I'm working on an argument which seems promising to me, but I lack the necessary background. If someone with knowledge of genetics could read over what I've got, it'd be much appreciated :) Just post here or PM me, and I'll send you the material.
Someone in another thread linked to this site, which purports to refute Mark Isaac's ICC. Needless to say, the responses are the usual drivel; but some in particular leap out as even more hideously wrong than the average creationist argument. Take a look at this one; in which one intrepid...
Taking their lead from the success of the ID movement, the reDiscovery Institute is doing for chemistry what their ID counterparts have done for biology:
I think we need to get Mechanical Bliss in touch with these guys.
Relayed from Monica Simmons of The Mars Society
Donald Savage
Headquarters, Washington March 1, 2004
(Phone: 202/358-1547)
Guy Webster
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif.
(Phone: 818/354-5011)
NOTE TO EDITORS: N04-038
NASA HEADQUARTERS MARS-ROVER OPPORTUNITY PRESS...
Specifically, the Wilberforce Award, dedicated to opponents of evolution who "through the silly nature of their arguments or actions, have inadvertently done the most to promote evolution as a fact". Congratulations, Carl! Keep up the good work!