Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I wonder what your definition of "agnostic" is? Meriam Webster says:Agnostics, I think they would have greater faith then most Christians.
I wonder what your definition of "agnostic" is? Meriam Webster says:
"a person who holds the view that any ultimate reality (such as a supreme being) is unknown and probably unknowable
broadly : one who is not committed to believing in either the existence or the nonexistence of God or any gods"
What is the "greater faith" in that you say they would have? How could they have faith in an unknown God?
Sorry its my grammar again. I meant to question the interpretation that the unseen and quiet Christians working in the background are agnostic. I was saying they are much more than agnostic. Rather they have the most faithful service. Thus being great Christians.I wonder what your definition of "agnostic" is? Meriam Webster says:
"a person who holds the view that any ultimate reality (such as a supreme being) is unknown and probably unknowable
broadly : one who is not committed to believing in either the existence or the nonexistence of God or any gods"
The greater faith would be that they lived the actual teachings. They were willing to lay down their lives, their possessions and everything for Christ.What is the "greater faith" in that you say they would have? How could they have faith in an unknown God?
That's a lot clearer, thanks very much for explaining!Sorry its my grammar again. I meant to question the interpretation that the unseen and quiet Christians working in the background are agnostic. I was saying they are much more than agnostic. Rather they have the most faithful service. Thus being great Christians.
The greater faith would be that they lived the actual teachings. They were willing to lay down their lives, their possessions and everything for Christ.
Imagine a church like this today. It would be radical don't you think. People may even say its a hippy comune lol. Or they are like the Amish.
But the simple truth of the teachings clearly says that these are the fruits of Christs church.
So if there was such a church that could never be held with any charge of hypocracy or not living what they preach. That they actually give up their worldly goods even suffering as a concequence. Obviously to the Christians its not surffering but an honor.
Don't you think that this would be radically different. Something the world has rarely seen.
If people are a mix of good and bad, then the idea of a divinity taking away the bad part of a person is the same as a supernatural lobotomy, with the resulting person not being the person that went into the process.A mixture of both good and bad? Depending on how you define "good" and "bad" that is.
I like to think that we all have some good in us, just in different amounts. I also like to think we have bad in us as well, or the ability to do things that are wrong. Something people call a "dark side."
Everyone has done at least 1 thing wrong in their lifetime.
People are like the color grey. We can do sin (like the Devil), and we can do righteousness (like Jesus). We have the ability to do both good and evil. But Jesus has to save us and make us be 100% good like he is with no bad nature at all. He will completely erase our dark sides and make us like the angels in Heaven.
That concept thrills me. The concept of being a totally good and moral person. I would love to be holy and 100% good like God is, but right now I still have my sin nature...
One day God will completely take away my sin. I am looking forward to it.![]()
How could they have faith in an unknown God?
But wouldn't that mean that all citizens of heaven have been lobotomized, since there's said to be no sin/evil in heaven, which certainly makes sense? Anyway, it's interesting to me that a classical theology I'm familiar with maintains that evil is a parasite, so to speak, something that doesn't add anything but that actually takes away or distracts from the good that God created His world in.If people are a mix of good and bad, then the idea of a divinity taking away the bad part of a person is the same as a supernatural lobotomy, with the resulting person not being the person that went into the process.
I don't think something can be more after taking away from it.
I have heard people claim that people in heaven will be happy about the ones they loved on earth who went to hell suffering for all eternity, since they have obtained gods sense of righteousness or something like that.But wouldn't that mean that all citizens of heaven have been lobotomized, since there's said to be no sin/evil in heaven, which certainly makes sense? Anyway, it's interesting to me that a classical theology I'm familiar with maintains that evil is a parasite, so to speak, something that doesn't add anything but that actually takes away or distracts from the good that God created His world in.
I didn't mention anything about hell and its citizens or about anyone being happy about their suffering. Sin is said to produce its own suffering, in fact. But in any case sin, itself, is not normal behavior, and God's purpose isn't to to keep His creation in its sin, since He didn't create us to sin, but to free us from slavery to it.I have heard people claim that people in heaven will be happy about the ones they loved on earth who went to hell suffering for all eternity, since they have obtained gods sense of righteousness or something like that.
Does that sound like normal behaviour to you? A father being aware that his daughter is burning for the rest of eternity and giving that a thumbs up of approval?
I know. It's just an example on why I think the concept many christians hold about heaven and hell sounds a bit iffy.I didn't mention anything about hell and its citizens or about anyone being happy about their suffering.
If one believes, as I do, that evil in itself is nothing; only a privation of the good then human beings on their own only have the ability to do evil.We have the ability to do both good and evil.
I have it heard it theorized that we will not remember those who go to hell.I have heard people claim that people in heaven will be happy about the ones they loved on earth who went to hell suffering for all eternity, since they have obtained gods sense of righteousness or something like that.
Does that sound like normal behaviour to you? A father being aware that his daughter is burning for the rest of eternity and giving that a thumbs up of approval?
I have it heard it theorized that we will not remember those who go to hell.
None of the options that people have thought up to solve this conundrum sound very attractive to me. Maybe it's because I'm unsaved and thus am not able to perceive them properly.Ahhh... God's version of abortion... only crueler.
Maybe it's because I'm unsaved and thus am not able to perceive them properly.
I don't know. But if we do remember them then we know that that knowledge will not detract from the joy of heaven.I have it heard it theorized that we will not remember those who go to hell.
If you have your memories erased, you won't be you. Imagine, say, your dad wasn't a real Christian. What would it mean for you to go through eternity not knowing/remembering your dad.I have it heard it theorized that we will not remember those who go to hell.