↑
In case you don't know,
adults generally have real fingers.
.............!!!NEWS-FLASH!!!............
REAL FINGERS RECENTLY FOUND
.....ON BABIES IN THE WOMB......
Oh sure.
Finally! We get to agree on at least something!! Hooray!!!
Facts of reality, logic, and commons sense...
Your "headline" claims there are real fingers in the womb - when it uses the term "babies" for what is found there is at best a linguistic distortion.
Now c'mon... Are you seriously going to argue that babies do not live in the womb before they are born?
Don't you know that this is udderly indefensible?
That there are no fingers in the womb prior to birth, but that suddenly, upon uterine deposition, the hands in that event all of a sudden now have fingers???
And in case you don't know it, the single cell embryo is not even flesh, has not even the barest possibility of having a finger.
Now you are arguing that embryos are not flesh... You must argue that amoebae are not flesh... Do you think that flesh is only what you can butcher and fry up a steak from?? And against your last, that humble single cell hypostasis has the ONLY possibility, indeed mandate, and tools, to HAVE a finger... YOU, Your Enhypostatic Excellence, do NOT have such a possibility nor a mandate, which is why feeble scientists seek to steal that possibility from those hypostases who DO have it...
Nazi's did the same when they looted Germany... Kill the owner and steal her wealth... It is a formulaic known since Cain killed Abel... The scientists simply go to the one who HAS the wealth that they do NOT have, and kill her and take her DNA...
But really, do you not think that fleshless embryo is a kind of oymoron???
Would that be an inorganic embryo?
Arsenios