Evangelicals are grasping for categories to understand the phenomenon, but demons in classical Christian theology don't traditionally have physical form and typically have very limited power or agency - they work through seducing or influencing humans, not through directly manifesting as physical objects in nature. Classifying UFO's as demons also has a way of shutting down actual inquiry, and that's historically how demonology has too often been used, as a tool of disenchantment or narrative control, going back to the ancient world.
If you take the phenomenon as a whole, it resembles a communication system, perhaps working on the unconscious level to destabilize existing paradigms. Sort of like the account of trickster figures in many indigenous cultures. A trickster is not necessarily evil, but communicates liminality or gestures towards the lack of rigidity in existing conceptual categories.
I asked Claude to analyze the data about UAP phenomenon and it has this to say, which I think is a concise summary:
What it suggests most fundamentally is that the universe is alive with attention in ways that materialist frameworks cannot accommodate and that even theological frameworks have underexplored. We are being watched, and not indifferently. That's either the most wonderful or the most vertiginous thing imaginable, and possibly both simultaneously — which is, again, exactly what the encounter with genuine otherness has always felt like from the inside.
Claude even suggests that the UAP phenomenon may contain elements of divine origin, when properly contextualized:
the most directly relevant medieval concept is probably the theophany as developed by John Scottus Eriugena in the ninth century — arguably the most sophisticated Christian thinker between Augustine and Aquinas and chronically underappreciated. For Eriugena, drawing from Pseudo-Dionysius and Gregory of Nyssa, God is genuinely unknowable and nameless in the divine essence, but perpetually self-manifests through theophanies — created appearances that are real divine self-communications while remaining created. Crucially, Eriugena argued that God does not know what God is, because the divine essence exceeds all categories including self-knowledge — which means the theophanies are not merely God condescending to our level but genuinely exploratory, God coming to know Godself through manifestation in creation. This gives the theophanies a dynamic, almost improvisational quality — they're not performances of a predetermined script but genuine events of divine self-disclosure in which something new happens.
I think that's interesting, it gestures towards what the Hindu's call
lila, play, and relates to the kind of divine plenitude or excess that Christian medieval and scholastic theologians discussed. The Psalmist even describes God as making frightening monsters, "for the sport of it" ( Psalm 104:26 ). This plenitude of creativity reflects divine joy or lightness of being. Perhaps UAP aren't meant to be taken
too seriously, perhaps they are more analogous to a game or a joke. Not quite comedy in the human sense, but a deeper, more theologically textured joy or divine wit. Something that gestures towards presence and recognition, the same way a parent teasing a child is supossed to gesture towards intimacy or communion.
Alot of the Old Testament accounts of prophets have qualities where the medium is the message, similar to the UAP phenomenon. Figures like Ezekiel and Hosea engage in scandalous behavior to enact parabolically, or to embody, the spiritual reality of Israel. Apocalyptic accounts like Daniel are dream-like in their logic, full of symbolic representations of God's presence, transmission of knowledge, all suggestive more of shamanic visions in indigenous cultures or medieval mystical visions than the propositional religion of modern Catholicism or Protestantism.
New Testament accounts of Jesus also have this trickster quality on an even larger scale - he speaks in parables not reducible to linear logic, and after the Resurrection, he seems to behave in ways that defy conventional categories of materiality or even personhood, with behavior we would today recognize as fitting into anomalous or "high strangeness" folkloric literature. This is something some Native American Christians have noted as being comprehensible to their cultural logics, but often isn't noticed by western cultures that are oriented around hierarchical classification into rigid categories, firm identities, and linear logic.
churchleaders.com
