• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

The utter failure of Christian influence.

FireDragon76

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Apr 30, 2013
34,384
21,338
Orlando, Florida
✟1,649,653.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
United Ch. of Christ
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
It is often argued that our secular society gives rise to more sinfulness and also argues that a greater Christian presence would reduce sinfulness. That said, here are the facts. 68% of the South Eastern U.S. are Christians. Far greater than any other region. Yet of all the areas of the United States the South East is highest in the following: divorce; teen pregnancy; obesity; homicide; poverty; smoking; infant mortality and also lowest in life expectancy. Is this not a clear cut failure of the claims about Christian influence?? (If you don't believe the statements, look them up yourself before responding.)

It's the Puritans vs. Cavaliers dynamic. The South was settled by Cavaliers, the North by Puritans. Cavaliers valued social hierarchy as a divine right, with religion having a two-tierd structure: "grace for me, not for thee". Cultural evangelicalism in the South tends to go hand in hand with a history of being chaplain to the feudal southern economy that has a dark pseudo-Calvinist view of inequality - basically some people are rich because they are your "betters", and hard-edge fundamentalism is sold to the lower classes to discipline them and separate out the wheat from the tares.
 
Upvote 0

Maine Progressive

The war bow. God uses metaphors.
Feb 16, 2026
303
85
78
Bangor
✟11,448.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
It's the Puritans vs. Cavaliers dynamic. The South was settled by Cavaliers, the North by Puritans. Cavaliers valued social hierarchy as a divine right, with religion having a two-tierd structure: "grace for me, not for thee". Cultural evangelicalism in the South tends to go hand in hand with a history of being chaplain to the feudal southern economy that has a dark pseudo-Calvinist view of inequality - basically some people are rich because they are your "betters", and hard-edge fundamentalism is sold to the lower classes to discipline them and separate out the wheat from the tares.
It is the influential factor. Perhaps the keystone upon which rests the Southeast's demonstration of moral failure with regard to the eight factors listed in my OP. With respect to the argument 'America would be better if there was more Christian influence', the Southeast might look to the times when that was true. The influence of Chrisitians in America shown in the creation of colleges, hospitals, nursing schools, universal education, birthright citizenship, abolition, "certain unalienable Rights", etc. It seems those influences have shaped present day secularism. So it is both sad and ironic that today's secular influences do a better job of dealing with the eight 'sins' mentioned in the OP. It is my hope that as the world shrinks and secular influence grows in the Southeast that change for the better will slowly arise. So, perhaps it is true, that in a very, very odd roundabout way, Christian influence will eventually make the Southeast better.
 
Upvote 0

JustaPewFiller

Well-Known Member
Apr 1, 2024
414
304
60
Florida
✟84,708.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
As I'm in the SE, I'll pass this along..

I have no idea if it applies outside my little area, I don't want to paint with too broad a brush.

I was talking with a ministry leader who does work with the poor, at-risk and homeless in the local area. We were talking about ways the local churches could help. The person said, "There are churches who help, but many churches won't go beyond preaching at them or praying for them if asked."

To me, that is a "talking the talk, but not walking the walk" problem.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dlamberth
Upvote 0

Maine Progressive

The war bow. God uses metaphors.
Feb 16, 2026
303
85
78
Bangor
✟11,448.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
Regarding the pattern of "won't go beyond preaching...or praying..." I think your point is well made. Honestly, I suspect that if some capable and reliable research agency were to perform a study of churches throughout the U.S. there would probably not be a statistical difference between the Southeast and the rest of this county's churches. I don't think this situation has anything to do with which churches are better. My observation is just that the U.S. states with less Christian influence do better (though certainly not adequately) than the Southeastern states.
 
Upvote 0

FireDragon76

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Apr 30, 2013
34,384
21,338
Orlando, Florida
✟1,649,653.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
United Ch. of Christ
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
Regarding the pattern of "won't go beyond preaching...or praying..." I think your point is well made. Honestly, I suspect that if some capable and reliable research agency were to perform a study of churches throughout the U.S. there would probably not be a statistical difference between the Southeast and the rest of this county's churches. I don't think this situation has anything to do with which churches are better. My observation is just that the U.S. states with less Christian influence do better (though certainly not adequately) than the Southeastern states.

The dynamics are more complicated than simply "public religion causes dysfunction". What is true is that religion in the southeast rarely challenges entrenched power interests that go hand in hand with poverty and exploitation of workers and the environment.
 
Upvote 0

Maine Progressive

The war bow. God uses metaphors.
Feb 16, 2026
303
85
78
Bangor
✟11,448.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
The dynamics are more complicated than simply "public religion causes dysfunction". What is true is that religion in the southeast rarely challenges entrenched power interests that go hand in hand with poverty and exploitation of workers and the environment.
That's exactly what I am trying to point out. "religion in the southeast rarely challenges entrenched power interests". They could. They claim their influence would be better for the country. But they don't. Even though they have greater means to influence that region of the U.S. More than in any other. Yes, the dynamics are complicated. Perhaps it can't be changed (see next paragraph). But, however complicated, it clearly demonstrates that a predominance of Christian influence is no guarantee of a better country...and in the example of the Southeast, it's worse than secular influences.
(I'm not saying Southeast Christians are bad. I'm saying they have failed to live up to their calling. I'm urging them to do better. I think they could. Perhaps I'm wrong in that. But I believe they could.)
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

linux.poet

Love does not insist on its own way
Christian Forums Staff
Purple Team - Moderator
Angels Team
CF Senior Ambassador
Site Supporter
Apr 25, 2022
7,711
2,934
Poway
✟527,016.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Republican

MOD HAT ON

This thread has been moved from Ethics and Morality to Christian Philosophy & Ethics.

A cleanup of unbeliever posts was done as part of this move.​

MOD HAT OFF

 
Upvote 0

stevevw

inquisitive
Nov 4, 2013
18,206
2,136
Brisbane Qld Australia
✟367,005.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Stats are very misleading. It will depend on exactly what is being looked at and the factors and context around this. It will depend on the qualifying questions asked or not included. Which will influence the outcome.

For example who says that the Christians involved are Christians. Is there any qualification of this. Or is is just based on an unsubstanciated claim that the person is a practicing Christian.

I would say if you looked at actual practicing Christians then this would greatly change the outcome. Because they are living Christian values and not just saying they are. Its like a politician claiming they are for Rule of Law and then acting like they deny the same. Or someone claimed to be a socialist living like a capitalist.

Its the principle or value that is in question. The fact is Christian values work and show they produce the best results for individuals, children, families and society and nations as a whole.

And why not. Christian morals uphold all the values that people say is good. Having a committed monogamous marriage, a mother and father involved in upbringing. Teaching sexual morality, loving others as you love yourself and that all people are of divine value as Gods children made in Gods image. Regardless of identity.

Now compare this to secular ideas which destroy individuals, families, undermine mothers and fathers, promote promiscuity, even as a right and individual rights over all else in the name of sinful pride. Abort millions of Gods created life, tell young people they can mutilate their bodies.

Claim there is no innate male and females, create wars between the sexes, race and gender with identity politics. Undermine their own societies and nation by attacking the very values that allowed freedom, domocracy and Rule of Law and invite hate and chaos.

What is the moral basis for those who criticise Christianity to be able to do this in the first place ? Secular ideology believes in moral relativism. There is no single truth to morality or how people and society should be ordered.

By what basis do skeptics claim that anything is wrong. Let alone Christianity ?
 
Last edited:
  • Winner
Reactions: Rescued One
Upvote 0

Maine Progressive

The war bow. God uses metaphors.
Feb 16, 2026
303
85
78
Bangor
✟11,448.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
Stats are very misleading. It will depend on exactly what is being looked at and the factors and context around this. It will depend on the qualifying questions asked or not included. Which will influence the outcome.

For example who says that the Christians involved are Christians. Is there any qualification of this. Or is is just based on an unsubstanciated claim that the person is a practicing Christian.

I would say if you looked at actual practicing Christians then this would greatly change the outcome. Because they are living Christian values and not just saying they are. Its like a politician claiming they are for Rule of Law and then acting like they deny the same.

Its the principle or value that is in question. The fact is Christian values work and show they produce the best results for individuals, children and society and nations as a whole.

And why not. Christian morals uphold all the values that people say is good. Having a committed monogamous marriage, a mother and father involved in upbringing. Teaching sexual morality, loving others as you love yourself and that all people are of divine value as Gods children made in Gods image. Regardless of identity.

Now compare this to secular ideas which destroy individuals, families, undermine mothers and fathers, promote promiscuity, even as a right and individual rights over all else in the name of sinful pride. Abort millions of Gods created life, tell young people they can mutilate their bodies.

Claim there is no innate male and females, create wars between the sexes, race and gender with identity politics. Undermine their own societies and nation by attacking the very values that allowed freedom, domocracy and Rule of Law and invite hate and chaos.

What is the moral basis for those who criticise Christianity to be able to do this in the first place. Secular ideology believes in moral relativism. There is no single truth to morality or how people and society should be ordered.

By what basis do skeptics claim that anything is wrong. Let alone Christianity.
Very thorough comments. However, if you simply look at the facts, you would realize most of your morality statements made here arise from misperceptions. I won't belabor that with you. Given time, I think you will moderate them. What I will address is 'by what basis'. On the basis of the facts. You claim "Christian values work and show they produce the best results for individuals, children and society and nations as a whole." Specifically "nations as a whole". The numbers do not support you. You say "unsubstantiated claim that the person is a practicing Christian.” I am not claiming that of one person. I am pointing out that 68% of the entire Southeast region claims to be active Christians. I am not disputing that some are not practicing Christians. But are you suggesting Southeast Christians are worse than the rest of the United States? I’m not. The rest of the United States has far fewer people who claim to be active Christian. Yet within that more secular region the eight wrong conditions I listed in my OP are better reduced. Why is it that a more secular region of the country does better morally with regard to those specific moral responsibilities? I believe it is reasonable that a region with a much greater percentage of active Christians should at least be able to address those harms as well as secular regions. But they don’t. Thus I believe it is eminently fair to conclude they have failed. I do not contend that all eight can be completely eliminated. I’m just saying that with a significant Christian majority they should be able to do a least a little better than all the rest of the United States. So, unless you are arguing that Southeast Christians as a whole do not practice their Christianity even enough to do better than secularists, then I think my point is valid. The failure to do better with the eight conditions I listed shows that Christian influence does not produce a better country.
 
Upvote 0

stevevw

inquisitive
Nov 4, 2013
18,206
2,136
Brisbane Qld Australia
✟367,005.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Very thorough comments. However, if you simply look at the facts, you would realize most of your morality statements made here arise from misperceptions. I won't belabor that with you. Given time, I think you will moderate them. What I will address is 'by what basis'. On the basis of the facts. You claim "Christian values work and show they produce the best results for individuals, children and society and nations as a whole." Specifically "nations as a whole". The numbers do not support you.
How could there even be numbers when there has been no Christian nation ? As the skeptics say the US was never a Christian nation. So we don't know.

Not that it would even work in the first place. To have a Christian nation means exactly that. You would have to somehow enforce it for everyone. A theocracy no less. Which is impossible.

But on a smaller scale if Christian values are followed there is no logical reason why it would not be the best possible way to live. Compared to other ways. The main basis would be that there is an objective moral basis for Christianity as opposed to a relative one for secular society. That alone leads to better outcomes as far as morality is concerned.
You say "unsubstantiated claim that the person is a practicing Christian.” I am not claiming that of one person. I am pointing out that 68% of the entire Southeast region claims to be active Christians. I am not disputing that some are not practicing Christians. But are you suggesting Southeast Christians are worse than the rest of the United States? I’m not.
How can they be practicing Christians if they are breaking Christian morals and teachings ? Thats a contradiction. Your citing examples of anti Christian behaviour to dispute Christian values. Comparing apples with oranges.

Its a contradiction in that the behaviour your citing is not the result of Christs teachings. Its breaking Christs teachings. Don't blame Christs teachings.

You can use the entire nation that may claim they are Christians. But if they are breaching Christs teachings then they are the wolves and not Christians.

I could cite examples of Christians who have good results and this would contradict your findings. Depending on which stats and examples you want to use. This alone does not mean Christian values are bad. It just means some people are hypocrites and don't practice what they preach.
The rest of the United States has far fewer people who claim to be active Christian. Yet within that more secular region the eight wrong conditions I listed in my OP are better reduced. Why is it that a more secular region of the country does better morally with regard to those specific moral responsibilities?
You tell me as there is no rational basis for morality. This is where the arguement breaks down. Even if we accept the claims. It does not tell us why people may behave better because there is no moral basis to ground what is right or wrong.

Which makes me wonder what is the basis for determining the results. It may be economics which has nothing to do with religion. I don't know the details of the surveys or stats ect. And the assumptions may be wrong. For example Christians are suppose to give their possessions to help others or even lose their life. Which is not a good outcome under the secular ideology.

All I know is that Christs teachings are good and this is an objective basis that guides people to do good when followed. It will produce good outcomes. Whereas under secular ideology there is no basis to measure what is good or bad. It is a human made determination.
I believe it is reasonable that a region with a much greater percentage of active Christians should at least be able to address those harms as well as secular regions. But they don’t. Thus I believe it is eminently fair to conclude they have failed.
This is a different arguement to whether Christianity itself is bad. This is more about people not living to their belief. Being hypocrites. I agree if people are claiming to be Christians and yet are living like anti Christians then they are doubly condemned.

But don't judge Christianity by the hypocrites. The church has always been in the background cleaning up the mess created by society without pay. Many good Christians quietly being Christlike. If it was not for this society would be so much worse off.
I do not contend that all eight can be completely eliminated. I’m just saying that with a significant Christian majority they should be able to do a least a little better than all the rest of the United States. So, unless you are arguing that Southeast Christians as a whole do not practice their Christianity even enough to do better than secularists, then I think my point is valid. The failure to do better with the eight conditions I listed shows that Christian influence does not produce a better country.
Yes if Christians would live like the bible says. What Christ and the disciples teach. Like the early church. Then there would be no charges against them for being hypocrites and people would see Christ.

This would be a radical example that no one could live up to without Christ. That they make themselves suffer to help others and even die for them. No secular ideology comes close to this.

But I am not sure the stats are right and reflect the true nature. As far as I understand things have become worse as society and nations have moved away from God in one way or another.

Its a hard issue to determine and has so many factors. I don't think its a simple antedotes and out of context stats. I would have to see the original survey or study.
 
Last edited:
  • Winner
Reactions: Rescued One
Upvote 0

Maine Progressive

The war bow. God uses metaphors.
Feb 16, 2026
303
85
78
Bangor
✟11,448.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
How could there even by numbers when there has been no Christian nation. As the skeptics say the US was never a Christian nation. So we don't know.

Not that it would even work in the first place. To have a Christian nation means exactly that. You would have to somehow enforce it for everyone. A theocracy no less. Which is impossible.

But on a smaller scale if Christian values are followed there is no logical reason why it would not be the best possible way to live. Compared to other ways. The main basis would be that there is an objective moral basis as opposed to a relative one. That alone leads to better outcomes as far as morality is concerned.

How can they be practicing Christians if they are breaking Christian morals and teachings. Thats a contradiction. Your citing examples of anti Christian behaviour to dispute Christian values. Comparing apples with oranges. Its a contradiction in that the behaviour your citing is not the result of Christs teachings. Its breaking Christs teachings.

You can use the entire nation that may claim they are Christians. But if they are breaching Christs teachings then they are the wolves and not Christians. The very thing Christ said that would decieve His church.

You tell me as there is no rational basis for morality. This is where the arguement breaks down. Even if we accept the claims. It does not tell us why people may behave better because there is no moral basis to ground what is right or wrong.

Which makes me wonder what is the basis for determining the results. It may be economics which has nothing to do with religion. I don't know the details of the surveys or stats ect.

All I know is that Christs teachings are good and this is an objective basis that guides people to do good when followed. It will produce good outcomes. Whereas under secular ideology there is no basis to measure what is good or bad. It is a human made determination.

This is a different arguement to whether Christianity itself is bad. This is more about people not living to their belief. Being hypocrites. I agree if people are claiming to be Christians and yet are living like anti Christians then they are doubly condemned.

But don't judge Christianity by the hypocrites. The church has always been in the background cleaning up the mess created by society without pay. Many good Christians quietly being Christlike. If it was not for this society would be so much worse off.

Yes if Christians would live like the bible says. What Christ and the disciples teach. Like the early church. Then there would be no charges against them for being hypocrites and people would see Christ.

This would be a radical example that no one could live up to without Christ. That they make themselves suffer to help others and even die for them. No secular ideology comes close to this.

But I am not sure the stats are right and reflect the true nature. As far as I understand things have become worse as society and nations have moved away from God in one way or another. Its a hard issue to determine and has so many factors. I don't think its a simple antedotes and out of context stats. I would have to see the original survey or study.
Well, really, do your own research. Please. Don't just say you doubt my factual claims. These are not anecdotal. Nor out of context. Check for yourself. I have no desire to lie to you. But the facts are the facts. 68% of the Southeast claims to be Christian. Yet their influence to address the eight immoral conditions I listed is less than the effectiveness of much more secular regions. Again, do your own research. I wasn't lying. Also, economically there are deep pockets of economic stress in many secular areas of the U.S. Yet those same areas do better than the Southeast. And, as you say, "this is a different argument to whether Christianity is bad". Thanks! I'm glad you finally see that. I am a Christian. I have been saved by Christ. My life has been changed by Christ. I believe that is true for many, many Southeast Christians. We are not bad. But we have failed. Consistently. The facts don't lie. We cannot claim that Christian influence would make our country better as long as the region we can influence most heavily actually does worse, morally, than the other secular regions. It's just facts. So, could we make a difference? Sure. We could. But we don't. And as long as the Southeast continues to prove that, we are lying if we claim our country would do better if Christians had more influence in it.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Rescued One

...yet not I, but the grace of God that is with me
Dec 12, 2002
36,638
7,062
Midwest
✟164,444.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Widowed
Seriously, I am not pointing out a pocket of 'bad' Christians. I don't think Christians in Southeastern U.S. are any worse than Christians throughout the U.S. I am only pointing out that they have better numbers in the South East states and yet they perform worse than the rest of the U.S. Hence, obviously, they have failed to influence their surrounding population away from sin and have failed worse than the more secular regions of the U.S. For the sake of discussion let's say you are right. Let's say the things listed are less 'problematic' for secular types. But even if they care less about those things than Christians, yet they are doing a better job of reducing them. If Christians living in the greatest concentration do worse than secular regions, I would call that a failure of influence.
God knows which people are Christians; you don't. You seem to think you are high and mighty and I don't know if you hate Southerners or Christians. There is no such thing as a bad Chritian. If he's bad, he is not a Christian. What you're saying is nonsense.
 
Upvote 0

Maine Progressive

The war bow. God uses metaphors.
Feb 16, 2026
303
85
78
Bangor
✟11,448.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
God knows which people are Christians; you don't. You seem to think you are high and mighty and I don't know if you hate Southerners or Christians. There is no such thing as a bad Chritian. If he's bad, he is not a Christian. What you're saying is nonsense.
First I deeply apologize for having offended you. I hope you can understand that you have completely misunderstood what I am saying. I do not hate Southerners. I have stated several times that Southern Christians are no worse than any other part of the country. And I am a born again Christian myself. I do not hate Christians. I am deeply concerned that many Christians have deluded themselves claiming that our country would be better if there was more Christian influence. I point to the bare truth that the Southeast with many more Christians than anywhere else in the U.S. still does a worse job of addressing the eight immoral conditions listed in my OP. This is not about Southeast Christians being bad. They aren't. This is about the false claim that America would be better if there was more Christian influence. The Southeast clearly demonstrates that isn't true. I wish it was true. I wish Christians everywhere would take up those eight causes and show the country that they can do better than the secularists. I know they could, if they would. But they don't. And that is what frustrates me and disappoints me. And that is why I think, with clear reason, we have failed.
 
Upvote 0

Rescued One

...yet not I, but the grace of God that is with me
Dec 12, 2002
36,638
7,062
Midwest
✟164,444.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Widowed
(staff edit)
I agree that poverty becomes ingrained and is very difficult to address. That doesn't excuse giving up. And I don't think you meant we should. However, within that limitation, i.e. 'poverty is often intractable', yet secular regions which have no less problem with poverty STILL do better overall at reducing poverty. My point is not that the Southeast is at fault for poverty, but that despite having a predominance of Christians they still do WORSE than secular regions. Which illustrates that the argument for 'Christian influence is better for America' is demonstrably false given the state of poverty in the Southeastern regions.
You still think you are a judge of who is Christian and who isn't. You're failing in that endeavor.
 
Upvote 0

Rescued One

...yet not I, but the grace of God that is with me
Dec 12, 2002
36,638
7,062
Midwest
✟164,444.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Widowed
Msine Progressive, you have not offended me.

Read my posts. I disagree with you on many levels. I am NOT a southerner. Ive lived and visited many states. You don't know who is a Christian and who is not God brings peope to Christ and thereafter begins conforming them to the image of His Son. A limitless number of people attend churches without ever receiving the new birth.
 
Upvote 0

FireDragon76

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Apr 30, 2013
34,384
21,338
Orlando, Florida
✟1,649,653.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
United Ch. of Christ
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
First I deeply apologize for having offended you. I hope you can understand that you have completely misunderstood what I am saying. I do not hate Southerners. I have stated several times that Southern Christians are no worse than any other part of the country. And I am a born again Christian myself. I do not hate Christians. I am deeply concerned that many Christians have deluded themselves claiming that our country would be better if there was more Christian influence.

It's become a weapon some politicians and cultural pundits use - a symbol to rally some people uncomfortable with cultural and political changes. When you look at it closely, it begs the question of whose Christianity is being advocated. Jerry Fallwell and Fred Rogers were both Christians in the general sense, after all, but both advocated for very different ways of engaging with the world. Usually, what the pundits are advocating for is some form of reactionary politics divorced from critical thought.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: timothyu
Upvote 0

stevevw

inquisitive
Nov 4, 2013
18,206
2,136
Brisbane Qld Australia
✟367,005.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Well, really, do your own research. Please. Don't just say you doubt my factual claims.
I already gave the factual basis why secular ideology and morality doesn't work compared to Christianity. Christians believe in an objective basis for morality and how society and the world should be ordered.

Whereas secular ideology has no objective basis and is relative. This means secular morality does not even have a basis to compare with Christians fullstop. Its a human made morality and ideology and therefore has no factual basis.

So comparing Christianity to secular morality makes no sense because there is nothing within secular morality to compare with. If you were comparing Christian morality with Christian living up to that morality then thats ok. But not Christian to secular because it cannot be done.
These are not anecdotal. Nor out of context. Check for yourself.
"Anecdotal" describes information, arguments, or evidence based on one or two correlations that are not necessarily causes. I am not disputing your stats but rather that this is the cause of the problems like divorce.

For example secular society broadly reject the idea of marriage. Marriage has decreased in secular society. You are going to find higher rates of divorce within Christians because they are more likely to marry.

But the stats for breakdowns in relationships including families may be much higher in secular society. They just don't reflect this with divorce because they don't marry as much to get divorced. So its not a true reflection of the situation.

Poverty is another factor that may cause family breakdowns or teen pregnacies or crime and murder. Which has nothing to do with Christianity and yet may be a factor in why there are high rates of these issues.

Another factor noted was that Christian teens may not use contraception like non Christian communities. The rate of sexual promisquity may be higher in secular society but they use contraception more. Thus a Christian teen may only have sex once or twice and they get pregnant because its taboo for them to have sex in the first place. Thus distorting the reality that Christian teens have less sex overall.

You have to include all the factors otherwise it gives a false connection and cause.
I have no desire to lie to you. But the facts are the facts. 68% of the Southeast claims to be Christian. Yet their influence to address the eight immoral conditions I listed is less than the effectiveness of much more secular regions. Again, do your own research. I wasn't lying.
But how do you know those who claim to be Christians are Christians. Has anyone checked this to see if its correct. People may put on a survey they are Christian when they have not attended church r practiced Christianity in years. You can't just take their words for it.

But I am not sure what your point is. Are you arguing that there are Christians who don't practice what they preach and produce bad results compared to secular society. Or are you saying these poor results for Christians shows that secular societies morals and ideas are better than Christianity in general.
Also, economically there are deep pockets of economic stress in many secular areas of the U.S. Yet those same areas do better than the Southeast. And, as you say, "this is a different argument to whether Christianity is bad". Thanks! I'm glad you finally see that. I am a Christian.
That cannot be true as survey after survey show that poverty alone is associated with the highest rates of all these negative issues. Regardless of religion or politics ect. I can show you high rates of teen pregnancies, murder, crime and famility breakdown in all sorts of demographics which are not Christian. Therefore it negates the claim that just Christians suffer this at the highest rates.

Its also strange. A religion that is anti murder, teen pregnancies, and divorce having a higher rate of these issues in a church congregation compared to say the Hood seems crazy. Completely different sets of morals which have to influence outcomes.

Its like saying the hood is the church and the church is the hood. I don't think thats the case.

Plus who said being poor is bad. The bible says Christians should live with little money and give it away to help others. They make themselves poor for Gods Kingdom. How do you know Christians are not sacrificing wealth to love and help others.

This is what I mean by correlations are not causes. You have to determine the true cuase of teen pregnacies, murder, divorce ect and not just assume its all because of Christianity.
I have been saved by Christ. My life has been changed by Christ. I believe that is true for many, many Southeast Christians. We are not bad. But we have failed. Consistently. The facts don't lie. We cannot claim that Christian influence would make our country better as long as the region we can influence most heavily actually does worse, morally, than the other secular regions. It's just facts. So, could we make a difference? Sure. We could. But we don't. And as long as the Southeast continues to prove that, we are lying if we claim our country would do better if Christians had more influence in it.
I think this is a strange way to spread the gospel. The gospel stands on its own. It is not the results of people or claims of Christians that makes Christainity. Otherwise we could never confidently declare the gospel as truth that will not only save people in this world but forever.

You say you are a saved Christian. Then could you ever see yourself allowing a world with teen pregnancy, abortion, murder, glutony, and the breakdown of Gods marriage and families.

So whatever is happening in the South East it ain't Christianity. But some false ideology. Which I agree is not good and hypocritical.

Culture: Christian marriage & divorce
Research consistently shows that committed Christian couples who regularly attend church experience better marital outcomes, including higher relationship satisfaction, lower divorce rates, and even higher sexual satisfaction. [1, 2, 3, 4]

Religious Communities and Human Flourishing
Participation in religious services is associated with numerous aspects of human flourishing, including happiness and life satisfaction, mental and physical health, meaning and purpose, character and virtue, and close social relationships. Evidence for the effects of religious communities on these flourishing outcomes now comes from rigorous longitudinal study designs with extensive confounding control.

Religious upbringing linked to better health and well-being during early adulthood
Researchers found that people who attended weekly religious services or practiced daily prayer or meditation in their youth reported greater life satisfaction and positivity in their 20s—and were less likely to subsequently have depressive symptoms, smoke, use illicit drugs, or have a sexually transmitted infection—than people raised with less regular spiritual habits.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Maine Progressive

The war bow. God uses metaphors.
Feb 16, 2026
303
85
78
Bangor
✟11,448.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
You still think you are a judge of who is Christian and who isn't. You're failing in that endeavor.
Please, just read what I actually say. It's not fair to put words in my mouth that I do not say and do not believe. If I judge who is Christian at all, I judge that Southeastern Christians are every bit Christian as anyone else who claims to be a Christian. I am NOT saying who is or who isn't. I AM saying that many polls show that the percentage of those who CLAIM to be a Christian is 68% in the Southeast. (I did not make that judgement! They made that claim themselves to the pollsters.). That is much more than the rest of the U.S. Yet it is a fact that the more secular regions of the U.S. do a better job of reducing the named specific immoral conditions. Therefore, the claim that the country would be better if Christians were able to have more influence is demonstrated to be false by the example of the Southeast where Christians (in name or actuality) DO have more influence. Whatever you think is my endeavor is a delusion. My only endeavor is to hope Christians would take the opportunity to use their greater power and influence in the Southeast to set an example. They could, if they would. Does that mean Southeast Christians are less Christian? Not Christian? No. That's bologna. It only means that the claim that more Christian influence in this country would make things better...actually wouldn't.
 
Upvote 0

timothyu

Well-Known Member
Dec 31, 2018
25,999
9,573
up there
✟417,265.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
A limitless number of people attend churches without ever receiving the new birth.
Perhaps because building a church in the national image rather than of the Kingdom has created conflict because of the opposing values.
 
Upvote 0