Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Well, one would have to read my posts to find them.In your description there is no repentance, conviction of sin and righteous walking, love, confession, testimony.
I don't use assumptions, as you do, or use big words, as you do.So I doubt your assumptions and big words.
No, it isn't, but again, one would have to read my posts to find that.The cross is significant, and again dying with Christ to the world is missing.
Again, one would have to read my posts find them.You have believing without involvement. But to me that is not belief, it is a formula.
This is why it's just not possible to have a rational or reasonable discussion with you. You haven't been reading what I post. I guess, you're just too eager to continue your one-way diatribe, rather than actually engaging what I say.Sin. You appear to believe it is always present, so no making us Holy, pure or cleansed.
There is no point. And what's the point of trying to have a discussion with you when you won't read anything that I post?So what is the point if the power of Christ is to appear as a saint but not be one?
Well, one would have to read my posts to find them.
I don't use assumptions, as you do, or use big words, as you do.
I quote Scripture that parallels what I believe.
No, it isn't, but again, one would have to read my posts to find that.
Again, one would have to read my posts find them.
Regarding involvement, who has repeatedly explained being filled with the Spirit (Eph 5:18), walking with the Spirit (Gal 5:16), and the commands to STOP grieving (Eph 4:30) and quenching (1 Thess 5:19) the Spirit, other than Gr8Grace and I.
It's you who have shown your total unfamiliarity with these commands.
This is why it's just not possible to have a rational or reasonable discussion with you. You haven't been reading what I post. I guess, you're just too eager to continue your one-way diatribe, rather than actually engaging what I say.
The ONLY way to be holy, pure and cleansed is by confession of sin, something you haven't ever commented on. But just read 1 John 1:9. It's all there.
There is no point. And what's the point of trying to have a discussion with you when you won't read anything that I post?
You haven't ever explained how one fulfills the command to be filled with the Spirit. Even after being asked to explain it. So I have to conclude that you just don't know how.
So you hide your ignorance of spiritual living behind your flowery, feel-good, and emotional words.
I have been disagreeing with your view that a saved sealed person can perish.I am not sure what you mean. If you agree with me that dying with Christ and living in the Spirit, walking in His ways is the road to life, which is a simple summary of our walk, why do you behave like you disagree with me?
You are confusing being indwelt with being filled. And after all the questions from Gr8Grace and me on this subject, you've never responded.It is an odd question for me, to ask how to be filled with the Spirit, because walking in the ways of the Spirit, praise and prayer fills us with the Spirit. We receive the Spirit on coming to faith in Christ with repentance.
Of course it is.And you are saying we can be Holy, through confession of our sins, and purfication by the blood of our consciences. This is a big difference I have found with many. They do not see righteous walking as confirmation of the Holy Spirit within.
I find your words "hyper grace" to be troubling. Those who insist that holy living is ultimately the way to heaven just seem to hate the notion that God will let in any of His rebellious children.What is confusing is your positions appears similar to hyper grace believers, except you are taking a more tradional line with security or calvanistic views. The hyper grace believers go for all sin is forgiven for the whole world, and judgement is only on faith in Christ.
Why don't you believe this? Haven't you read the Bible? Haven't you heard of being "born again", the "new birth", "regeneration"? These words have a specific meaning.They also have a view of a pure holy born again spirit dwelling in sinful flesh, which is similar to gnostic views.
No, I have NEVER aligned myself with such nonsense. You're the one who keeps trying to align me with idiots. And I've repeatedly refuted your attempts.So aligning yourself with such believers maybe distorts what you actually do believe.
I quote Scripture to show what I believe.Just quoting scripture does not show up these differences.
Don't align me with that "one guy".Rejection of the sermon on the mount and its relevance to the christian walk is often a clear difference. If you agree with me that all the sermon on the mount applies to all believers, then Amen. One guy showed how their view was this was a sarcastic discussion by Jesus to show the level of our failure, rather than the path to new life in Him.
Don't align me with them.I hope you can see this is very foundational. They would deny all scripture before the cross and they are in a new dispensation of grace, starting after pentecost.
Where did Jonah feel grief? He was fairly hard hearted and headed.Their language of repentance is just a change of mind, is built on to deny Jonah or feel grief for sin.
OK, explain exactly what this "easy believism" is and means.As I have stated before this leads to easy believism, which has lead many similar to myself to comment on forums and stand as a witness to their errors.
I think you need to go back and review my replies to your posts. That's what I and Gr8Grace have been trying to get through to you about.One discussion was repentance was like saying I do not like oranges now, only apples.
To me this is just insane. But maybe you have a fuller view than this. I am all ears.
My view is now based on two principles.Why don't you believe this? Haven't you read the Bible? Haven't you heard of being "born again", the "new birth", "regeneration"? These words have a specific meaning.
It's not "mystic". It's real. Paul mentions "body, soul, and spirit", of believers. Unbelievers, being spiritually dead, have only a body and soul. But at the moment of rebirth, what is RE-born is the dead human spirit.
This question suggests that doctrines don't effect your life. Which I believe, since you have been clear about living your life from emotions and feelings, rather than reality of objectivity.My view is now based on two principles.
Does a belief or doctrine affect my life, one way or the other?
Yet, the Bible does. And very clearly.If the answer is no, for instance do we have a spirit, or just a soul?
The principles of the way and our communion do not changed dependant on my understanding or otherwise.
I do not believe you can separate the body from the spirit.
Are you kidding? He said those who are in Christ are NEW CREATURES/CREATION.When Paul says we go from death to life, he appears to be talking about us becoming alive in Christ rather than something new being given to us.
I never once mentioned anything "external" in my post. So why do you put this in?There is no evidence that something external becomes us at spiritual birth.
The Bible clearly shows that a very dead spirit is born AGAIN, given a NEW birth, and is RE-generated. But these objective words seem to have no meaning or significance to you.Rather life is given to the believer, something that was not there now exists and breaths.
Physical life, sure. Not eternal life, which is a gift given at the moment of faith in Christ.But equally it appears this life can also die.
You didn't say one single thing to refute my explanation of what "rebirth", "new birth", and "regeneration" means. You merely ignored it.What demonstrates the problem with sinful man is his ability to try and get away with whatever they can.
Paul did. And we can try to clean up our body(flesh) to the best of our ability, But if we are not in fellowship with Him through our new creation(regenerated human Spirit/that CANNOT sin) it is all for NAUGHT.I do not believe you can separate the body from the spirit.
Eph 4:24~~New American Standard BibleWhen Paul says we go from death to life, he appears to be talking about us becoming alive in Christ rather than something new being given to us.
What demonstrates the problem with sinful man is his ability to try and get away with whatever they can.
I said:
"I just ANSWERED your bogus question, for the umpteenth time."
Seriously? Aren't you even trying to follow this discussion? Or just rather keep on repeating your very tired talking points?
It was a RESOUNDING YES.
A RESOUNDING YES.
False alert!!! Eph 1:13,14 guarantees an inheritance for the sealed believer, for the day of redemption.
note that the key word is "redemption", not "judgment".
You are the one who is not functioning in reality.
v.27 is a clear description of WHAT Jesus' sheep DO. There are NO conditions for anything in v.27.
v.28 is a clear statement of the CAUSE and EFFECT of possessing (having) eternal life.
"I give them eternal life, and they shall never perish."
The red words state the CAUSE of having eternal life, which is Jesus Christ Himself.
The blue words state the EFFECT of having eternal life, which is to never perish.
I've given this to you many, many times. And you've repeatedly failed to even address my points, that I color coded for ease of understanding my points.
A person would have to be either color blind or stupid to not follow my points.
So, if you decide, once again, to ignore my points, then at least let the forum know which you are: color blind or stupid
This question suggests that doctrines don't effect your life. Which I believe, since you have been clear about living your life from emotions and feelings, rather than reality of objectivity.
You're just real funny.Thank you for proving your “theology” is unbiblical.
Absolutely.Those who are in Christ have eternal life.
And this is EVERYONE who has NEVER believed in Christ.Those who are not in Christ do not have eternal life.
Refers to believers, who are sealed IN Christ (have the Son) and unbelievers, who are NOT sealed IN Christ and will perish.He who has the Son has life; he who does not have the Son of God does not have life. 1 John 5:12
All I can explain is the stupidity of claiming that given Eph 1:13,14, 4:30, 2 Cor 1:22 and 5:5, that anyone who has believed, can be unsealed. Now, that is stupidity.Please explain to everyone what the difference is between an unbeliever who is not in Christ and a believer who is not in Christ?
What is quite laughable is the calim that there was "no scripture" in my post.LOL.
There is no scripture in your post.
I cited the verse and explained WHY there is no need to quote it. Those who are intellectually honest can look up the verse and realize that my comment about v.27 is correct. It is a description of Jesus' sheep. It contains NO WORDS that even suggest being a condition for never perishing. That is simply foolish thinking.You never bothered to quote verse 27.
See above. Which I've previously explained over and over.Why?
I agree. That's why I cite or quote so much Scripture that ACTUALLY SAYS WHAT I BELIEVE. Unlike yourself.No one is interested in your opinion.
Again, you seem to relish lying. I quoted v.28 in my post, and even color coded it for ease in following my points.The reason you never use scripture, but instead you post your “explanation” of the verse and tag your opinion with a scripture reference.
My pleasure. From John 10. I hope I've included enough context. lolPost a scripture with the context so we can all see what the Lord actually said.
Unless you can and will explain how I have a different "version" of v.28 than what the Bible says, your statement is beyond absurd.Not your version of what He said.
I don't know where you get your definitions from, but your claim is not correct.Doctrines are a word that describes the ideas of a theology. They are not the living the theology, just its description.
No it's not. That's just ridiculous.It is like saying I believe in love, yet not loving, or Christ is God yet not obeying Him, or my sin is forgiven yet continue deliberately sinning.
Except believing all this is folly, for the Bible teaches that all are sinners, that all have fallen short of God's glory, that there is none good, no, not one. You want the verses? OK: Rom 3:9, 23, 11.So if one believes on being born again, we become pure and holy and cannot sin, it has to be reflected in ones life.
Wrong again. The struggles reveal lack of faith, not that the principles are not "clear cut".If the reality is struggles, failure with confession and repentance, then one has to admit, maybe things are not so clear cut.
Huh? How has this "theology" grown? What do you mean?So has grown the theology of transformation, of open hearts, of rebuilding how we are and how we behave.
Explain the commands that result in fruit bearing.This is not a self restructuring but one of applying the commands and the fruit taking root.
No, spiritual growth is NEVER called "behavioralism". That is just more psycho-babble. Spiritual growth is growing in your salvation (1 Pet 2:2).This is called behaviouralism, were the actual change is not analytical, but through putting love in action, not because it says obey, but because one begins to see what to love and what to shun.
I don't know where you get your definitions from, but your claim is not correct.
A doctrine is a teaching or principle from the Word of God.
No it's not. That's just ridiculous.
Wrong again. The struggles reveal lack of faith, not that the principles are not "clear cut".
Correct. Man will justify all his bad with all his 'good'.........that is why we see the GWTJ judging people according to their DEEDS(human good) rather than their sins.(Jesus paid for ALL sin)
This is what I said: "A doctrine is a teaching or principle from the Word of God."Here is a problem. A doctrine is part of a belief system.
And that is the problem. You keep wanting to wander all over the place, while I am trying to stay ON TRACK with the Bible. I don't care a bit about false doctrines of any kind.It may or may not be from God or even in the bible. I am defining objective definition of belief systems.
There you go again, hiding behind all those "others". Does that give you some kind of comfort, or something?I suspect you just enjoy being provocative. I have heard of people whose aim is just to provoke.
I don't understand your sentence. Hypocrisy IS saying one thing and doing another. So how is that definition "ridiculous about hypocrisy"? That doesn't make sense.What is ridiculous about hypocrisy and saying one thing and doing another?
Just what it says. Believers are to be as a light on a hill, with our good works shining so they are seen by others, as a witness of our faith.When Jesus says we are light on a hill, that good works done through and by His power are this light, what does that mean to you?
I fail to see any point here. Oh, are you thinking about all those "others" you keep bringing up?As I said, we are called to be the people of light.
If one is full of darkness, one is not obviously a person of the light.
I wouldn't use the word "simple" in regard to your sentences. Many of them just don't make any sense. Which I always point out, and you never re-phrase to clarify whatever it was you intended to communicate.It seems this simple language is too much for you. How is this, unless you are deliberately avoiding it?
OK, I'll repeat myself: "The struggles reveal lack of faith, not that the principles are not "clear cut"."Struggles in our walk are because of lack of faith, not a lack of resolution?
All your "applications" here are totally phony.No surprise then things seem so hard, if you think faith bring you victory.
I have this disease but if I have faith it will go away.
I am addicted to ...... but if I have faith it will go away.
I hate my ....... but if I have faith it will be no more.
I stole ...... but if I have faith I am not guilty
Of course. God will provide for me. But I have to follow His guidance.Faith is trust in God, but one actually has to do what He tells you to do to resolve the issue.
If you think this sentence is clear or has meaning, I disagree. Please re-phrase as to make sense. Thanks in advance.The old story of calling to God for rescue, and all the people are rejected because they are not God, though all provided rescue.
Oh yeah. All those "others" that you love to obsess over.And church history demonstrates nothing is "clear cut".
From all your examples, it seems you prefer to focus on the "plain nuts".Ask people in a congregation who is Jesus and you will get a different response from each one, some will be plain nuts while others full of the Holy Spirit.
Well, you'd just be wrong again in all your imagining. The VERY REASON I keep posting to you is to try to get you to see what the Bible says, instead of all your emotin' and feelin'.All I can imagine is you do not listen much to others, and are too involved in your own belief system and not helping others discover who God is and what His will actually is.
Why do you think I'm diseased and broken, and in need ot being healed and made whole?I pray the Lord might open your heart to Him and His will, and He might help you to feel and be free, to be healed and made whole, to stop defending and just be in Him and through Him and by Him, Amen.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?