Then perhaps you should be working on it instead of presenting it as truth on an irrelevant internet forum.
That doesn't really add much credibility to your ideas.
But I get excited about evidence, credibility and credentials.
You don't seem to have any of those. Sorry, but I have a hard time taking people seriously who spend their time writing their wild ideas on internet forums while pretending that those ideas tackle and solve problems that the brightest of the brightest (like Einstein, Hawking, Krauss, Kaku, etc etc etc etc) have made their life's work without success.
You get that, right?
I totally get that, DogmaHunter and a sincere thanks for the kick in the shorts.
You are quite correct. I have no official credentials. I have not gone to college. I have lived a great deal of my life alone, thinking and reading.
I write here because it's all I currently have in the limited time I have to apply. I get practice with both religionists and scientists which I will have to navigate fluently IRL. I am a new father and the full time foreman of a tree company. I do all the estimates, I upkeep and round up all the equipment and employees, including the 82 year old ailing boss....up top of all that, I am the lead climber. I have little to no time to get into concentrated writing.
I have been professionally climbing/trimming trees for over 13 years, I have played in them since a child.
My brain has been firing and wiring for perfect balance in respect to unwavering gravity and an unpredictable wind. I navigate a living fractal from the inside out while having to accurately imagine it from the outside in. I think in terms of super symmetry and mirror inversion as a background mental process. I estimate quantum divisions and free fall rotations as a constant. I have been practicing life and death, hands on physics for a long time now.
So if a surfer can consolidate the functions of string theory to a much more eloquent and workable set, I expect a professional arborist could tell you much about 4d entanglement, super-symmetry, multi-scalar self similarity of structure and dark matter hidden like branches behind the leaves of the visible world.
The most ubiquitous cultural symbol for all of life and the universe, is the majestic Tree.
I have one educate genius telling me my theory and model have profound ramifications for quantum gauge theory and he's going to pass my outline by his colleagues, some of the highest and most educated minds in the field of quantum mechanics.
And just yesterday a retired mathematics professor and enthusiastic friend unloaded thousands of dollars worth of books into my hands for free.
Titles include:
Quantum Mechanics and Path Integrals by Feynman and Hibbs
Sidelight on Relativity by Einstein
Quantum lines of spectra by Bohr
Principle of Relativity by Einstein, Lorentz, Weyl, and Minkowski
....among 55 other books of similar caliber. Should be fun right?
While I don't yet know the full modern language of mathematics. I have been practicing modeling, comparing, weighing, and accurately dividing large real fractal data sets in nature where no hard numbers exist. My life, career and family depend on my accuracy. So far so good! *knock knock knock*
So while in college I could have learned some of these things mentally and linguistically. Instead I have been immersed in physics bodily, mentally and spiritually for hours at a time, swaying by myself in the crown of a gigantic, multi-scalar, living being.
Next step is on the ground, learning the language of academia...or making new language where needed! Some of the principles I operate with have yet to be imagined by modern science. They tend to avoid Infinity and have to "renormalize" for it...I account for it from before the beginning. The "Beginning" is the Infinite's self quantization into finite 3d integer structures of universal forces within a voided space universe. An infinite number of them at the same instant, and the next, and the next...
All I need to account for them are my ten fingers. Much simpler math and a different nature of Number than mathematicians are use to thinking in. They are structural and simultaneously arising/entangled to me, not a linear string of 2d symbols.
So obviously, I still have a lot to learn.
