• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Is the church infallible in Protestant theology?

MarkRohfrietsch

Unapologetic Apologist
Site Supporter
Dec 8, 2007
31,480
6,262
✟1,153,761.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
There is no overall Protestant position. No one is protesting anything anymore.
You are right about there being no overall Protestant position, infact, Protestant is a general term applied to all who are not Catholic (or Orthodox) to the rest of us. While relations have warmed a bit, between Confessional Lutherans and Catholics, the protests of both sides remain, but are now being explored through friendly dialogues; both "official" and "local". We have always shared more in common with Rome in our Sacramental Theology, Moral standards, and liturgical practices than we do with all the rest of reformed and protestant theologies.
All mainstream churches have common positions and interpretations and then there are different, but valid, interpretations.
This made me snicker; Christian Universalism is the biggest heresy to have come out of the last 2 centuries, and continues to grow.
It is. Christ church includes all Christians so all mainstream churches are the church. None has authority over the other.
I agree with this statement, Christ leads the Church, it is under the Authority of the Holy Spirit.
Paul understood that all of the churches he was planting were autonomous and self governing. The divisions began when the CC took over ecclesiastical authority from merely a positional authority. This is exemplified by the schisms of 451ad and the next one in 1054ad. The belief that it is my way or the highway will always create division. It seems that the CC has schisms every 600 years or so (451ad, 1054ad, and 1517ad). They are now due for the next.
The divisions began much earlier than the Catholic Church read the admonishments in The Revelation; that was only 7 Churches; Divisions come from the same place that all sin comes from; free will. The CC served as a moderating and normative factor for Churches in the west, even beyond the great schism with the east.
The CC created a kingdom. They used to be the largest landowner in Europe, would crown kings, would excommunicate those that disagree with it, and have a head of state for a leader. The CC is part of the world.
Actually, Churches model their governance on the secular governments where they originate. The CC was not so much a kingdom, but an Empire. The Orthodox is structured more like a group of independent Monarchies, the LCMS Governance is modeled of the US democracy, a Pracidium something we in LCC are in the midst of fixing. Yes, they are still part of this world.

We can certainly support each other and work together when we share the same goals and values, but to pretend all is just fine in reformed protestantism is ill informed.
 
Upvote 0

Hentenza

I will fear no evil for You are with me
Site Supporter
Mar 27, 2007
40,602
7,491
On the bus to Heaven
✟347,646.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
You are right about there being no overall Protestant position, infact, Protestant is a general term applied to all who are not Catholic (or Orthodox) to the rest of us. While relations have warmed a bit, between Confessional Lutherans and Catholics, the protests of both sides remain, but are now being explored through friendly dialogues; both "official" and "local". We have always shared more in common with Rome in our Sacramental Theology, Moral standards, and liturgical practices than we do with all the rest of reformed and protestant theologies.
Agreed.
This made me snicker; Christian Universalism is the biggest heresy to have come out of the last 2 centuries, and continues to grow.
I qualified my statement with “mainstream” churches so not to confuse them with cults. Christian Universalism is not mainstream. ;)
I agree with this statement, Christ leads the Church, it is under the Authority of the Holy Spirit.
Yep.
The divisions began much earlier than the Catholic Church read the admonishments in The Revelation; that was only 7 Churches; Divisions come from the same place that all sin comes from; free will. The CC served as a moderating and normative factor for Churches in the west, even beyond the great schism with the east.

Actually, Churches model their governance on the secular governments where they originate. The CC was not so much a kingdom, but an Empire. The Orthodox is structured more like a group of independent Monarchies, the LCMS Governance is modeled of the US democracy, a Pracidium something we in LCC are in the midst of fixing. Yes, they are still part of this world.

We can certainly support each other and work together when we share the same goals and values, but to pretend all is just fine in reformed protestantism is ill informed.
Reform theology is based on their interpretation of scripture. I don’t believe is right but then I also don’t think free will is right either. I think the truth lies somewhere in between.
 
Upvote 0

Mark Quayle

Monergist; and by reputation, Reformed Calvinist
Site Supporter
May 28, 2018
15,020
6,667
70
Pennsylvania
✟1,071,671.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Reformed
Marital Status
Widowed
Reform theology is based on their interpretation of scripture. I don’t believe is right but then I also don’t think free will is right either. I think the truth lies somewhere in between.
The truth is only what it is, no more and no less.

As someone who resembles the Reformed, but don't call myself by their name (nor by Calvinism), I can speak to some degree on their position, which is intentionally drawn on Scripture and good reason (whether successfully so or not). Almost without exception, those with whom I have spoken do not claim to be without error or need of correction.

And almost without exception they see the truth as what it is, alone, and not something that rests somewhere on a line between this or that. Our Lord Jesus Christ says, "I am the way, the truth and the life." just as he says, "I am the alpha and the omega", and, "before Abraham was, I AM". The Truth is. It does not depend on anything else. All else arranges itself around the truth --the truth does not accommodate to anything else.
 
Upvote 0

stevevw

inquisitive
Nov 4, 2013
18,427
2,193
Brisbane Qld Australia
✟372,394.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
There is no overall Protestant position. No one is protesting anything anymore.
Ok
All mainstream churches have common positions and interpretations and then there are different, but valid, interpretations.
What do you mean by mainstream ? Are there non mainstream churches ?. If they are different and valid then why do they have splits over what is valid. Why do they become divided.
It is. Christ church includes all Christians so all mainstream churches are the church. None has authority over the other.
How can it be Christ church with all these denominations divided and not unified under one spirit and mind. Clement said where there is division there is no Christ.
Paul understood that all of the churches he was planting were autonomous and self governing. The divisions began when the CC took over ecclesiastical authority from merely a positional authority. This is exemplified by the schisms of 451ad and the next one in 1054ad. The belief that it is my way or the highway will always create division. It seems that the CC has schisms every 600 years or so (451ad, 1054ad, and 1517ad). They are now due for the next.
As far as I understand all the churches were under the same mind and spirit and followed the same teachings. Paul would often say that the teachings were for all the saints of all the churches. None would deviate as far as the teachings.

Today we have different teachings for different churches.
The CC created a kingdom. They used to be the largest landowner in Europe, would crown kings, would excommunicate those that disagree with it, and have a head of state for a leader. The CC is part of the world.
I disagree. The core teachings of the CC are in line with the early church. I agree that the church became political and power hungry. But the core church was still the same and lives on today.

I think the CC is closer to the true church as it was from the beginning. It just needs to seperate itself politically and materially from the world. But the world has corrupted all denominations.

The true church of Christ should be hated by the world and not loved. It should be poor and living like Christ and helping the widows and children.
Perfect. This we definitely agree with.
:oldthumbsup:
 
Upvote 0

stevevw

inquisitive
Nov 4, 2013
18,427
2,193
Brisbane Qld Australia
✟372,394.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Which Church has suffered the most from the world's hatred?
Definitely the early church under Roman pagan rule in the first three centuries or so.

Since then I think there have been pockets or maybe individual churches around the world where they have displayed Christ and been persecuted for it.

Its usually by a world power such as State, dictator or funny enough other religions that mostly persecute Christians standing for Christ because Christ is truth and this exposes their sin and corruption and lies.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hentenza
Upvote 0

Hentenza

I will fear no evil for You are with me
Site Supporter
Mar 27, 2007
40,602
7,491
On the bus to Heaven
✟347,646.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Ok

What do you mean by mainstream ? Are there non mainstream churches ?. If they are different and valid then why do they have splits over what is valid. Why do they become divided.
Mainstream churches believe in the gospel and the person of Christ (think of the words of the Nicene Creed). Non mainstream churches are cults or “like” cults, examples would be JWs, Mormons, Oneness Pentecostals, Christadelphians, etc.
How can it be Christ church with all these denominations divided and not unified under one spirit and mind. Clement said where there is division there is no Christ.
And yet the church is composed of the body of believers. The believers that belong to one denomination are no less a Christian than one that belongs to another. For example, I attend a Baptist church while you might attend a different mainstream denomination. Both of us are Christian and part of the body of Christ. Both of us have the hope of salvation and both of us will go to the same heaven.

At the time of Clement, he was battling several heresies including gnostism and docetism. To him you either followed the early church or you follow a heretical group. In addition, there has been schisms throughout history including the schism of 451ad and 1054ad. The churches that broke with the CC did so because they believed that the CC fell in error and they had a different interpretation. These churches remained part of the body of Christ. I’m pretty sure you would not call them heretical.
As far as I understand all the churches were under the same mind and spirit and followed the same teachings. Paul would often say that the teachings were for all the saints of all the churches. None would deviate as far as the teachings.
They were, for a time. As the RC began to usurp power (from positional to ecclesiastical) the disagreements were there and growing culminating in the subsequent schisms.

Today we have different teachings for different churches.
There are interpretation differences.
I disagree. The core teachings of the CC are in line with the early church. I agree that the church became political and power hungry. But the core church was still the same and lives on today.
I don’t disagree in principle. However, history paints a church that fell to its own power. The historical abuses led the reformation. The CC needed reforming.
I think the CC is closer to the true church as it was from the beginning. It just needs to seperate itself politically and materially from the world. But the world has corrupted all denominations.
I think the EO are more representative of the early church but I still disagree with some interpretations.
The true church of Christ should be hated by the world and not loved. It should be poor and living like Christ and helping the widows and children.
And if you notice, Christians in general are being demonized worldwide by those that consider our teachings to promote hate even by countries that used to be primarily Christian like Canada and England.

Today the largest charities are Christian charities and those are ran by different denominations not just one.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

jas3

Well-Known Member
Jan 21, 2023
1,496
1,085
The South
✟132,716.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
At the time of Clement, he was battling several heresies including gnostism and docetism. To him you either followed the early church or you follow a heretical group.
St. Clement didn't say anything about gnosticism or docetism, though, or anything else about the orthodoxy of the people who had usurped the local clergy. He specifically addressed and condemned people who thought the local congregation could depose clergy with apostolic succession and ordain their own leaders (hey, that sounds familiar...)
 

prodromos

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Nov 28, 2003
25,427
17,063
60
Sydney, Straya
✟1,649,907.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
Definitely the early church under Roman pagan rule in the first three centuries or so.

Since then I think there have been pockets or maybe individual churches around the world where they have displayed Christ and been persecuted for it.

Its usually by a world power such as State, dictator or funny enough other religions that mostly persecute Christians standing for Christ because Christ is truth and this exposes their sin and corruption and lies.
In terms of persecution, the Eastern Orthodox Church is hated by far the most by the world, if that is the metric you want to use for identifying the Church.
 

Hentenza

I will fear no evil for You are with me
Site Supporter
Mar 27, 2007
40,602
7,491
On the bus to Heaven
✟347,646.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
St. Clement didn't say anything about gnosticism or docetism, though, or anything else about the orthodoxy of the people who had usurped the local clergy. He specifically addressed and condemned people who thought the local congregation could depose clergy with apostolic succession and ordain their own leaders (hey, that sounds familiar...)
lol I can see how you would think that and I don’t blame you. The issues in Corinth were quite deep. Paul’s epistles to the Corinthians addresses the major issues going on throughout Paul’s life and one of the biggest was the battle against proto-gnostism/dualism and Hellenistic philosophy influence. There is no indication that the Christians of Corinth changed their ways even after Paul’s death. Clement merely continued exposing the same issues.
 

stevevw

inquisitive
Nov 4, 2013
18,427
2,193
Brisbane Qld Australia
✟372,394.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Mainstream churches believe in the gospel and the person of Christ (think of the words of the Nicene Creed). Non mainstream churches are cults or “like” cults, examples would be JWs, Mormons, Oneness Pentecostals, Christadelphians, etc.
Ok and I agree. You could add a lot more. But is this not an outgrowth of protestantism. The idea that there are different ways about how to interpret Gods word and Christs teachings. It sort of invites division by making the truth relative to human ideas and not Gods.
And yet the church is composed of the body of believers. The believers that belong to one denomination are no less a Christian than one that belongs to another. For example, I attend a Baptist church while you might attend a different mainstream denomination. Both of us are Christian and part of the body of Christ. Both of us have the hope of salvation and both of us will go to the same heaven.
I agree that Christians can come from different denominations. It would be political and against Christs church to say that Christians can belong to only one or certain denominations and churches.

But this is based on the assumption that these churches are of Christ. I am sure most people from most denominations will say they are true Christians going to heaven. The nature of belief in the world makes it easy for humans to believe lies as the truth. This is the nature of the wolves.

But I basically agree that the spirit will identify those of Christ no matter where they are. I could go to a far away place and meet a brother in Christ that came from a completely different and alien background to myself and be of one mind and spirit The identity is not by any denomination or creed but by the spirits fruits.
At the time of Clement, he was battling several heresies including gnostism and docetism. To him you either followed the early church or you follow a heretical group. In addition, there has been schisms throughout history including the schism of 451ad and 1054ad. The churches that broke with the CC did so because they believed that the CC fell in error and they had a different interpretation. These churches remained part of the body of Christ. I’m pretty sure you would not call them heretical.
I think originally this was a difference within the church that like the first counsel with Peter and Paul could have been settled properly. But it became a division which then led to other differences and divisions. Eventually to completely different denominations.

So the church needs to humility in Christ. But I am not sure everyone will want to become unified as one as human pride is a powerful force. Especially in an age of identity politics that have crept into the church.

But I do hear of reconciliations between some denominations and churches happening around the world. So Gods spirit is at work.
They were, for a time. As the RC began to usurp power (from positional to ecclesiastical) the disagreements were there and growing culminating in the subsequent schisms.
Yes I think this was the inevitable situation where the church gathered too much power due to its fast development. Though I think there was always the core of Christs church in the background.

Just like in ancient times when Gods people or a nation rejected God there was always a reminant of Godly people to keep Gods promise. The same with Christs church.
There are interpretation differences.
Is this not significant and the very thing Christ warned about that would come into the church and fool even the elect. Deceptive interpretations that many will be fooled by. Only the fruits of the spirit can decern this in the end. But it may be hard for many to know the truth if they are not fully invested in Christ.
I don’t disagree in principle. However, history paints a church that fell to its own power. The historical abuses led the reformation. The CC needed reforming.
I think this has been the pattern throughout biblical history. People rising to greatness in God only to fall away after time believing they know better. But each time Gods people come through.

The same with Christs church as hades will never defeat it. Therefore I think we should expect that after so many years of falling away that Gods people in Christ will rise again. This is the cycle of Gods promise in Christ until satan is defeated for all time.
I think the EO are more representative of the early church but I still disagree with some interpretations.
I think any church that follows the early church example is the true church.

In some ways the conditions are becoming the same as in the early church today. We have had a fairly long period where the church has been accepted and allowed to grow.

But in recent times God and Christians are being pushed to the fringes and even hated.

In some ways Christ church will naturally rise up as the world and Christ become more conflicted. Then peoples faith will be tested and then we will see a mighty spiritual church. In some places its already happening.
And if you notice, Christians in general are being demonized worldwide by those that consider our teachings to promote hate even by countries that used to be primarily Christian like Canada and England.
Yes I agree. For the first time in a long time the church of the west is being rejected as a result of a growing rejection of God. But also world wide. A reigniting of persecution specifically against Christians.

But perhaps not just Christians but also Jews. Which shows the hate is deep. Almost returning to the ancient tribes rising up again in their modern forms against God.
Today the largest charities are Christian charities and those are ran by different denominations not just one.
Yes and these charities began out of love in Christ. Putting their faith in practice. I was saved by one of them. But today we have to be weary as satan has got into the business of helping others to remain relevant.

Helping others has become a social credit in marketing for the world to virtue signal they are good and worthy.

So satan and the wolves are using every trick in the book to make themselve slook very much like Christs church.

I go back to Clements idea. If people are wanting something out of helping others then this is a sign of bad fruit. In fact the church should have nothing. Everyone willing to sacrifice this world for God and others.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

FredVB

Regular Member
Mar 11, 2010
5,345
1,097
America
Visit site
✟367,911.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Unifying broadly only happens with positions of authority. But this is from human effort, what should matter to us is authority of God. We are given our conscience and availability of God's word as the Bible, with its translation by people hopefully faithful enough to language we understand. For this it is yet better to refer to more than one translation. Some dismiss the Bible and will just have their conscience to go by. Some go by their Bible translation and dismiss their conscience. Neither is an adequately good way. When we find ways that are of God's will, it does not matter that authority for unity is missing, we can live accordingly we will find some others in agreement and have unity with those.
 
Upvote 0

The Liturgist

Traditional Liturgical Christian
Site Supporter
Nov 26, 2019
17,820
9,620
51
The Wild West
✟960,343.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Generic Orthodox Christian
Marital Status
Celibate
In terms of persecution, the Eastern Orthodox Church is hated by far the most by the world, if that is the metric you want to use for identifying the Church.

With our Oriental Orthodox brethren also being extremely despised, since most people are unaware of the distinction and also historically the lines have often been blurred, and at present are blurred to a particular extent thanks to the ecumenical agreements between the Antiochian Orthodox and Syriac Orthodox and the Alexandrian and Coptic Orthodox and the love shown for the Armenians by the Eastern Orthodox with divine liturgies being held in our churches with their bishops as guests on the anniversary of the Genocide (which did also involve the death of a majority of the Pontic Greeks; with regards to the genocide the Armenians saw the highest body count, the Suroye (Assyrians/Syriac Christians) lost the largest percentage of their population, as high as 90%, and the Pontic Greeks were the most thoroughly “ethnically cleansed” from Turkey due to the population transfer agreement which resulted in the expulsion of all ethnic Greeks outside of Constantinople where the Phanar and a few other dwindling populations remained (with the Metropolis of Bursa becoming titular just over a decade ago and alas the Metropolitan under whose watch that happened is now the Archbishop of the only canonical Orthodox church in North America with serious problems of declining membership).