• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

sparow

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Oct 7, 2014
2,737
452
86
✟570,419.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
Since God knows all better than we perceive them and becuz God uses all to His Will, and since salvation is offered to all... Hey, God is the potter. So yr asking abt mattering to us humans... But God is the only rightful judge.. Ya know

The covenant (Law) is offered to all and the ancestors of Muslims had access to it for six or seven hundred years before Islam came to them; Islam has always been an obstacle to the spreading of the faith of Jesus. God is the judge and He has given us the yard stick by which we will be judged; Muslims do not have that yard stick and have excuse but there is no salvation in excuse; Christians are without excuse.
 
Upvote 0

Emmy

Senior Veteran
Feb 15, 2004
10,200
940
✟66,005.00
Faith
Salvation Army
Dear thatbrian. The answer to your question is definitely NO. God made Man in God`s image, and if we claim to be in God`s Image, God will Love us all the same. What does God want from us? In Matthew 7: 7-10: we are told:
" Ask and you shall receive," clear and straightforward. What does God want from us? Jesus told us in Matthew 22: 35-40: " The first and great Commandment is: Love God with all thy heart, with all thy soul, and with all thy mind.
The second is like it: love thy neighbour as thyself. ( treat all you know and all you meet, as you would love to be treated)
For all of us who try and do God`s Will, we matter very much. I say this with love, thatbrian. Greetings from Emmy, your sister in Christ.
 
Upvote 0

dougangel

Regular
Site Supporter
May 7, 2012
1,423
238
New Zealand
✟130,556.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
I can accept Cristianoi means follower of Christ, but I don't have permission from Christ to use any man as an authority; whether it be the Church fathers, Ignatius, Polycarp or Paul. A person who abrogates the Law does not follow Christ but follows traditions of men instead. Most who call themselves Christian use only Christ's name but not his covenant.

I don't remember how we got started down track; it doesn't have anything to do Muslims but it does have to do with who is important. It is not worrying about labels it is wether the label is true or a lie; among other things any definition of Christian includes being a follower of Christ; Most who call themselves Christian use only Christ's name and use men as their teachers; they follow men not Christ who is prophesised to accuse them of Lawlessness.

Its just different languages. There's nothing wrong with saying Christian.
 
Upvote 0

dougangel

Regular
Site Supporter
May 7, 2012
1,423
238
New Zealand
✟130,556.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Dear thatbrian. The answer to your question is definitely NO. God made Man in God`s image, and if we claim to be in God`s Image, God will Love us all the same. What does God want from us? In Matthew 7: 7-10: we are told:
" Ask and you shall receive," clear and straightforward. What does God want from us? Jesus told us in Matthew 22: 35-40: " The first and great Commandment is: Love God with all thy heart, with all thy soul, and with all thy mind.
The second is like it: love thy neighbour as thyself. ( treat all you know and all you meet, as you would love to be treated)
For all of us who try and do God`s Will, we matter very much. I say this with love, thatbrian. Greetings from Emmy, your sister in Christ.

John 4:24

God is spirit, and his worshipers must worship in the Spirit and in truth.”

When you talk about God making man in his image. Then seems to be a lot of different interpretations of this. I believe it means spiritual character or nature of God. Man having this spiritual image is what seems to make us different to other biological creatures on earth.
 
Upvote 0

jimmyjimmy

Pardoned Rebel
Site Supporter
Jan 2, 2015
11,556
5,727
USA
✟280,003.00
Country
United States
Faith
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Married
My comment was a general contribution to the discussion and does not address anyone specifically.

I don't think that Christ would pass your test.

He also who had received the one talent came forward, saying, ‘Master, I knew you to be a hard man, reaping where you did not sow, and gathering where you scattered no seed, 25so I was afraid, and I went and hid your talent in the ground. Here you have what is yours.’ 26But his master answered him, ‘You wicked and slothful servant! You knew that I reap where I have not sown and gather where I scattered no seed? 27Then you ought to have invested my money with the bankers, and at my coming I should have received what was my own with interest. 28So take the talent from him and give it to him who has the ten talents. 29For to everyone who has will more be given, and he will have an abundance. But from the one who has not, even what he has will be taken away. 30And cast the worthless servant into the outer darkness. In that place there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth.’

What then? Are we Jews any better off? No, not at all. For we have already charged that all, both Jews and Greeks, are under sin, as it is written: “None is righteous, no, not one; no one understands; no one seeks for God. All have turned aside; together they have become worthless; no one does good, not even one.”​
 
Upvote 0

expos4ever

Well-Known Member
Oct 22, 2008
11,277
6,254
Montreal, Quebec
✟321,303.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
.....But from the one who has not, even what he has will be taken away. 30And cast the worthless servant into the outer darkness. In that place there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth.’

......What then? Are we Jews any better off? No, not at all. For we have already charged that all, both Jews and Greeks, are under sin, as it is written: “None is righteous, no, not one; no one understands; no one seeks for God. All have turned aside; together they have become worthless; no one does good, not even one.
What I think you are implying here is clearly not sustainable from the broad scriptural picture. Yes, Jesus does describe a fictional character as "worthless", but you take a huge leap in inferring, if that is what you are doing, that Jesus (or God) actually sees people as being of different levels of "worth".

In context, the servant is described as worthless in the very specific sense that the person has not fulfilled their obligation to be a good steward; it is a huge leap to conclude that God sees some as more worthy than others.

And we know that scripture clearly presents an image of a God who sees all humans as of equal worth in the most important sense - we are all equally offered the gift of membership in God's family.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dougangel
Upvote 0

expos4ever

Well-Known Member
Oct 22, 2008
11,277
6,254
Montreal, Quebec
✟321,303.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
But if anyone does not provide for his relatives, and especially for members of his household, he has denied the faith and is worse than an unbeliever.
This text certainly does not, by itself, offer any support to the notion that you should use force to defend your family.

Luke 22:36
He said to them, “But now let the one who has a moneybag take it, and likewise a knapsack. And let the one who has no sword sell his cloak and buy one.

The following text, from Luke 22, is often used to support the right to use weapons in self-defence:

And He said to them, "But now, whoever has a money belt is to take it along, likewise also a bag, and whoever has no sword is to sell his coat and buy one.
37"For I tell you that this which is written must be fulfilled in Me, 'AND HE WAS NUMBERED WITH TRANSGRESSORS'; for that which refers to Me has its fulfillment." 38They said, "Lord, look, here are two swords." And He said to them, "It is enough.
"

Obviously a “superficial” reading suggests that Jesus is advocating the “right” to use weapons. However, the fact that such a reading is deeply at odds with other things Jesus teaches should be a tip-off that things are not as they appear. And indeed, such is the case here. When this text is understood in broader context, we realize that Jesus is not making any kind of a case for the right to bear arms (swords or otherwise).

In order to arrive at the correct interpretation, we really need to step back and ask ourselves what Jesus’ larger purpose was in this dialogue. Note the connective “for” at the beginning of verse 37. It suggests that the material which follows is an explanation or amplification on the point just made – that the followers of Jesus are to sell their coats and buy a sword. So what is Jesus’ larger purpose?

It is that He been seen as a transgressor. Jesus is intentionally orchestrating things so that the Jewish authorities will have plausible grounds for arresting Him. Of course, appearing as part of an armed band would be precisely the ideal scenario to ensure Jesus’ arrest. Remember the “for” at the beginning of verse 37. If we are to be careful students of what Jesus is saying, we need to take seriously what Jesus says in verses 37 and 38 as qualifying and explaining his statement about buying a sword. We cannot simply gloss the text and conclude “Look, Jesus is making some kind of general statement about the right to self-defence with weapons”.

In fact, this very specific focus on the intent to be seen as a transgressor is powerfully sustained by Jesus’ statement that there is prophecy that He (Jesus) must be seen as a transgressor.

Remember the incident in the temple with Jesus overthrowing the tables of the moneychangers. This is not, as many people think, merely a repudiation of the sin of materialism. It is also a shrewd provocation on the part of Jesus. By creating a ruckus in the temple, He is forcing the hand of the Jewish leaders – they cannot allow such behaviour, Jesus must be arrested soon.

This is why, in the next verse, when the disciples say they have two swords, Jesus says “It is enough.” Obviously, if Jesus ever intended for the disciples to use the swords, two swords would not be nearly enough in any kind of armed action. But it’s enough to fulfill the prophecy by making Jesus appear to be participating in a violent revolutionary movement of some kind.

Unlike the “Jesus is supporting the right to bear arms” interpretation, note how the above interpretation makes sense of the entire account. If Jesus was really making some general statement about a “right to bear arms”, how exactly does that contribute to His being numbered with transgressors? And how does that make sense of the limit of two swords? Such a “right to bear arms” interpretation makes sense of neither. So it is almost certainly an incorrect interpretation of Jesus’ statement about buying a couple of swords.
 
Upvote 0

Mary Roberts

New Member
Jul 24, 2016
4
0
46
melbourne
✟22,614.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
I don't think that Christ would pass your test.

He also who had received the one talent came forward, saying, ‘Master, I knew you to be a hard man, reaping where you did not sow, and gathering where you scattered no seed, 25so I was afraid, and I went and hid your talent in the ground. Here you have what is yours.’ 26But his master answered him, ‘You wicked and slothful servant! You knew that I reap where I have not sown and gather where I scattered no seed? 27Then you ought to have invested my money with the bankers, and at my coming I should have received what was my own with interest. 28So take the talent from him and give it to him who has the ten talents. 29For to everyone who has will more be given, and he will have an abundance. But from the one who has not, even what he has will be taken away. 30And cast the worthless servant into the outer darkness. In that place there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth.’

What then? Are we Jews any better off? No, not at all. For we have already charged that all, both Jews and Greeks, are under sin, as it is written: “None is righteous, no, not one; no one understands; no one seeks for God. All have turned aside; together they have become worthless; no one does good, not even one.”​

It is unfortunate if you thought I was offering a 'test' of any sort. Never mind.
 
Upvote 0

jimmyjimmy

Pardoned Rebel
Site Supporter
Jan 2, 2015
11,556
5,727
USA
✟280,003.00
Country
United States
Faith
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Married
It is unfortunate if you thought I was offering a 'test' of any sort. Never mind.

Did you post "blind" (not take the time to read through the previous posts), or did you bring yourself up to speed by going though the previous posts? It's been an interesting discussion, so I would suggest reading through it.
 
Upvote 0

samir

Well-Known Member
Dec 9, 2015
2,274
580
us
✟18,067.00
Faith
Christian Seeker
Marital Status
Private
Do Some Lives Matter More Than Others?

That reminds me of a statistic I heard that over 1 million Iraqis died during the US war with Iraq compared to only 5,000 Americans. Imagine the outrage if American deaths were anywhere close to that amount. That implies many people consider American lives more important than Iraqi lives. Some drug trials are conducted in poor South American countries because the amount they have to pay if someone dies is much less which implies their lives aren't considered to be worth as much as American lives. In wrongful death lawsuits, a person's worth is calculated based on future income lost which implies high income and younger people's lives are considered to be worth more than low income and older people's lives. I'm not saying any of that is Christian, only that is how some people would answer the question.

I think there's a sense in which some lives are worth more in the sense they contribute more to society but another sense where all lives are equal in that everyone is created in the image of God.
 
Upvote 0

Gregory Thompson

Change is inevitable, feel free to spare some.
Site Supporter
Dec 20, 2009
30,531
8,671
Canada
✟924,305.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Christian Seeker
Marital Status
Married
Did Isaac Newton matter more than Hitler? Could we not attribute more value to mankind to Newton than Hitler?

Did William Shakespeare matter more than Justin Bieber ever will? Socrates more than Snoop Dog? Abraham Lincoln more than Al Sharpton?

Is it true that some lives matter more than others? Would you trade the life Jonas Salk (cured polio) for that of Kim Kardashian?

How about serial killers like Ted Bundy? Does your life matter more than his?

Do Some Lives Matter More Than Others?

I think the point of Black Lives Matter is because Black Lives are treated like they don't matter. People who are treated as less than people need advocacy. In the kingdom we are all considered equal under God, and as ambassadors of that kingdom, we should emulate this equality to everyone.
 
  • Like
Reactions: expos4ever
Upvote 0

sparow

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Oct 7, 2014
2,737
452
86
✟570,419.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
Its just different languages. There's nothing wrong with saying Christian.

I don't remember the context in which I made the statement you respond to or how it relates to the topic however the word Christian as a jargon or key word is used to refer to the true church as well as the false Church; in normal English the user determines what the word means; a dictionary gives the most common usage and as a function of dictionary definition a dictionary omits the least common usages which are still valid.
 
Upvote 0

NadineWoods

Newbie
Mar 22, 2011
20
8
NC
✟24,411.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Ok well posting all those quotes out of context in the old testament Doesn't impress. We are no longer under old testament
See post #205
"You have heard the law that says, ‘Love your neighbor and hate your enemy. But I say, love your enemies! Pray for those who persecute you! In that way, you will be acting as true children of your Father in heaven. For he gives his sunlight to both the evil and the good, and he sends rain on the just and the unjust alike. If you love only those who love you, what reward is there for that? Even corrupt tax collectors do that much. If you are kind only to your friends, how are you different from anyone else? Even pagans do that. But you are to be perfect, even as your Father in heaven is perfect." (Matthew 5:43-48)

There is a law change from the old testament to the new testament. ....

I apologize for the delay in responding. Life got in the way. It’s going to take a few posts for me to attempt to adequately respond to all of this so I’m going to start with:

Why I Value the Old Testament.

First, I don’t even understand how you can accuse me of taking the Old Testament out of context. The proverbs are just that “proverbs:” words of wisdom probably much of which were taught to Solomon by his father David, but written to Solomon’s sons since Solomon had too many sons to personally teach himself. And as far as the words (the Psalms) of David, the man whom God chose to provide the lineage for His Christ, I offered so many verses not to impress, but to impart to you the truth that God cares about the needy & afflicted. David didn’t just say it once; he said it over and over again so not only must it be true, but it must have been important enough for David to reiterate!

Here's why I love the Old Testament:

1. It prepared mankind for the New Testament & the amazing gift of Christ. I never fully appreciated all the nuances of the New Testament covenant until I did much more reading in the Old Testament. It unfolds God’s character, His forbearance, His faithfulness in light of man’s unfaithfulness, and His love that is beyond comprehension.

It is in light of the sacrifice that Abraham was willing to make of Isaac, that we are given a glimpse, a foreshadowing, of the sacrifice God our Father is willing to make for us. It is through the ordinance of Passover, that we see the glimmer of a Lamb that will be sacrificed so that spiritual death can pass over us. The Holy Spirit continues to use the Old Testament to speak to me so I find it of upmost value.

2. The Old Testament is quoted over and over again by Christ & the writers of the New Testament. If it was good enough for Christ to quote, it’s good enough for me to continue to quote and value. Other than the parables much of what Christ spoke was either quoting the Old Testament Scripture or paraphrasing it. Consider how He said that the two greatest commandments were loving God with all our hearts and souls and minds and loving our neighbor as ourselves. In many ways this is just paraphrasing the ten commandments into two more simplified commands. (Romans 13:8-10)

I won’t overwhelm you with countless examples of Christ quoting the Old Testament for fear that you may think I am trying to impress, but if you have a study Bible, you will easily be able to see just how much “Scripture” from the Old Testament is quoted. And remember during the time of Christ the only Scripture available was the Old Testament.

Not only Jesus, but Paul and Peter both quoted the Old Testament extensively. Here’s just one simple example:

Proverbs 25:21 If your enemy is hungry, give him food to eat; And if he is thirsty, give him water to drink; 25:22 For you will heap burning coals on his head, And the LORD will reward you.

Romans 12:20 “BUT IF YOUR ENEMY IS HUNGRY, FEED HIM, AND IF HE IS THIRSTY, GIVE HIM A DRINK; FOR IN SO DOING YOU WILL HEAP BURNING COALS ON HIS HEAD.”


Yes, the Old Testament does admonish us to be kind to our enemies. Given David’s character and how he treated people, I am assuming that this probably came directly from him to his son Solomon, but this is just my personal opinion.

3 God’s word contains truth therefore I would be a fool to discard any of it! Yes the Old Testament contains some ritualistic laws that no longer apply to us, but the totality of God’s Word contains so much truth about everything, especially about God’s character which does not change, so it is just as relevant today as it was thousands of years ago. Please consider (Much is left out for convenience sake; practically this entire long chapter is about God’s Word.):

Psalms 119:140 Your word is very pure, Therefore Your servant loves it. 119:141 I am small and despised, Yet I do not forget Your precepts. 119:142 Your righteousness is an everlasting righteousness, And Your law is truth. 119:143 Trouble and anguish have come upon me, Yet Your commandments are my delight. 119:144 Your testimonies are righteous forever; Give me understanding that I may live. …. 119:151 You are near, O LORD, And all Your commandments are truth. 119:152 Of old I have known from Your testimonies That You have founded them forever. Resh. … 119:160 The sum of Your word is truth, And every one of Your righteous ordinances is everlasting. Shin. (NASB)

Matthew 4:4 But He answered and said, “It is written, ‘MAN SHALL NOT LIVE ON BREAD ALONE, BUT ON EVERY WORD THAT PROCEEDS OUT OF THE MOUTH OF GOD.’”

4 We are not to add or take away from God’s Word. If this is what the Word of God says about taking away from just one book, what will become of those who take away whole sections?

Revelation 22:18 I testify to everyone who hears the words of the prophecy of this book; if anyone adds to them, God will add to him the plagues which are written in this book; 22:19 and if anyone takes away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God will take away his part from the tree of life and from the holy city, which are written in this book.


5 The Word of God DOES NOT EXPIRE!!! This is both in the Old Testament & the New Testament!!!!

I Peter 1:24 For, “ALL FLESH IS LIKE GRASS, AND ALL ITS GLORY LIKE THE FLOWER OF GRASS. THE GRASS WITHERS, AND THE FLOWER FALLS OFF, 1:25 BUT THE WORD OF THE LORD ENDURES FOREVER. “ And this is the word which was preached to you.

And here is the quote in Isaiah:

Isaiah 40:6 A voice says, “Call out.” Then he answered, What shall I call out?” All flesh is grass, and all its loveliness is like the flower of the field. 40:7 The grass withers, the flower fades, When the breath of the LORD blows upon it; Surely the people are grass. 40:8 The grass withers, the flower fades, But the word of our God stands forever.

Just because we are not under the old law, it does not negate the value of the Old Testament. God gives us free will so it is your prerogative to negate it if you like, but you can’t come on a Christian forum and actually expect other people to agree with your position on this matter. Most of us value “all” the Word of God so I will continue to use Old Testament Scripture in any posts I make to this board.

I’ll address more of what you said in another post.
 
Upvote 0

NadineWoods

Newbie
Mar 22, 2011
20
8
NC
✟24,411.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Ok well posting all those quotes out of context in the old testament Doesn't impress. We are no longer under old testament
See post #205
"You have heard the law that says, ‘Love your neighbor and hate your enemy. But I say, love your enemies! Pray for those who persecute you! In that way, you will be acting as true children of your Father in heaven. For he gives his sunlight to both the evil and the good, and he sends rain on the just and the unjust alike. If you love only those who love you, what reward is there for that? Even corrupt tax collectors do that much. If you are kind only to your friends, how are you different from anyone else? Even pagans do that. But you are to be perfect, even as your Father in heaven is perfect." (Matthew 5:43-48)

There is a law change from the old testament to the new testament. After the cross we are no longer to do eye for an eye.

First, I apologize for the long delay in replying dougangel. I thought I had already established that we weren’t discussing an eye for an eye. We were discussing a sniper who had the ability to save an innocent child from the hand of a murderer. You can keep trying to twist those actions into revenge but this sniper didn’t have any previous interaction with this madman that would give him a reason to take revenge. The sniper also is not repaying evil for evil since no apparent evil has yet occured! What the sniper would be doing is preventing an innocent child from dying. Since this madman wasn’t the sniper’s personal enemy (although he was the enemy of the child), the verse you quoted about loving your enemy doesn’t apply.

The sniper was wise enough to discern that the child was unable to protect himself, and the murderer was prepared to kill the child. This was a prevention of murder not revenge or hate or an eye for an eye.

When Christ speaks of loving your enemies, He does not speak about allowing evil to overtake innocent children. He is talking about loving those who despise Christ in you. Each man has to stand before God and give account of his actions. Whether self-defense is appropriate for a Christian or not is a matter of conscience since the scripture does not say that we cannot protect ourselves.

The scripture does say that we are called to be fruit inspectors. This is New Testament scripture so hopefully these verses will be acceptable to you.

Matthew 7:16 “You will know them by their fruits. Grapes are not gathered from thorn bushes nor figs from thistles, are they? 17 “So every good tree bears good fruit, but the bad tree bears bad fruit. 7:18 “A good tree cannot produce bad fruit, nor can a bad tree produce good fruit.”

Matthew 12:33 “Either make the tree good and its fruit good, or make the tree bad and its fruit bad; for the tree is known by its fruit. 12:34 “You brood of vipers, how can you, being evil, speak what is good? For the mouth speaks out of that which fills the heart. 12:35 “The good man brings out of his good treasure what is good; and the evil man brings out of his evil treasure what is evil. 12:36 “But I tell you that every careless word that people speak, they shall give an accounting for it in the day of judgment. 12:37 “For by your words you will be justified, and by your words you will be condemned.”

Luke 6:45 “The good man out of the good treasure of his heart brings forth what is good; and the evil man out of the evil treasure brings forth what is evil; for his mouth speaks from that which fills his heart. 44 “For each tree is known by its own fruit. For men do not gather figs from thorns, nor do they pick grapes from a briar bush. 43 “For there is no good tree which produces bad fruit, nor, on the other hand, a bad tree which produces good fruit.

A man of discernment will be able to distinguish good from evil! It doesn’t seem like rocket science to me to discern that a man with a knife to the neck of a child is probably not going to bear good fruit. And it is also not rocket science to distinguish that someone who has broken into your home probably does not have godly intentions. If we are true believers, we have the fullness of the Spirit in us to help us discern difficult situations. So whether we decide to defend ourselves or not is between us and God, but make no mistake self-defense is not repaying evil for evil because no evil has yet occurred.

Evil forces good people to do things they would not otherwise do in order to maintain justice and the rights of the innocent!!!! In my opinion, the accountability for these acts will fall on the perpetrator and not on the defender. Had the man not held the knife to the child’s neck then the sniper would never have fired. Had the man not broken into the family’s home, then the father would never have harmed him. The responsibility for any harm that occurs should fall to the person who begins the chain of events that causes it and not to the person forced to protect the innocent.

We are called to be people who love justice just as God loves justice. We are called to be protectors of the innocent.

Isaiah 30:18 Therefore the LORD longs to be gracious to you, And therefore He waits on high to have compassion on you. For the LORD is a God of justice; How blessed are all those who long for Him.

Are you refusing to acknowledge that it is our duty as Christians to protect the innocent? Is that why you didn’t like theses verses? I've added a few more.

Proverbs 24:11 Deliver those who are being taken away to death, And those who are staggering to slaughter, Oh hold them back. 24:12 If you say, “See, we did not know this,” Does He not consider it who weighs the hearts? And does He not know it who keeps your soul? And will He not render to man according to his work?

Proverbs 31:8 Open your mouth for the mute, For the rights of all the unfortunate. 31:9 Open your mouth, judge righteously, And defend the rights of the afflicted and needy.

Psalms 41:1 How blessed is he who considers the helpless; The LORD will deliver him in a day of trouble. 41:2 The LORD will protect him and keep him alive, And he shall be called blessed upon the earth; And do not give him over to the desire of his enemies. 41:3 The LORD will sustain him upon his sickbed; In his illness, You restore him to health.

Here are a couple from the New Testament:

James 1:27 Pure and undefiled religion in the sight of our God and Father is this: to visit orphans and widows in their distress, and to keep oneself unstained by the world.

Titus 3:14 Our people must also learn to engage in good deeds to meet pressing needs, so that they will not be unfruitful.

I know you hold the Words of Christ in such high esteem, and one of the most important commands He gives us is to love our neighbor as ourselves. He further explains who our “neighbor” is in the story of the good Samaritan (Luke 10:25-37). So let me ask you which person is your neighbor in the scenario we were discussing, the madman trying to kill the child, the child or the sniper?

And how will you show love for your neighbor in this situation? Is it love for your neighbor to allow a child to die when you have it in your power to prevent it? What would the law of the Spirit guide you to do?

Also you forgot to answer my question from my original response so I’ll ask it again: What would you want the sniper to do if it was your neck with the knife to it?

I’m really looking forward to your answers to these questions. Again, I apologize for the delay in replying.
 
Upvote 0

dougangel

Regular
Site Supporter
May 7, 2012
1,423
238
New Zealand
✟130,556.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
First, I apologize for the long delay in replying dougangel. I thought I had already established that we weren’t discussing an eye for an eye. We were discussing a sniper who had the ability to save an innocent child from the hand of a murderer. You can keep trying to twist those actions into revenge but this sniper didn’t have any previous interaction with this madman that would give him a reason to take revenge. The sniper also is not repaying evil for evil since no apparent evil has yet occured! What the sniper would be doing is preventing an innocent child from dying. Since this madman wasn’t the sniper’s personal enemy (although he was the enemy of the child), the verse you quoted about loving your enemy doesn’t apply.

The sniper was wise enough to discern that the child was unable to protect himself, and the murderer was prepared to kill the child. This was a prevention of murder not revenge or hate or an eye for an eye.

When Christ speaks of loving your enemies, He does not speak about allowing evil to overtake innocent children. He is talking about loving those who despise Christ in you. Each man has to stand before God and give account of his actions. Whether self-defense is appropriate for a Christian or not is a matter of conscience since the scripture does not say that we cannot protect ourselves.

Ok well I've taken along time to answer this because I just find it ridiculous. I don't have a gun and I wouldn't train as a sniper. And I'm not going to be like Peter and answer a life and death situation like that before it happens. So I'm not going to answer that. You seem to be more worried about that girl than all the innocent civilians who die to collateral damage, homelessness, starvation, and preventable diseases or even corrupt soldiers. Jesus said woe to the people who cause evil. So those people have to give account to God.
The proliferation of arms by first world countries to 3rd world countries are causing a lot of the arm problems in the world. It all seems to be driven by the love of money being the root of all evil.

Jesus didn't get involved in wars. Although the Romans were doing terrible things in their captured countries. As priests of the New covenant Jesus says not to get involved in worldly things. This is a strong theme all through the gospels. When the church has got involved with the state in history. The fruits haven't been good. For example the crusades, the catholic inquisition.
Another way of explaining this is the World is going to do what it does. But Christians should act Christ like.
 
Upvote 0