Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
The cause is the evidence.Please present evidence that God was the cause.
If the creator was created He would not be ‘the’ creator, He would be ‘a’ creator.A creator cannot create itself out of nothing. Who created the creator?
Evolutionist believe in Boobzilla; a reptile grew boobs and long hair and became hot blooded.
Nobody understands evolution because it doesn't make any sense.
I'd say that it's Tinman that he's missing. We've seen his strawman. We've also seen his paper tiger, a fair substitute for the cowardly lion. And he himself is clearly the lost and alone partner (Dorothy).You are one strawman away from a role in the Wizard of Oz.
Most certainly.Would it be a universe without galaxies (stars, planets, moons, rocks, dust, ect.)?
So, you'd say a petri dish is still coming into being because there's bacteria growing inside of it?Galaxies are still coming into being and added to the universe, so the universe is still being formed.
Now as for ToE allowing for chimeras to evolve eg: crocoducks; then it is like me claiming that Christianity claims Jesus was hung by a rope and not crucified.
To our creationist friends who insist that the universe could not have come from "Nothing" : University of Michigan News Service | Theoretical breakthrough: Generating matter and antimatter from the vacuum
If I have my physics right; In the vacuum of space, matter and antimatter particles spontaneously appear and annihilate each other. Black holes manage to "suck" in some antimatter particles while leaving out matter particles on the event horizon as heat ( infra-red radiation ). Eventually after literally trillions of years the antimatter particles will cause the black holes to evaporate through the process of the antimatter particles annihilating the matter within the black hole.Isn't it correct that a vacuum does contain matter?
The cause is the evidence.
God is the cause. The cause is God. Therefore the cause is the evidence of God.
Joe is the plumber. The plumber is Joe. Therefore the plumber is the evidence of Joe.
Find the plumber and you will find Joe.
That is really bad reasoning. I could find a plumber that happens not to be Joe. I could find a Joe who isn't a plumber. The evidence for Joe being a plumber or a plumber being called Joe comes from elsewhere, not from some intrinsic connection between the concepts 'Joe' and 'plumber'.
Yet, the evidence for BB is orders of magnitude higher than that for the existence of a deity.
Why aren't humans and chimps varieties of the same kind?
Even the DNA of two individuals within the same species are not the same.
I am not stuck on it. I just use it to show how absurd it is the believe a mutation ,or several can be a mechanism for evolution.[/qutoe]
How is it absurd? Every human is born with mutations, and it is mutations that cause humans and chimps to be different.
It is not the mutation that make us a different species, it is the DNA we have.
Neither. They share a common ancestor that is part of the Carnivora kind that was neither a dog or a cat. However, both dogs and cats remain in the Carnivora kind. It is no different than chihuahuas and great danes sharing a common ancestor that was niether a chihuahua or a great dane. Oh, and by the way, the DNA of two chihuahuas will be different.
Why would matter need to come from nothing in order for our universe to have a natural origin?
Also, where did you show that life can not come about by itself? This is just an empty assertion on your part.
Maybe so. Why don' tyou eplain how life started.
All of the matter in our universe came from the condensation of energy, not nothing.
Where did he energy come from?
To our creationist friends who insist that the universe could not have come from "Nothing" : University of Michigan News Service | Theoretical breakthrough: Generating matter and antimatter from the vacuum
The problem is you can not get a perfecdt vacuum.
By the way; "something and Nothing" are not meaningful concepts in QM
Irrelevant until you can prove something can come intoeistenc from nothing
Now as for ToE allowing for chimeras to evolve eg: crocoducks; then it is like me claiming that Christianity claims Jesus was hung by a rope and not crucified.
Do you ever provide the source so we cn check it for accuracyd?
HASN'T ANY CREATIONIST EVER HEARD OF DIRAC's EQUATION
Why is it relevant. You cna' prove it is a mechanim for evolution.
We have fossils with a mixture of basal ape and modern human features. That makes them transitional
We have 200,000 ERV's shared by humans and chimps.
Given the size of vertebrate genomes (>1 × 109 bp) and the random nature of retroviral integration (22, 23), multiple integrations (and subsequent fixation) of ERV loci at precisely the same location are highly unlikely (24). Therefore, an ERV locus shared by two or more species is descended from a single integration event and is proof that the species share a common ancestor into whose germ line the original integration took place (14).
Constructing primate phylogenies from ancient retrovirus sequences
We have the evidence. You can run away from it all you want, but it doesn't change the fact that the evidence is on our side.
Keep in mind that most Creationists don't do analogies well, so if you make a remark like that without "translating" it for the metaphor-impaired, instead of recognizing that you have a point, they are going to assume that you are just going to assume you are just being randomly rude and blasphemous. You might get reported and banned because they are reading into your remark things that aren't there.
I've had posts edited and deleted over less. Once I even got a warning for a post that the only thing objected to was quoting a passage from the Bible. I have made a point of not quoting that pasage on CF since. (Though there are times I have alluded to that passage, and explained why I dared not quote it.)
That's right. Scientist has done everything under the sun to fruit flies and they continue to resist evolution. I guess this means fruit flies are creationist.
Experimental evolution reveals resistance to change : Nature
You do not.
You can have a gazillion, but humans will contiue producing humans and chimps will coninue producing chimps.
You have no bioligical evidence.
Maybe not. Why don't you explain how it got here.
Maybe so. Why don' tyou eplain how life started.
Where did he energy come from?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?