• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

RFK Jr’s ‘Maha’ report found to contain citations to nonexistent studies

durangodawood

re Member
Aug 28, 2007
28,977
20,531
Colorado
✟578,872.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Single
When you consider the data mentioned, blanket preemptive dismissal would make actually make some sense.

Once the seed has been planted, you can't put the genie back into the bottle so to speak. (Hence the reason why people who go to those practitioners are 25-25% less likely to get vaccinated)

It's the same reason why in almost every case, if a person believes in one conspiracy, they'll end up getting on board with several others.

Once that "don't trust the mainstream medical institutions" mentality is established, that doesn't seem to be an easy switch for people to turn back off.
You might be right and that even highly limited but reasonable applications of "alternative" medicine should be shunned because the ignorant or stupid will run with it and go whole hog.

But.... thats not the world I prefer, where certain limited but true things need to be suppressed because some people dont know when to stop, even when they are told. It might be the world we need as you note. But Im the selectively eternal optimist I guess.

However, none of this is not comparable to having the person at the head of national public health agencies simply contradicting the science that supports core prevention and possibly treatment methods.
 
Upvote 0

FireDragon76

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Apr 30, 2013
34,384
21,337
Orlando, Florida
✟1,649,323.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
United Ch. of Christ
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
When you consider the data mentioned, blanket preemptive dismissal would make actually make some sense.

Once the seed has been planted, you can't put the genie back into the bottle so to speak. (Hence the reason why people who go to those practitioners are 25-25% less likely to get vaccinated)

It's the same reason why in almost every case, if a person believes in one conspiracy, they'll end up getting on board with several others.

Once that "don't trust the mainstream medical institutions" mentality is established, that doesn't seem to be an easy switch for people to turn back off.

You're suggesting one causes the other, instead of merely correlated. People that reject vaccines, and people that go to alternative medical practitioners are outside the consensus, but that doesn't mean that using alternative medicine causes people to avoid vaccines.
 
Upvote 0

ThatRobGuy

Part of the IT crowd
Site Supporter
Sep 4, 2005
30,918
17,716
Here
✟1,625,576.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
You're suggesting one causes the other, instead of merely correlated. People that reject vaccines, and people that go to alternative medical practitioners are outside the consensus, but that doesn't mean that using alternative medicine causes people to avoid vaccines.

I think the data I provided earlier suggests more that just a casual correlation.

That's enhanced by the fact that (if you're familiar with what they're taught in those schools), it's not surprising.

They have done studies and surveys among that industry and found some rather concerning results

Per NIH/PubMed

Within the Chiropractic profession, only 35.7% of them would accept to be immunized in the future. Furthermore, only 56% of respondents had immunized their children and only 21% would refer patients for possible immunization. Russell et al40 reported that only 41% of chiropractors felt immunizations were safe in general, that 60% felt immunization should never be given to children under the age of 1, that 30% felt they should never be provided to the elderly and 37% of them advised their patients “against having themselves/their children immunized”. Finally, a recent study by Downey et al41 reported that children were significantly less likely to receive all four recommended vaccinations if they saw a naturopathic doctor and significantly less likely to receive three of the four recommended vaccinations if they saw a chiropractor.
 
Upvote 0

essentialsaltes

Fact-Based Lifeform
Oct 17, 2011
48,396
50,786
Los Angeles Area
✟1,130,876.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Legal Union (Other)

RFK Jr. Did Raw-Milk Shooters in the White House

[RFK Jr.] recorded an interview with wellness influencer Paul Saladino, which culminated in the two doing raw-milk shooters in the White House.

Nearly 60 Idahoans sick after drinking raw milk in past two weeks, officials say

Idaho health officials are investigating how nearly 60 people got sick after drinking raw milk in the past two weeks.

Investigating? I have a pretty good idea how they got sick.
 
Upvote 0

durangodawood

re Member
Aug 28, 2007
28,977
20,531
Colorado
✟578,872.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Single
Upvote 0

Hans Blaster

Reconstruction 3 will come
Mar 11, 2017
25,847
18,668
56
USA
✟485,588.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
Upvote 0

RocksInMyHead

God is innocent; Noah built on a floodplain!
Site Supporter
May 12, 2011
10,561
11,343
PA
✟507,447.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
Upvote 0

FreeinChrist

CF Advisory team
Christian Forums Staff
Site Advisor
Site Supporter
Jul 2, 2003
155,510
20,723
USA
✟2,214,322.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat

Nearly 60 Idahoans sick after drinking raw milk in past two weeks, officials say

Idaho health officials are investigating how nearly 60 people got sick after drinking raw milk in the past two weeks.

Investigating? I have a pretty good idea how they got sick.
Raw milk can contain E. Coli, or Salmonella, or Listeria or Campylobacter. Unless one is very sure of the source and that a high standard of cleanliness is maintained, there is a risk of infection.

I don't drink milk. I like some cheese, yogurt and ice cream and use cow's milk when the recipe calls for it. Cow's milk is designed to put about 500 pounds on a calf in one year. Don't need that.
 
Upvote 0

Bradskii

Under the Southern Cross I stand...
Aug 19, 2018
25,498
17,701
73
Bondi
✟434,024.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Insufficient pasteurization of their milk?
That's actually zero pasteurisation of their milk. But maybe it wasn't the milk. Perhaps there's a wind farm near them.
 
Upvote 0

Hans Blaster

Reconstruction 3 will come
Mar 11, 2017
25,847
18,668
56
USA
✟485,588.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
Upvote 0

Bradskii

Under the Southern Cross I stand...
Aug 19, 2018
25,498
17,701
73
Bondi
✟434,024.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
  • Like
Reactions: DaisyDay
Upvote 0

A2SG

Gumby
Jun 17, 2008
10,747
4,407
Massachusetts
✟215,366.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
I think someone said that they are slowly killing Wales as well: The slow death of Wales | David James | The Critic Magazine
Oh no! I hope someone comes from the future to rescue George and Gracie.

Kirk Spock STIV.png



-- A2SG, may have done a little too much LDS back in the sixties....
 
Upvote 0

A New Dawn

Bind my wandering heart to thee!
Site Supporter
Mar 18, 2004
71,952
8,441
Western New York
✟248,781.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican

Another source:


They are literally making stuff up to justify their policies.
Not so different from the “follow the science” crowd that told people that you can’t define what a woman is (when you can) and that boys could become girls and vice versa (when they can’t).
 
Upvote 0

A2SG

Gumby
Jun 17, 2008
10,747
4,407
Massachusetts
✟215,366.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
Not so different from the “follow the science” crowd that told people that you can’t define what a woman is (when you can) and that boys could become girls and vice versa (when they can’t).
Quite different, actually, since the scientific consensus on sex and gender is that they're not the same thing, and that neither is as simple or as binary as has been previously believed.

Many, many studies exist on this, unlike those cited by the MAHA report. Here's one:


-- A2SG, and you don't have to look far to find more.....
 
Upvote 0

DaisyDay

I Did Nothing Wrong!! ~~Team Deep State
Jan 7, 2003
44,162
21,384
Finger Lakes
✟373,587.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Unitarian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Not so different from the “follow the science” crowd that told people that you can’t define what a woman is (when you can) and that boys could become girls and vice versa (when they can’t).
Who said you "can't define what a woman is" when, contrariwise, there are a plethora of definitions to choose from depending on context? More confusingly, sometimes women are included in "all men" and sometimes they are excluded.
 
Upvote 0

Hans Blaster

Reconstruction 3 will come
Mar 11, 2017
25,847
18,668
56
USA
✟485,588.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
Not so different from the “follow the science” crowd that told people that you can’t define what a woman is (when you can) and that boys could become girls and vice versa (when they can’t).
The "MAHA" report (see OP) isn't about gender identity. The raw milk claims aren't about gender identity. The processed food claims aren't about gender identity. Vaccine claims aren't about gender identity. None of our conversation is about gender identity and the board is generally scared of discussion of gender identity, so KNOCK IT OFF and stick to the topic.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Bradskii

A New Dawn

Bind my wandering heart to thee!
Site Supporter
Mar 18, 2004
71,952
8,441
Western New York
✟248,781.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Quite different, actually, since the scientific consensus on sex and gender is that they're not the same thing, and that neither is as simple or as binary as has been previously believed.

Many, many studies exist on this, unlike those cited by the MAHA report. Here's one:


-- A2SG, and you don't have to look far to find more.....
You have misspoken. If gender is all that was at issue, there would have been no need for sex change operations. But yet sex change operations was promised as the cure for transgenderism. That’s because gender is considered linked to the sex your body presents. Sorry to burst your bubble.
 
Upvote 0

A New Dawn

Bind my wandering heart to thee!
Site Supporter
Mar 18, 2004
71,952
8,441
Western New York
✟248,781.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Who is specifically is this crowd, and when did they said this?
Everyone, it seems, in the Biden administration. All of the sudden everyone’s intelligence evaporated, from cabinet members to judges to college professors and people that should have known better (like doctors and psychiatrists/psychologists). And they said it every second of the last administration. Sorry you missed it. It was really amusing to see people bend over backwards to deny what they knew to be true.

It also happened with COVID.
 
Upvote 0