I appreciate that humans are steadfast in their religious understanding, and that many do not wish to discuss them in consideration of ALL that is written. And I too do not believe God makes mistakes. And therefore you are free to disregard my reply. And I wish you well also.
But for those reading along, it seems prudent to point out that the God, "of the Bible", who created the Holy Sabbaths, is said
to know the end from the beginning. And it is also taught in the same Holy Scriptures that the Jesus of the bible, "was slain from the foundation of the World". The implication that God didn't know men would disobey Him when HE created them, or that HE didn't know later, when HE created His Holy Sabbath "For man", that men would Sin and need Salvation, is certainly worthy of discernment or at least caution.
In like manner, the teaching that God didn't know that satan, who HE placed in the Garden, would deceive Eve when HE placed him there. And the teaching that when God created His Holy Sabbath "for man", HE didn't know Adam and Eve would need Mercy and Salvation, is just a bridge to far for me.
At the very least, these teachings are worthy of caution, which is in line with the instructions of Paul to "Beware of the Philosophies and traditions of men", spoken of in Col. 2, and also in line with Paul's instruction to "Prove all things" and "Test the spirits".
Lastly, it seems also prudent to point out that in Col. 2, Paul doesn't distinguish between the Sabbaths of God at all.
"
Let no man therefore judge you in meat, or in drink, or in respect of an holyday, or of the new moon, or of the sabbath days:
There are Holy Days that are not Sabbaths, like Passover, and 5 days of the 7 days of Unleavened bread. There are also "New Moons" that are neither Holy Days, nor Sabbaths. But all Sabbaths are Holy Days.
In like manner, God Himself didn't distinguish between His Holy Sabbaths in Lev. 23. Clearly combining His weekly Sabbath with the same importance as the First Day of Unleavened Bread. And all Expressed by God as follows.
Lev. 23:
1 And "the LORD spake" unto Moses, saying, (I believe this was the Christ, the Holy One of Israel)
2 Speak unto the children of Israel, and say unto them, Concerning the feasts "of the LORD", which ye shall proclaim to be holy convocations, even these are my feasts.
3 Six days shall work be done: but the seventh day is the sabbath of rest, an "holy convocation"; ye shall do no work therein: it is the sabbath of the LORD in all your dwellings.
4 These are the feasts of the LORD, even "holy convocations", which ye shall proclaim in their seasons.
6 And on the fifteenth day of the same month is the feast of unleavened bread unto the LORD: seven days ye must eat unleavened bread.
7 In the first day ye shall have an "holy convocation": ye shall do no servile work therein.
44 And Moses declared unto the children of Israel the "feasts of the LORD".
So as can be clearly seen, neither Paul nor God distinguished between the Sabbaths, nor did HE esteem one Sabbath Day above another.
And because Paul called them all "Shadows of things yet to Come", I find no evidence in Scriptures which contradicts Paul, to imply that "some" of God's Sabbaths are NOT shadows of things yet to come.
Given all the warnings about false teachings, philosophies of men, deceivers who come in Christ's Name, etc., it seems prudent to consider all these Inspired Words of God before adopting any philosophy.
And what better way to discern these things than to discuss among the brethren, what is actually written in scriptures?