SnowyMacie
Well-Known Member
- Apr 12, 2011
- 17,008
- 6,087
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Female
- Faith
- Anglican
- Marital Status
- In Relationship
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I am extremely grateful to have attended public schools from kindergarten through the 8th grade. I feel that I've benefitted hugely by being in a classroom every day for years with kids & teachers who came from families different from my own family. I think learning how to be a citizen is an important part of growing up, and going to school helps you to learn citizenship. It teaches you how to interact with other people. It expands your mind & socialization. You learn so much from your teachers but you learn so much from other kids too, like how to handle conflict. If my family hadn't moved out of America, I would have kept going to public schools. The biggest crush when I found out we were moving was that I wouldn't be attending the HS in Seattle I was set to go to, because it's got an excellent reputation. It's where all my friends went & were happy. I would have been able to earn dual enrollment credit through UW. They have amazing music & athletic programs.
I now go to an online school run by a really great college. I just finished the 10th grade. I made a perfect 5 on my AP exams, so I'll be able to earn college credit from them. My parents are very smart, but I don't think they could have taught me so many different advanced classes anywhere near as well as my teachers. The OHS has the advantages of homeschooling like flexibility to travel, but each of my teachers has a Masters degree or higher in his or her subject. My teachers grade my work, not my parents. I'm not living in a cocoon. I'm in a classroom every day with kids from around the world. We have meet-ups several times a year. Neil DeGrasse Tyson came to one of them! We still have homecoming, prom, education.
I got started in music back in kindergarten at my public school. The music teacher there taught me how to play the piano. She told my parents that I had promise in music. Starting in the 1st grade, I went to an on campus after-school program where I had piano lessons. I just finished the highest level possible for piano certification at the Royal Conservatory of Music. There are kids who've homeschooled just to have more time with music, but it's taken them longer. I think having excellent teachers helped me to move up more quickly. I was in the middle school orchestra & that lead to me being in the city's youth orchestra. Since I have my certification, I was able to get a job with a music center. I'm going to be making a nice salary for only being 16. My older sister also got into music at public schools. She started at the same time I did, but became really fantastic really fast. She has Asperger's & had some difficulty being at school sometimes, but the good definitely outweighed the bad. Going to school helped her to learn really important social cues. It helps her not just with school, but with life. She got a full merit scholarship to the University of Chicago. It's one of the best universities in the world & it's crazy expensive. $71,000 a year, & she got a four year scholarship. That's how much they wanted her. So I think her public school education served her extremely well in life! I am hoping to get a scholarship there, too.
It really depends on the children. If they are advanced then they get a much better education in public schools. There is just no comparison, they can graduate from High School with a 2 year college degree all paid for by the High school. If you afford a high priced private school some students can get a better education there then in public schools. I do not think there is a one size fits all because everyone has different needs. In some cases there are people that feel they are better off home schooling.
In some cases that is more important then the education. I see people that have Medical Degrees or PhD's that are a flat line when it comes to social skills. They would have been much better to concentrate on developing those skills before they got their higher education.
Government schools are find for students that are smart enough to see where they Gov is trying to brain wash them and they laugh it off and don't allow the propaganda to effect them. If they are not smart enough to figure that out then indoctrinate them into a system that agrees with your values.
My son took a 3D printer class at the high school. Where is a home school student going to get the opportunity to take that class? Also he was taking classes at the university and the high school was paying for it. It would be nice IF Trump would offer this to home school students, but it remains to be seen if the taxpayers are going to extend this to the nonpublic school students. It is possible for a High School student to graduate from High School with a two year college degree. If they start early and work hard. Also my son got a $25,000 scholarship and I know of public school students that can get up to a $60,000 scholarships based on how hard they worked in High School and how much they took advantage of the advanced classes.That is the most frequently touted reason for preferring a public school, and it's also the worst reason. First, parents who homeschool are rarely hermits. Their kids usually do get out to youth activities that are better social environments than public schools.
Wonderful.My son took a 3D printer class at the high school.
Unless the parents are rich it's not going to happen. It's unfair, don't you think, that taxpayer money goes to some students, the ones in public schools, but is not allowed for any other students?Where is a home school student going to get the opportunity to take that class?
Wonderful again.Also he was taking classes at the university and the high school was paying for it.
Why should taxpayers be funding public schools exclusively and not all students? I mean aren't parents who home school or have students in private schools also taxpayers? Why can't their students benefit as well?It would be nice IF Trump would offer this to home school students, but it remains to be seen if the taxpayers are going to extend this to the nonpublic school students.
Well my children were not homeschooled but attended Catholic schools and they did exceptionally well in college, They were better prepared for college than many of their public schooled peers, and they got scholarships from their colleges.It is possible for a High School student to graduate from High School with a two year college degree. If they start early and work hard. Also my son got a $25,000 scholarship and I know of public school students that can get up to a $60,000 scholarships based on how hard they worked in High School and how much they took advantage of the advanced classes.
Logically--and legally--if Catholic (and Lutheran and Muslim, etc.) schools were required to admit all applicants regardless of religion and not teach religious studies to any of them (which would be unconstititional), there might be an argument for public financing of all schools equally.We once had rational local funding for students, but the WASPs had to figure out how to exclude Catholic students in Catholic schools from any of this. It should be, and should have always been, that students got public support, not just some students. It's a matter of equity.
It's not actually a question of public support for all schools. It's about public support of all students. Only some students get public support now. And the public support they get often means inadequate education anyhow. Given the choice, which for a short time was possible in the District of Columbia before Obama quashed it, poor and middle class students could get assistance to opt out of the government schools. All sorts of students and their parents jumped at the chance to be able to afford a non-government school.Logically--and legally--if Catholic (and Lutheran and Muslim, etc.) schools were required to admit all applicants regardless of religion and not teach religious studies to any of them (which would be unconstititional), there might be an argument for public financing of all schools equally.
My son took a 3D printer class at the high school. Where is a home school student going to get the opportunity to take that class?
Also he was taking classes at the university and the high school was paying for it. It would be nice IF Trump would offer this to home school students, but it remains to be seen if the taxpayers are going to extend this to the nonpublic school students. It is possible for a High School student to graduate from High School with a two year college degree. If they start early and work hard. Also my son got a $25,000 scholarship and I know of public school students that can get up to a $60,000 scholarships based on how hard they worked in High School and how much they took advantage of the advanced classes.
Thank you for the recommendation. I'll try to find it. I don't know if the 'grass is greener' elsewhere. Just that it's not very green here unless you live in the right suburb for a relatively good government school, or else you're rich enough to pay private school tuition out of pocket change. For the rest of us it is scrimp and borrow and beg to afford the government school taxes AND a Catholic school education. I'm not talking an elite snobby expensive Catholic school either, but an inner city one that took in all comers.It might be worth noting that in Australia, the government does fund non-state schools on a per-student basis (provided those schools meet certain minimum criteria with regard to curriculum etc), including religious schools. While I do think this reflects a degree of justice, doing it this way is also not without problems. If you're interested to see whether the grass is really greener, it might be worth doing some reading about the Gonski review (and the government's abject failure to implement its recommendations).
All my son did was apply to the university and when he got his acceptance letter they informed him that he would receive $24,000 in merit scholarships. He would have gotten more but I got some bad advise from my brother that cost us around $15,000 in scholarships.Are you implying that all public schools have 3d printers? I assure you: They do not. If not, what is your point...more individuals have 3D printers than do public schools.
We are planning for my daughter's children to be homeschooled by us. They will learn how to build computers, how to program computers, how to install residential plumbing, how to speak Latin and Spanish, how to install residential electrical, how to bake a cake from scratch, how to garden, how to raise livestock, how to conjugate verbs, how to photograph a portrait, how to paint a portrait, how to write a sonnet, how to diagram sentences, how to prove a theorem, how to overhaul an automobile engine, how to understand Aristotle, how to write an instruction manual, and many other things public schools do not touch.
They'll also interact with other youth at church, in Scouts, and with the children of friends and family.
There are plenty of scholarship programs around. I know of a young woman who made a part-time job out of going thorough the yellow pages and sending a scholarship request package to each business. Put herself completely through college that way and got an immediate job writing grant request packages for non-profits.
I am not a big fan of home schooling but you have to do what you feel is best and right for you. No doubt we are to be sanctified and separate from the world. Of course that is going to be a lot easier if you never leave the house and get out into the real world.
If you are capable of teaching them yourself that is fine. The people that I know that home schools gives them a computer program that takes about two hours a day and that is it.
They develop very little if any social skills and I question if they learn how to function in the real world. A lot of times they end up home schooled because they are bullied and can not learn how to get along with people.
The school system takes the money and gives it to the advanced students that work the hardest. They invest in the student that is going to be a doctor, engineer or contribute more then the students destine to work at McDonald and do not want to work or take advantage of the opportunities that are available for them.It's unfair, don't you think, that taxpayer money goes to some students, the ones in public schools, but is not allowed for any other students?
One possible drawback to public funding of all students could be that the government could use that to get it's tentacles into homeschool and private school curriculum. It's one thing to have some minimal standards. It's another to mandate education with something like Common Core. That was a flop that even public school teachers grew to hate.
That is the most frequently touted reason for preferring a public school, and it's also the worst reason. First, parents who home school are rarely hermits. Their kids usually do get out to youth activities that are better social environments than public schools.
The youth culture of most public schools (particularly middle and high schools) operates at a level of social brutality just above prison culture...and for the same reasons. The "social skills" kids learn in school must be "unlearned" in order for them to operate in adult society. In the 90s the US Marine Corps added an entire week to their basic training just to spend more time "untraining" kids from what they thought were real life moral values that they learned in high school.
The school system takes the money and gives it to the advanced students that work the hardest. They invest in the student that is going to be a doctor, engineer or contribute more then the students destine to work at McDonald and do not want to work or take advantage of the opportunities that are available for them.
I'm sure that some high schools operate at the "social brutality above prison culture" but gracious knows that's not the way all do!!!!
Every school in this area does it. My son attended three different universities while he was in High School. He took the more basic classes but they went beyond what he could receive from the High School. Also he was not allowed to attend any social clubs at the university. AT the time he was happy to socialize with the High School Students.A few higher-end public schools do that. A very few. And that--as you acknowledge--only for their advanced students, who are only a few of the very few.
Actually, they all do. Every single one. In most we're talking about something equivalent to "minimum security prisons," but all high schools are a mirror of prison culture--and for exactly the same reasons. Society sets up the same environmental factors for high schools as for prisons. Even modern high school buildings themselves often use prison architectural designs...for the same reasons.
So you have the same cultural development features in both...which have to be unlearned for the person to operate when he's finally released into the "real world." "Mean Girls" is the same culture as "Orange is the New Black."
We are planning for my daughter's children to be homeschooled by us. They will learn how to build computers, how to program computers, how to install residential plumbing, how to speak Latin and Spanish, how to install residential electrical, how to bake a cake from scratch, how to garden, how to raise livestock, how to conjugate verbs, how to photograph a portrait, how to paint a portrait, how to write a sonnet, how to diagram sentences, how to prove a theorem, how to overhaul an automobile engine, how to understand Aristotle, how to write an instruction manual, and many other things public schools do not touch.
They'll also interact with other youth at church, in Scouts, and with the children of friends and family.