Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
The renovation was not exactly top secret material and the hijackers had an 80% chance of hitting where the most damage would be caused but miraculously hit the first floor of the newly reinforced wedge.
Sorry, but hitting something that's a 20% probability is hardly miraculous.
Quote correctly or not at all.
(The miraculous part was hitting the 1st floor)
Not sure if you consider me someone of integrity or not, but I'd like to see your explanation of who intended to hit the remodeled portion of the Pentagon.
Btodd will either ignore this or say "wow! another conspiracy the plot thickens!" as he was taught to by 911 disinformation, they pull cards from the rolodex depending on the situation, straw man, put words in peoples' mouths, ignore what you can't answer, ridicule. The pattern should be pretty obvious by now. But remember, the only reason there is any need to speculate as to what hit the Pentagon, or how the towers fell, is because the stamped-parts forensic evidence has been destroyed, just like 95% of the tower steel, and because the extensive video from the most heavily-surveillanced building in the world was destroyed or is being kept secret except for one snip which tells nothing.[FONT=Arial, Helvetica]One Army office in the Pentagon lost 34 of its 65 employees in the attack. Most of those killed in the office, called Resource Services Washington, were civilian accountants, bookkeepers and budget analysts. They were at their desks when American Airlines Flight 77 struck. [/FONT]
Why were the twin towers ground into dust and ejected laterally?
If there were no explosives in the twin towers, then the only force acting on the building at the time of collapse was the force of gravity. This force is pulling straight down through the center of the building. The vector diagram should have one large arrow pointing down.
However, what we actually see is enormous amounts of energy blowing the building outwards. This energy is directed perpendicular to the gravitational force. Where does this energy come from if not from explosives?
The majority of the building is ground into dust and blown outward as far as New Jersey. Observe photos of ground zero. There should be a pile with 110 floors of material at the bottom. However, most of the mass of the buildings was shredded to dust and blown away.
Why do independent investigators find high-energy explosives in WTC debris?
Independent investigators claim to have discovered high-energy explosives in the world trade center debris. The picture shows an unexploded piece of nano-thermite recovered from a world trade center dust sample. Nano-thermite is a high-tech explosive that was recently developed by defense department contractors at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. It is capable of reaching 4500 degrees within seconds and can easily cut steel. What is it doing in WTC dust samples?
It's not as if the NIST investigators don't know anything about nano-thermite. Interestingly, many of them are some of the world's most knowledgeable experts regarding nano-thermite and have been active in developing the technology.
Why did our air defenses ignore protocol and fail to protect the nation?
The U.S. has the most powerful and sophisticated air-force in the entire world. Domestic flights were intercepted 67 times in the nine months preceding 9/11. How was it possible that four hijacked aircraft where allowed to fly unmolested through U.S. airspace for over an hour and a half?
Was NORAD ordered to stand down?
How can a gravitational collapse melt steel and concrete?
Molten metal was present underneath the remains of all three world trade center towers. USGS aerial thermal imaging showed surface temperatures of over 800 degrees F five days after the attack. However, there were no fires at the surface. Aerial images were recording molten metal under the surface. There was even molten metal recorded flowing out of the towers before they came down, even though there was minimal fire. How could a gravitational collapse have caused this molten metal? (mathematical gravitational analysis)
FROM CHRISTIANS FOR 911 TRUTH
Umm their are only 5 floor, so it's one in five, and even better if I slide into it.
With a 757 by a guy who got rejected for a rental on a single engine cessna three weeks prior.
Yes. Flying isn't the hard part, Landing is, but they weren't landing, so even that's not that hard.
You should load up Flight Sim and give it a try, really easy once the 757 is in the air.
Fine. Five sides, five floors. 4% chance of hitting the side and floor they did. Still not miraculous.
Seriously, you danced all over the place to avoid answering a single, simple question. This phony act of indignance is childish.
Btodd
It really was Paris Hilton!
You ever find those people with less experience than hanjour duplicate the flight yet?
Hey, I still remember this act from years ago...not surprised that you're still a child.
Also, I hope nobody seriously entertains your current argument, which is the Texas Sharpshooter Fallacy. No matter 'where' Flight 77 hit the Pentagon, you could attribute it to a miraculous chance of hitting that particular spot.
Since you're the one who speculated that someone (that you won't answer a simple question about) 'intended' to hit it there, then it's not something anyone needs to defend...actually, YOU still do.
Incredulity is not an argument, nor an explanation.
Btodd
You claimed people with less experience than hanjour duplicated his flight path but you never provided any evidence backing that up.
Hani Hanjour was a trained to fly commercial jets.You conveniently ignore all the instructors who said he couldn't fly at all and instead choose to focus on one small slice. Nice job.
Page 225/227 said:In 1996, Hanjour returned to the United States to pursue flight training,after being rejected by a Saudi flight school. He checked out flight schools in Florida, California, and Arizona; and he briefly started at a couple of them before returning to Saudi Arabia. In 1997, he returned to Florida and then, along with two friends, went back to Arizona and began his flight training there in earnest. After about three months, Hanjour was able to obtain his private pilot's license. Several more months of training yielded him a commercial pilot certificate, issued by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) in April 199
Hani Hanjour was a trained to fly commercial jets.
was he the best pilot ? maybe not, but it doesn't take an super pilot to crash a jet.
I'm not defending anything, I'm questioning a small portion of your position.
I actually gave an argument, and you didn't like it. When asked to do the same thing, you made a joke out of who flew Flight 77. Classy stuff.
Now you've moved on to the Sharpshooter Fallacy, after previously having your mind blown by the fact that hitting one side of a 5-sided building was 20%. I think that says it all, sport.
Btodd
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?