durangodawood
re Member
- Aug 28, 2007
- 27,586
- 19,268
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Seeker
- Marital Status
- Single
You might be right and that even highly limited but reasonable applications of "alternative" medicine should be shunned because the ignorant or stupid will run with it and go whole hog.When you consider the data mentioned, blanket preemptive dismissal would make actually make some sense.
Once the seed has been planted, you can't put the genie back into the bottle so to speak. (Hence the reason why people who go to those practitioners are 25-25% less likely to get vaccinated)
It's the same reason why in almost every case, if a person believes in one conspiracy, they'll end up getting on board with several others.
Once that "don't trust the mainstream medical institutions" mentality is established, that doesn't seem to be an easy switch for people to turn back off.
But.... thats not the world I prefer, where certain limited but true things need to be suppressed because some people dont know when to stop, even when they are told. It might be the world we need as you note. But Im the selectively eternal optimist I guess.
However, none of this is not comparable to having the person at the head of national public health agencies simply contradicting the science that supports core prevention and possibly treatment methods.
Upvote
0