2000 Mules

[DaisyDay]

I guess you're not familiar with sarcasm???

For sarcasm to work, it has to be apt.

 

[inquiring mind]

For sarcasm to work, it has to be apt.

Are you being sarcastic?

 

[DaisyDay]

Are you being sarcastic?

Not in the least.

 

[KCfromNC]

You're not equating the Covid adjusted mail-in voting ballots of 2020 to regular absentee ballots are you?

I don't know there's any significant difference. Seemed to work well enough.

 

[KCfromNC]

I'm talking about the potential for it... Are you not for doing all we can to insure the integrity of the vote?

Best way to prevent any possibility of voter fraud is to do away with elections. Are you not for doing all we can to insure the integrity of the vote?

If there were actually an issue, rather than some asserted random potential, maybe these concerns would be taken more seriously.

 

[timothyu]

Step away from the issue folks. There's nothing to see here

 

[Paulos23]

I'm not sure. I just watched it once and you know how that is, plus it was a few days ago. Watch it if you can, even if you don't agree, it's entertaining. My take, as I said earlier, is the potential for abuse, detected or not.

The potential for abuse does not mean it happened.

And I have watched a conservitive review of it, and they point out that they did not show one person going to multiple boxes which they should be able to do with many hours of CTV videos they got. But they don't.

They need to give out the data they have and show that there is at least one mule.

The review is 20 minutes.

 

[timothyu]

They need to give out the data they have and show that there is at least one mule.

Perhaps we should wait and see what the FBI says about the info given them. That might give these folks enough time to recoup the cost of the vid.

 

[Paulos23]

Perhaps we should wait and see what the FBI says about the info given them. That might give these folks enough time to recoup the cost of the vid.

Given that this was behind a paywall, I think they have gotten enough money.

 

[timothyu]

Given that this was behind a paywall, I think they have gotten enough money.

Well regardless, the FBI will have the final say. X-files may need be re-opened

 

[Deviant Writer]

Best way to prevent any possibility of voter fraud is to do away with elections. Are you not for doing all we can to insure the integrity of the vote?

Even better would be building a Death Star to destroy the planet. Then having the Death Star self-destruct, so the human race goes extinct. No humans=no fraud. Why are people not for doing all they can to insure (sic) the integrity of the vote?!

 

[Mark Quayle]

The potential for abuse does not mean it happened.

And I have watched a conservitive review of it, and they point out that they did not show one person going to multiple boxes which they should be able to do with many hours of CTV videos they got. But they don't.

They need to give out the data they have and show that there is at least one mule.

The review is 20 minutes.


For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring. -- Carl Sagan

Skeptical scrutiny is the means, in both science and religion, by which deep thoughts can be winnowed from deep nonsense. -- Carl Sagan

Notice your two quotes from Sagan can also contradict each other as principles by which to live and think; who of us is capable of grasping the Universe as it really is? We know very little. Healthy skepticism of our own "grasp of the Universe as it really is", is also important.

 

[timothyu]

For what it is worth in this game.. an update on criticism

 

[Paulos23]

Notice your two quotes from Sagan can also contradict each other as principles by which to live and think; who of us is capable of grasping the Universe as it really is? We know very little. Healthy skepticism of our own "grasp of the Universe as it really is", is also important.

A: that is my signature and not part of the post you quoted

B: They are not that different in trying to figure out reality.

 

[Mark Quayle]

A: that is my signature and not part of the post you quoted

B: They are not that different in trying to figure out reality.

A) They are in your signature, and thus, included in what got posted, though you did not mean them to be part of the argument of your post. But the point is moot.
B) They work nicely together in figuring out reality, if, as Sagan seems to think, he has a clear view of reality. But none of understands even what little we see of the whole picture. Skepticism of self is a good policy.