The pardons were issued.
That’s “my evidence”; the Constitution says the President has pardon power, it says nothing about “signing”.
That wasn't the question. We know pardons were issued. That was reported widely and with visible evidence.
What we do not know is whether Biden was
aware of what was happening and being done in his name. We all know that he was impaired the past couple of years; the evidence was obvious, though the coverup continued until after he left office when even the complicit started mentioning questions and observances they had had, but the agenda was too important to question publicly.
From the left-leaning The Hill:
"Senate Democratic Leader
Chuck Schumer (N.Y.),
who in February dismissed talk about a decline in Biden’s mental and physical fitness as “right-wing propaganda,” was challenged over the weekend by NBC’s Kristen Welker.
Welker put the question bluntly to Schumer by asking
whether he “and other top Democrats misled” Americans about Biden’s “mental acuity.”
“Look, we didn’t,” Schumer answered tersely, before defending Biden’s record and character.
“The legislation we passed, one of the most significant groups of legislation since Lyndon Johnson’s Great Society,” Schumer said, referring to Biden’s Inflation Reduction Act, which included a host of energy and climate provisions.
“Putting in 235 judges [on the federal bench], a record. And he’s a patriot, he’s a great guy,” Schumer added. (A bunch of other complicit Senators are quoted as well).
A handful of Democratic senators are now warning there will be more calls for answers and accountability given that Biden’s condition became a glaring problem after he muddled through the first presidential debate against Donald Trump in June."
The Democrats knew something was wrong:
"The Democrat said members of Biden’s inner team need to be scrutinized about what actions they took to “insulate him from the concerns” fellow Democrats harbored about his ability to win and fully serve a second term.
After Biden’s embarrassing performance at the debate, only a few Democratic senators thought he should remain the nominee.
"A second Democratic senator acknowledged Monday that m
any Senate colleagues had serious concerns about Biden’s energy, stamina and acuity well before the June 27 debate in Atlanta but didn’t want to undermine someone they saw as their likely nominee for president.
“You don’t undermine your nominee,” said the Democratic senator, explaining why there weren’t louder public calls from Democrats on Capitol Hill for Biden to drop out of the race sooner."
