• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

tall73

Sophia7's husband
Site Supporter
Sep 23, 2005
32,792
6,175
Visit site
✟1,122,245.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
The Word of God, Sacred Scripture and Sacred Tradition, tells us Mary was a perpetual virgin. The Word of God does not tell us whether Joseph had any children or for that matter whether he was young or old or previously married. I want to make clear it is not part of Sacred Tradition. Since the Word of God does not tell us whether Joseph was previously married or whether Mary died, opinions of learned Catholics on those subject differ.

I was asking regarding the Eastern Orthodox view, partly based on the article I posted earlier discussing an aspect of their liturgy that draws on the proto gospel of James.

Regarding Catholic doctrine, my understanding is that Catholics hold to the perpetual virginity doctrine, but as you say, are able to hold to various views regarding the particulars.

Can you please link to an official source that discusses what does, and does not qualify as Sacred Tradition, from a Catholic perspective, and how that is determined? Is there a section of the Catechism that spells that out?
 
Upvote 0

Valletta

Well-Known Member
Oct 10, 2020
13,610
6,590
Minnesota
✟364,180.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
I was asking regarding the Eastern Orthodox view, partly based on the article I posted earlier discussing an aspect of their liturgy that draws on the proto gospel of James.

Regarding Catholic doctrine, my understanding is that Catholics hold to the perpetual virginity doctrine, but as you say, are able to hold to various views regarding the particulars.

Can you please link to an official source that discusses what does, and does not qualify as Sacred Tradition, from a Catholic perspective, and how that is determined? Is there a section of the Catechism that spells that out?
 
  • Like
Reactions: tall73
Upvote 0

The Liturgist

Traditional Liturgical Christian
Site Supporter
Nov 26, 2019
16,788
9,002
51
The Wild West
✟878,413.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Generic Orthodox Christian
Marital Status
Celibate
It's Authoritative for all those Eastern Catholics in communion with His Church.

Can you show me where in the Code of Canon Law for the Eastern Catholic Churches it says that?

Because that seems unlikely, especially post-Vatican II, when the Eastern Catholic churches were encouraged to remove Latinizations from their liturgies (which was done with particular vigor in North America, so that the praxis at some Ukrainian Greek Catholic Churches and Ruthenian Greek Catholic Churches is identical to that of the Orthodox aside from prayers for the Pope in the Litany of Peace and the commemoration of the Pope in the Diptychs.

Additionally, are you aware that Byzantine Rite Catholics usually do not recite the Filioque, and in the case of the Greek Catholic Church (the actual Greek one, which uses the Greek language in worship), the recitation of the Filioque in Greek is prohibited?
 
Upvote 0

The Liturgist

Traditional Liturgical Christian
Site Supporter
Nov 26, 2019
16,788
9,002
51
The Wild West
✟878,413.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Generic Orthodox Christian
Marital Status
Celibate
That is a tradition I subscribe to also.

Me too. Despite our differences over issues like Papal Supremacy, there is still much that Eastern Orthodox, Oriental Orthodox, Roman Catholics and other traditional liturgical Christians such as Anglo Catholics and Confessional Lutherans have in common.
 
Upvote 0

The Liturgist

Traditional Liturgical Christian
Site Supporter
Nov 26, 2019
16,788
9,002
51
The Wild West
✟878,413.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Generic Orthodox Christian
Marital Status
Celibate
No, I am saying that we don't know.

Aside from Church Tradition, which cannot simply be ignored, since the same people who propagated it to us were responsible for, among other things, determining the Canon of the New Testament, it logically makes no sense for Christ our True God to entrust the care of His mother, our glorious lady Theotokos and Ever Virgin Mary, to one of his disciples, if St. Joseph were still alive. The complete disappearance of St. Joseph from the Gospel narrative indicates he was either deceased or permanently incapacitated, which would mean that he was likely dying, given the limitations of first century medical care, particularly in the less developed provinces of the Roman Empire such as Judaea.
 
Upvote 0

The Liturgist

Traditional Liturgical Christian
Site Supporter
Nov 26, 2019
16,788
9,002
51
The Wild West
✟878,413.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Generic Orthodox Christian
Marital Status
Celibate
This quote is difficult to find in translation without spending money, but several sites indicate the following:

Basil of Caesarea, Homily on the Holy Nativity of Christ

For "he did not know her" - it says - "until she gave birth to a Son, her firstborn." But this could make one suppose that Mary, after having offered in all her purity her own service in giving birth to the Lord, by virtue of the Holy Spirit, did not subsequently refrain from normal conjugal relations. That would not have affected the teaching of our religion at all, because Mary's virginity was necessary until the service of the Incarnation, and what happened afterward need not be investigated in order to affect the doctrine of the mystery. But since the lovers of Christ do not allow themselves to hear that the Mother of God ceased at a given moment to be a virgin, we consider their testimony sufficient. -- St. Basil the Great​
Here is the Greek text:​
Οὐκ ἐγίνωσκε γὰρ αὐ τὴν, φησὶν, ἕως οὗ ἔτεκε τὸν υἱὸν αὑτῆς τὸν πρω τότοκον.» Τοῦτο δὲ ἤδη ὑπόνοιαν​
παρέχει, ὅτι μετὰ τὸ καθαρῶς ὑπηρετήσασθαι τῇ γεννήσει τοῦ Κυρίου τῇ ἐπιτελεσθείσῃ διὰ τοῦ Πνεύματος τοῦ ἁγίου, τὰ νενομισμένα τοῦ γάμου ἔργα μὴ ἀπαρνησαμένης τῆς Μαρίας. Ἡμεῖς δὲ, εἰ καὶ μηδὲν τῷ τῆς εὐσεβείας παραλυμαίνεται λόγῳ (μέχρι γὰρ τῆς κατὰ τὴν οἰκονομίαν ὑπηρεσίας ἀναγκαία ἡ παρθενία, τὸ δ' ἐφεξῆς ἀπολυπραγμόνητον τῷ λόγῳ τοῦ μυστηρίου), ὅμως διὰ τὸ μὴ καταδέχεσθαι τῶν φιλοχρίστων τὴν ἀκοὴν, ὅτι ποτὲ ἐπαύσατο εἶναι παρθένος ἡ Θεοτόκος, ἐκείνας ἡγούμεθα τὰς μαρτυρίας αὐτάρ κεις.​

Yet nonetheless St. Basil the Great agreed with the perpetual virginity of the Theotokos, which at the time was disputed only by the Antidicomarians and a few other related groups, which were duly catalogued by St. Epiphanios of Salamis, and phrased the above as hypothetical.

What you are doing is basically Patristic eisegesis. Like Scripture, the Church Fathers have to be read in context - one cannot take an individual saying of a church father and use it in isolation. This principle is recognized by the Orthodox, Catholics and Protestants - indeed it was the Calvinists who coined the phrase “consensus patrum” since their approach to Patristics was to search for agreement between different early church fathers. I say was, because unfortunately, among non-fundamentalist Calvinists, due to a combination of liberalism on the one hand and the “Neo-Orthodoxy” of Karl Barth on the other (which is less interested in Patristics or Tradition than John Calvin and “paleo-Orthodox” Calvinists) followed by various fractious debates within the conservative Calvinists such as proponents of “Federal Vision” theology, so that the brief unity provided by the impressive Church Dogmatics of Karl Barth did not endure, while there still are many Calvinist theologians with an interest in Patristics, they no longer engage in the kind of large-scale Patristic scholarship they were once known for, which resulted in the translation into English and publication of much Patristic material. Nowadays, this sort of thing is engaged in chiefly by Orthodox and Anglicans, with significant contributions from Roman Catholics particularly during the papacy of Benedict XVI, memory eternal, who was himself clearly a man who loved the study of Patristics.
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
Reactions: jas3
Upvote 0

prodromos

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Nov 28, 2003
24,856
16,226
60
Sydney, Straya
✟1,568,577.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
  • Given there is a a conflicting tradition, seeing the brothers not as sons of Joseph from a prior marriage, but as other relatives, how do you reconcile the existence of these two streams, and why do you pick the one that lines up with the proto gospel of James?
It is the tradition passed down in the Church in Jerusalem. All the relatives of Jesus had been active in the early Church and knowledge of them had been retained among Christians in Jerusalem.
  • How much of the material in the proto gospel of James do you consider reliable, and how much was addition to what you perceive as an existing tradition?
It is my understanding that most, if not all, lines up with the teaching of the Church.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: The Liturgist
Upvote 0

The Liturgist

Traditional Liturgical Christian
Site Supporter
Nov 26, 2019
16,788
9,002
51
The Wild West
✟878,413.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Generic Orthodox Christian
Marital Status
Celibate
I was asking regarding the Eastern Orthodox view, partly based on the article I posted earlier discussing an aspect of their liturgy that draws on the proto gospel of James.

I won’t speak for Roman Catholics, but in Orthodoxy, Tradition has the Bible at its center, and then radiates outward through the Ecumenical Council and the writings of the Fathers, but the most definitive source of Orthodox doctrine and Sacred Tradition comes from the liturgy itself. One can glean a fair amount from the liturgical texts, which I can help you access, although to really truly appreciate it, one should attend an Orthodox church in person, since there are many details that will not be obvious from the texts and the rubrics, some of which can also be obtained by viewing Orthodox liturgies on YouTube, and I can also link you to some of this material if desired.

If you want a more in depth look at Orthodox-specific views on the subject of the Theotokos and her perpetual virginity, I would recommend Orthodox Dogmatic Theology by Protopresbyter Michael Pomazansky, as translated by Fr. Seraphim Rose, among other works, and I would be happy to assist you in accessing this material.

I am here to help. I might come across as prickly when it comes to defending Orthodox doctrine, but I have had the pleasure of interacting with you on ChristianForums for some years now, and I do regard you as a friend, and I am prepared to assist you in learning about Orthodoxy.
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
Reactions: prodromos
Upvote 0

prodromos

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Nov 28, 2003
24,856
16,226
60
Sydney, Straya
✟1,568,577.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
Since the Word of God does not tell us whether Joseph was previously married or whether Mary died, opinions of learned Catholics on those subject differ.
This is where Rome parts ways with the Church. The death of Mary (Dormition) was celebrated liturgically throughout the Church including Rome until Rome started to innovate in their teaching about Mary. If it is in the Liturgy then it absolutely is the teaching of the Church.
 
Upvote 0

The Liturgist

Traditional Liturgical Christian
Site Supporter
Nov 26, 2019
16,788
9,002
51
The Wild West
✟878,413.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Generic Orthodox Christian
Marital Status
Celibate
It is the tradition passed down in the Church in Jerusalem. All the relatives of Jesus had been active in the early Church and knowledge of them had been retained among Christians in Jerusalem.

Indeed. And it should be stressed, lest there is any confusion, that the Romans were never able to completely remove all Christians from the Hagiopolis (Jerusalem, the Holy City), but during the period between the partial destruction of Jerusalem in 130 AD and its restoration by St. Helena in the 4th century, the Hagiopolitan church continued in exile, with some of its members joining the churches in Antioch and Alexandria, the two other ancient centers of Eastern Christianity, which would form the Pentarchy with the rebuilt Jerusalem, Old Rome, and New Rome (Constantinople) starting in the fourth century, while many other Hagiopolitan Christians settled closer to Jerusalem, in places such as Caesarea, Tyre and Damascus, while still others became involved in the Syriac speaking church, which stretched from Damascus through Edessa, Nisibis, and the Nineveh plains to Seleucia-Cstesiphon and the Mesopotamian port cities, from which the church was connected by sea to Kerala, India, where St. Thomas the Apostle was martyred. Indeed one could argue that Caesarea, which became a major center of learning and was home to Eusebius, the great church historian, functioned to some extent as the seat of the Hagiopolitan Church in Exile.

It is worth noting that all of the local churches in the Eastern Mediterranean, Syria, Mesopotamia and India that I have mentioned had a significant number of members descended from converts from Judaism, which they retain to this day. Indeed, in India, and Ethiopia (which was historically influenced liturgically by Syriac speaking Christians, despite being under the Patriarchate of Alexandria - this is why their Divine Liturgies are structured like those of Antioch rather than following the distinctive Egyptian model; this was likely due to the fact that the Ethiopians spoke a Semitic language, Ge’ez, and the other major group of Semitic Christians were those who spoke various Aramaic languages such as Syriac, whereas the Alexandrian church operated mainly in Greek and Coptic), there are groups of Christians that are mostly or entirely of Jewish descent.
 
  • Like
Reactions: prodromos
Upvote 0

The Liturgist

Traditional Liturgical Christian
Site Supporter
Nov 26, 2019
16,788
9,002
51
The Wild West
✟878,413.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Generic Orthodox Christian
Marital Status
Celibate
This is where Rome parts ways with the Church. The death of Mary (Dormition) was celebrated liturgically throughout the Church including Rome until Rome started to innovate in their teaching about Mary. If it is in the Liturgy then it absolutely is the teaching of the Church.

Indeed, this is quite correct. My understanding is that a majority of Roman Catholics believe that the Theotokos died at the time of the Dormition, but the lack of doctrinal certainty on this is peculiar.

I also have to confess I find it strange that the Assumption or Dormition was not officially defined as a doctrine in the Roman Catholic Church until the reign of Pope Pius XII in the 1950s! Whereas for the Orthodox, this matter had been settled since antiquity.

What is even more peculiar on this note, is that the liturgies of the Byzantine Rite Greek Catholic Churches agree with the Eastern Orthodox on this, as on other things. I don’t understand how you can have a liturgy declare something in one liturgical rite of the church, without that declaration being dogmatic throughout the entire church. It violates the principle of lex orandi, lex credendi.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: prodromos
Upvote 0

David Lamb

Well-Known Member
May 30, 2024
4,637
2,945
76
Paignton
✟113,010.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
The Roman Catholic Church teaches the doctrine of the perpetual virginity of Mary. This doctrine holds that Mary was a virgin before, during, and after the birth of Jesus Christ. It is one of the four Marian dogmas and is deeply rooted in Catholic tradition and theology.
  • Early Church Fathers: This belief was supported by early Christian theologians and Church Fathers such as Augustine, Ambrose, and Jerome.
  • Councils and Declarations: The doctrine has been affirmed in various Church councils and teachings, including the Lateran Council of 649 and in the writings of Pope St. Leo the Great.

The story is that Mary was raised in the temple. At 12, the young girls rejoiced when they left the temple to get married. Only Mary took a vow of celibacy before God. So the priest paired her with Joseph, who was a widower. His youngest child, James, was 12, and Mary raised James. His older children were already married. They placed his rod before the altar, and it budded as a sign that this was from God.

The idea that Mary, the mother of Jesus, was raised in the temple comes from apocryphal sources, particularly the Protoevangelium of James. This non-canonical gospel, written in the second century, provides details about Mary's early life that are not found in the canonical Gospels.
Things like Roman Catholic tradition, and the Protoevangelium of James are not God's Word.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Aaron112
Upvote 0

Diamond72

Dispensationalist 72
Nov 23, 2022
8,303
1,522
73
Akron
✟57,941.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Married
Things like Roman Catholic tradition, and the Protoevangelium of James are not God's Word.
There are a lot of posts in this thread so you must not have read the one that talks about how they do not claim or endorse the Apocrypha. Their traditions is a catch 22. Jesus criticized the Pharisees and teachers of the law for prioritizing human traditions over God's commandments. But we would not have a Bible if it were not for the oral tradition. For example, our English Bible is not a translation of the Hebrew Bible. It is a translation of the Greek Bible that was a translation of the Hebrew Bible that was an oral tradition before it was recorded. That pretty much makes it impossible for the Bible to be fully accurate but it is because God Himself watches over His word. I am sure you know how difficult that is because God watches over every word we say and is quick to correct us if we say anything that is not accurate and true. Even I like to joke around but we have to be very careful about that as Christians.

My father was very much a man of his word. If he said he would do something, he did it. A lot of people are not like that at all. Just the opposite. You can count on them NOT to do what they say they are going to do.
 
Upvote 0

Valletta

Well-Known Member
Oct 10, 2020
13,610
6,590
Minnesota
✟364,180.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Things like Roman Catholic tradition, and the Protoevangelium of James are not God's Word.
Sacred Tradition and Sacred Scripture comprise God's Word. Mere traditions, Catholic or Protestant, are not. For example, Catholic believe in one God, Three Persons. That is Sacred Tradition.
 
Upvote 0

David Lamb

Well-Known Member
May 30, 2024
4,637
2,945
76
Paignton
✟113,010.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Sacred Tradition and Sacred Scripture comprise God's Word. Mere traditions, Catholic or Protestant, are not. For example, Catholic believe in one God, Three Persons. That is Sacred Tradition.
No so. Protestants also believe in one God, three Persons, because it is in the bible, not tradition, whether sacred or otherwise.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Aaron112
Upvote 0

Valletta

Well-Known Member
Oct 10, 2020
13,610
6,590
Minnesota
✟364,180.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Things like Roman Catholic tradition, and the Protoevangelium of James are not God's Word.
The Protoevangelium of James was never declared as God's Word by the Catholic Church. Realize that the Church existed before one word of the New Testament was written. The early "kanon" of the Catholic Church included the customs and the disciplines and oral teachings received from the Apostles centuries before the canon of the Bible was decided upon by the Catholic Church. Remember too that the canon of the Bible was decided upon by the Catholic Church to make sure only Holy Scripture was read at mass.
 
Upvote 0

David Lamb

Well-Known Member
May 30, 2024
4,637
2,945
76
Paignton
✟113,010.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
The Protoevangelium of James was never declared as God's Word by the Catholic Church. Realize that the Church existed before one word of the New Testament was written. The early "kanon" of the Catholic Church included the customs and the disciplines and oral teachings received from the Apostles centuries before the canon of the Bible was decided upon by the Catholic Church. Remember too that the canon of the Bible was decided upon by the Catholic Church to make sure only Holy Scripture was read at mass.
The church existed, yes, but not Roman Catholicism.
 
Upvote 0

tall73

Sophia7's husband
Site Supporter
Sep 23, 2005
32,792
6,175
Visit site
✟1,122,245.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Upvote 0

tall73

Sophia7's husband
Site Supporter
Sep 23, 2005
32,792
6,175
Visit site
✟1,122,245.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Yet nonetheless St. Basil the Great agreed with the perpetual virginity of the Theotokos,

I included the portion of the quote where he acknowledged holding to the view, and did the same with the quotes by Origen and Clement of Alexandria. I have referenced, so far, others as well, such as Justin Martyr, Chrysostom, The proto gospel of James, Epiphanius, etc.

which at the time was disputed only by the Antidicomarians and a few other related groups, which were duly catalogued by St. Epiphanios of Salamis, and phrased the above as hypothetical.
What you are doing is basically Patristic eisegesis. Like Scripture, the Church Fathers have to be read in context - one cannot take an individual saying of a church father and use it in isolation.

I have read the earliest literature in context. However, by the time we get to the fourth century, there is a massive amount of extant literature if one were to read it all in context, and i have not managed to do so yet.

But that is why I am going through and finding those statements that relate to the topic.

If your contention is that someone must have read all of the literature in total of the various fathers to glean anything from their specific statements on a given topic, then that is a noble standard. However, you may be speaking to only yourself in this thread, if indeed you have read all of Augustine, Chrysostom, Origen, etc. and even then more of their writings may yet be uncovered that are referred to , but not known.

I am not going to take the approach I must read everything they wrote before I can try to understand any of it. I simply don't have time.

I have stated I don't hold a view one way or the other. I am trying to look at what the various statements are saying, partly because some in the thread were earlier stating that only one person was disagreeing with it up to the fourth century.

The quotes so far suggest that there were more who disagreed with various aspects, and there were two main streams of understanding the details.

I have not disputed that by the fourth century it was the dominant position, clearly, and was later referenced in a council.

But I do not think it is fair to say I am engaging in eisegesis because I am looking at various quotes available, to see what they say. Eisegesis would be reading in my thoughts. I am trying to see what their thoughts were, and what commonalities and differences there are.

I understand that your approach would be to start with what the churches agree upon--I see that. But I am trying to understand how it got to that point, because I am not approaching it the way that you do. Moreover, there are two different approaches generally to tradition, development, etc. among Catholic and Orthodox churches, and I am trying to get a better handle on those, through this same discussion.

Because I do not object either way initially to either view, this seems like a good topic to do so. I am more doubtful of the view that Mary was sinless, so I am not using that as a test case.

Regarding this topic, and the particulars of the tradition, when I see that Jerome and Chrysostom seem to be agreed that they were relatives of James, but not children from a prior marriage, but that Origen cites the proto gospel of James in support of the other, etc. it tells me it is more complicated than simply a handed down tradition.

I have visited an orthodox service, watched them online, listened to Ancient Faith radio podcasts, read Kalistos Ware's accessible material, discussed with Orthodox, etc.

My father was Catholic.

But since the tradition I grew up in (Seventh-day Adventist) was rather hostile to the early church writings, and decidedly hostile towards Catholic theology, it has taken me time to familiarize myself with the primary source material. And I think it makes sense to read that material first on a given topic for what it says, when you have two different understandings of the particulars in that material.

I will try to get through some of the material posted as soon as possible. But this is the busiest week of the year for my company as well. I just wanted to ask the prompting questions so folks could outline their view for later reading.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: prodromos
Upvote 0