I do apologize for the insults that was wrong of me and shows my need for Jesus.
Christ defines the 7 churches as the 7 candlesticks in Rev1.
Agree or disagree?
I have to say disagree the O.T. reference for these verses are in Exodus: "And thou shalt make the lamps thereof, seven: and they shall light the lamps thereof, to give light over against it."
"3And he made the lamps thereof, seven, and the snuffers thereof, and the snuff dishes thereof, of pure gold." The Lamp stands represent the churches not define the church. Plus we know from history that at that time there were more the seven churches. Even if they did define the church and they dont it would not be the entire church. The Picture then is of Jesus in His role of High Priest in the mist of the churches ready to move out in Judgment. All the symbols in the Book of Revelation are explained elsewhere: either in a different part of the Book of Revelation or in some other part of the Bible. When there are symbols, the Bible itself will explain what these symbols mean either by direct statement or through a comparison of the usage of the symbol elsewhere in the Scriptures. The use of Lamp stand here symbolizes a witness, the local church is to be a witness, and if it fails to do so, then the high priest can remove it.
and He further defines them individually in Rev2-3.
Agree or disagree?
Disagree!
2 of the 7 are not chastised as the others are...Smyrna and Philadelphia, who share a common doctrine. Agree or disagree?
Disagree!
and we see the 2 candlesticks with the 2 olive trees (as the two witnesses) against the beast in Rev11. Agree or disagree?
Disagree that is a big leap just because two are chastised doesnt automatically make them the two witnesses. That is Prooftexting the practice of using decontextualised quotations from a document to establish a proposition rhetorically. There are other problems by saying the two witnesses are two churches first they have supernatural abilities like to kill men by fire, cause drought by withholding rain, turn water to blood, cause other plagues. Churches cant do that. And rev.11:1-13 tells us that the Antichrist will overcome them and kill them. And that is a direct contradiction of scripture where Jesus has said the Gates of Hell will not prevail against the church. Plus we are told that there ministry is only in Jerusalem. The church is worldwide. A better interpretation is that the two witnesses are two men whom the LORD will raise up during the tribulation itself.
so I do not understand how you can say that the church is gone, when we see them against the beast?
the elect are in the church...and they are certainly mentioned. The Saints are the church, and they are mentioned.
The church is gone for many reasons on being the LORD has not destined us for wrath Jesus took that for us at the cross and the Tribulation Is Gods wrath starting at Revelation 5:1. If you are saying that the church needs to go through the Tribulation you are saying the crucifixion of Jesus was not sufficient. And that is error.
The elect are sometimes referred to as the church and sometimes referred to as Israel so get specific. The saints are not the church there are saints in the church. The bible describes three groups of Saints. There are church saints; there are O.T. saints, and tribulations saints. The saints I think you are referring to are the tribulation saints and is not the ruptured church.
the point is to be working for Christ when He returns, and the vast majority of work to be done is to be done in that last hour of temptation. God always tries His people, and we are all going into captivity, just as the types suggest. Now, will you follow the world in this captivity, or will you stay faithful to Christ and wait for Him, in your patience possess ye your souls.
Are you saying that we need to work for our salvation?
and a strait forward fact is that 2Thes2 states very clearly that the Gathering to Christ happens AFTER the apostasy and the son of Perdition be revealed for who he reavealed
verses 1-2 Paul makes the point that the TRIBULATION could not have come yet because of two events. First the apostasy ( not rapture) of the church. Second the revelation of the man of sin, the son of perdition. There is to be a revelation of the identity of Antichrist that precedes the Tribulation and it is for the believers living at that time. The Rapture may or may not have occurred by then, since the scriptures do not state just how long before the tribulation the Rapture will occur. Therefore, this revelation to believers before the tribulation may be to the Church if the Rapture has not occurred, or it may be to the new body the of believers the tribulation saints who have accepted the gospel after the rapture of the church. The text does NOT state exactly how this revelation will come.But the scriptures indicate that this revelation may come because of two things. Since the tribulation will begin with the signing of the seven year covenant (Daniel 9:27) between Israel and the Antichrist. When this covenant is announced, believers may become aware of the identity of the Antichrist. or believers will deduce who he is by the numerical value of his name, which will be 666. The main points of II Thessalonians 2:1-12 appear to be: to comfort believers of Thessalonica, letting them know that they are not in the tribulation, nor has the tribulation arrived. To teach that there will be two separate revelations of the Antichrist at different points in time. And two things are being restrained: the mystery of lawlessness in Gereral now, and the Antichrist specifically in the future.
Mar13 says that the gathering is AFTER the trib of those end days, that hour when Satan tempts the population of the earth.
Mark 13 what?
Christ defines the 7 churches as the 7 candlesticks in Rev1.
Agree or disagree?
I have to say disagree the O.T. reference for these verses are in Exodus: "And thou shalt make the lamps thereof, seven: and they shall light the lamps thereof, to give light over against it."
"3And he made the lamps thereof, seven, and the snuffers thereof, and the snuff dishes thereof, of pure gold." The Lamp stands represent the churches not define the church. Plus we know from history that at that time there were more the seven churches. Even if they did define the church and they dont it would not be the entire church. The Picture then is of Jesus in His role of High Priest in the mist of the churches ready to move out in Judgment. All the symbols in the Book of Revelation are explained elsewhere: either in a different part of the Book of Revelation or in some other part of the Bible. When there are symbols, the Bible itself will explain what these symbols mean either by direct statement or through a comparison of the usage of the symbol elsewhere in the Scriptures. The use of Lamp stand here symbolizes a witness, the local church is to be a witness, and if it fails to do so, then the high priest can remove it.
and He further defines them individually in Rev2-3.
Agree or disagree?
Disagree!
2 of the 7 are not chastised as the others are...Smyrna and Philadelphia, who share a common doctrine. Agree or disagree?
Disagree!
and we see the 2 candlesticks with the 2 olive trees (as the two witnesses) against the beast in Rev11. Agree or disagree?
Disagree that is a big leap just because two are chastised doesnt automatically make them the two witnesses. That is Prooftexting the practice of using decontextualised quotations from a document to establish a proposition rhetorically. There are other problems by saying the two witnesses are two churches first they have supernatural abilities like to kill men by fire, cause drought by withholding rain, turn water to blood, cause other plagues. Churches cant do that. And rev.11:1-13 tells us that the Antichrist will overcome them and kill them. And that is a direct contradiction of scripture where Jesus has said the Gates of Hell will not prevail against the church. Plus we are told that there ministry is only in Jerusalem. The church is worldwide. A better interpretation is that the two witnesses are two men whom the LORD will raise up during the tribulation itself.
so I do not understand how you can say that the church is gone, when we see them against the beast?
the elect are in the church...and they are certainly mentioned. The Saints are the church, and they are mentioned.
The church is gone for many reasons on being the LORD has not destined us for wrath Jesus took that for us at the cross and the Tribulation Is Gods wrath starting at Revelation 5:1. If you are saying that the church needs to go through the Tribulation you are saying the crucifixion of Jesus was not sufficient. And that is error.
The elect are sometimes referred to as the church and sometimes referred to as Israel so get specific. The saints are not the church there are saints in the church. The bible describes three groups of Saints. There are church saints; there are O.T. saints, and tribulations saints. The saints I think you are referring to are the tribulation saints and is not the ruptured church.
the point is to be working for Christ when He returns, and the vast majority of work to be done is to be done in that last hour of temptation. God always tries His people, and we are all going into captivity, just as the types suggest. Now, will you follow the world in this captivity, or will you stay faithful to Christ and wait for Him, in your patience possess ye your souls.
Are you saying that we need to work for our salvation?
and a strait forward fact is that 2Thes2 states very clearly that the Gathering to Christ happens AFTER the apostasy and the son of Perdition be revealed for who he reavealed
verses 1-2 Paul makes the point that the TRIBULATION could not have come yet because of two events. First the apostasy ( not rapture) of the church. Second the revelation of the man of sin, the son of perdition. There is to be a revelation of the identity of Antichrist that precedes the Tribulation and it is for the believers living at that time. The Rapture may or may not have occurred by then, since the scriptures do not state just how long before the tribulation the Rapture will occur. Therefore, this revelation to believers before the tribulation may be to the Church if the Rapture has not occurred, or it may be to the new body the of believers the tribulation saints who have accepted the gospel after the rapture of the church. The text does NOT state exactly how this revelation will come.But the scriptures indicate that this revelation may come because of two things. Since the tribulation will begin with the signing of the seven year covenant (Daniel 9:27) between Israel and the Antichrist. When this covenant is announced, believers may become aware of the identity of the Antichrist. or believers will deduce who he is by the numerical value of his name, which will be 666. The main points of II Thessalonians 2:1-12 appear to be: to comfort believers of Thessalonica, letting them know that they are not in the tribulation, nor has the tribulation arrived. To teach that there will be two separate revelations of the Antichrist at different points in time. And two things are being restrained: the mystery of lawlessness in Gereral now, and the Antichrist specifically in the future.
Mar13 says that the gathering is AFTER the trib of those end days, that hour when Satan tempts the population of the earth.
Mark 13 what?
Upvote
0