles are, and/or the less massive the particles, the less the gravitational force.

 

[Tom 1]

I disagree. I think you have to take your atheistic, evolutionary Darwinian hat off.

The way I see it... God can do it....... God said He did it..... God said the wisdom of men... is foolishness.

Take it from there.

God said he did what? Your wisdom of men quote, where is that from? What leads you to think it applies to the things you disagree with?

 

[Chinchilla]

Depends upon the perspective of the writer, I think ....

Do you believe the Bible is word of God or writter ?

 

[Chinchilla]

God said he did what? Your wisdom of men quote, where is that from? What leads you to think it applies to the things you disagree with?

1 Corinthians 3:19 King James Version (KJV)
19 For the wisdom of this world is foolishness with God. For it is written, He taketh the wise in their own craftiness.