Maybe instead of math they are being taught what is really important.
uwm.edu
With regards to the lacking educational attainment in poverty districts, that's an issue that predates the kind of thing you're referring to.
With or without pronoun initiatives, they'd be having this problem.
As far as the DEI stuff is concerned, based on the original article as well as Baltimore's policies implemented in 2019, the "D" and the "I" don't seem to be the issue, it's the "E"
The Baltimore City Schools released the following presser in 2019 (pre-pandemic)
Together with a taskforce of community leaders and partners, City Schools has developed an equity policy that was presented to the Board of School Commissioners' Policy Committee on March 19, 2019. It was adopted on June 11, 2019.
When you read the policy, it states the following as one of its bullet points:
City Schools staff will analyze and eliminate policies and practices employed by the district that result in the predictability of inequities
They go on to list the following as things as "predictors of inequity"
- Use of assessments
- Over representation of certain groups in special education
- Under representation of certain groups in advanced academics
- Disproportionality in suspension
So it sounds like it was a combination of bad policies being implemented (that eliminated testing, neglects to address behavioral problems, and was overly-focused on making both special ed and advanced programs "perfectly blended melting pots" rather than what the stated pragmatic purpose is supposed to be for such programs)
...and then a few months later, everyone getting sent home for remote learning...which certainly didn't help matters either.
It's basically the perfect storm for kids who are already behind to fall even further behind.
"There's too many kids of demographic XYZ in special ed, that looks pretty bad on the surface, so let's change the standards so that the end result is a nice even mix of all demographics" might be superficially well-intentioned, but it's certainly not doing any favors for a student who is legitimately struggling in certain subjects, and who is being kept in the regular class to artificially keep things "even steven".
The same is true for the other end of the spectrum. If you're artificially taking certain kids who are average C+/B- minus students in Math, and shoehorning them into the Advanced Trig class in order to keep up appearances, they're not being done any favors either by being tossed in the deep end with material that's way over their head.
Something similar happened with my one younger brother. (it wasn't the school pushing for him to take AP courses, it was my mom because she wanted him to get the GPA boost by taking an advanced class or two). He barely met the requirements, it backfired as he ended up going from getting decent grades in the regular classes, to D's in the AP ones... he would've been better off (GPA wise) with sticking with the better grades in the regular courses.