• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

What is your theory, belief around Foreknowledge?

FutureAndAHope

Just me
Site Supporter
Aug 30, 2008
6,845
3,127
Australia
Visit site
✟903,319.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
As I mentioned in one of my other post I have been doing some more reading into the Early Church Fathers, and their views regarding Free Will / Predestination / and Foreknowledge. I paste my findings at the bottom of this post.

But basically they believed in Free Will, according to the principle that:

1Ti 2:3-6 For this is good and acceptable in the sight of God our Savior, who desires all men to be saved and to come to the knowledge of the truth. For there is one God and one Mediator between God and men, the Man Christ Jesus, who gave Himself a ransom for all​

They also believed in foreknowledge. But now to the meat of the topic, Free Will and foreknowledge are hard concepts to join together, without a "mysterious" element. Below I give a "possible" explanation of how it "might" work. I am interested to know what you think of foreknowledge.

My best guess, is that at the very initial point of creation God did not fully "know" how creation would play out. I say this because there is scripture that suggests "the LORD was sorry that He had made man on the earth". My theory is that God experienced all of His creation, seeing all of the choices made. Once all of this was completed, He could move back through time, like a "time traveller", and share the knowledge He had acquired. This is why some times in scripture God seems to "not know things", and in others makes strong declarations. Now this is just a wild guess, I don't say it is truth.

Gen 6:5-7 Then the LORD saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every intent of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually. And the LORD was sorry that He had made man on the earth, and He was grieved in His heart. So the LORD said, "I will destroy man whom I have created from the face of the earth, both man and beast, creeping thing and birds of the air, for I am sorry that I have made them."​


What did the Early Church Believe about Predestination

After reading some more Early Church Fathers, I can see two main points regarding the Predestination, Free Will argument.

  • The Early Church believed that God has foreknowledge, that He knows the future before it comes to pass.
  • That the Early Church believed that all people (all mankind) are extended a true offer of salvation
  • That man has free will, that God does not force man into salvation, or damnation, that man’s response to God determines their fate. That He (God) gives His good will to all people, because He loves all of those whom He created. That man’s free will is not altered by Foreknowledge.
Point One: God has foreknowledge

Irenaeus (A.D. 120-202)

Our God, one and the same, is also their God, who knows hidden things, who knoweth all things before they can come to pass; and for this reason has He said, “Jacob have I loved, but Esau have I hated.” – Irenaeus (A.D. 120-202), Against Heresies - Book 4 Ch 21

If, therefore, in the present time also, God, knowing the number of those who will not believe, since He foreknows all things, has given them over to unbelief, and turned away His face from men of this stamp, leaving them in the darkness which they have themselves chosen for themselves, what is there wonderful if He did also at that time give over to their unbelief, Pharaoh, who never would have believed, along with those who were with him? Irenaeus (A.D. 180) Ante-Nicene Fathers vol.1 pg. 502

Clement of Alexandria (A.D. 195)

He then avoids denying Christ through fear by reason of the command; nor does he sell his faith in the hope of the gifts prepared, but in love to the Lord he will most gladly depart from this life; perhaps giving thanks both to him who afforded the cause of his departure hence, and to him who laid the plot against him, for receiving an honorable reason which he himself furnished not, for showing what he is, to him by his patience, and to the Lord in love, by which even before his birth he was manifested to the Lord, who knew the martyr’s choice. Clement of Alexandria (A.D. 195) Ante-Nicene Fathers vol.2 pg.411

Point 2 and 3: People have free will, foreknowledge does not change it

Justin Martyr (110-165)

But lest some suppose, from what has been said by us, that we say that whatever happens, happens by a fatal necessity, because it is foretold as known beforehand, this too we explain. We have learned from the prophets, and we hold it to be true, that punishments, and chastisements, and good rewards, are rendered according to the merit of each man’s actions. Since if it be not so, but all things happen by fate, neither is anything at all in our own power. For if it be fated that this man, e.g., be good, and this other evil, neither is the former meritorious nor the latter to be blamed. And again, unless the human race have the power of avoiding evil and choosing good by free choice, they are not accountable for their actions, of whatever kind they be. But that it is by free choice they both walk uprightly and stumble, we thus demonstrate. We see the same man making a transition to opposite things. Now, if it had been fated that he were to be either good or bad, he could never have been capable of both the opposites, nor of so many transitions. But not even would some be good and others bad, since we thus make fate the cause of evil, and exhibit her as acting in opposition to herself; or that which has been already stated would seem to be true, that neither virtue nor vice is anything, but that things are only reckoned good or evil by opinion; which, as the true word shows, is the greatest impiety and wickedness. But this we assert is inevitable fate, that they who choose the good have worthy rewards, and they who choose the opposite have their merited awards. For not like other things, as trees and quadrupeds, which cannot act by choice, did God make man: for neither would he be worthy of reward or praise did he not of himself choose the good, but were created for this end; nor, if he were evil, would he be worthy of punishment, not being evil of himself, but being able to be nothing else than what he was made -Justin Martyr (110-165) First Apology - Ch 43)

I said briefly by anticipation, that God, wishing men and angels to follow His will, resolved to create them free to do righteousness; possessing reason, that they may know by whom they are created, and through whom they, not existing formerly, do now exist; and with a law that they should be judged by Him, if they do anything contrary to right reason: and of ourselves we, men and angels, shall be convicted of having acted sinfully, unless we repent beforehand. But if the word of God foretells that some angels and men shall be certainly punished, it did so because it foreknew that they would be unchangeably [wicked], but not because God had created them so. So that if they repent, all who wish for it can obtain mercy from God: and the Scripture foretells that they shall be blessed, saying, ‘Blessed is the man to whom the Lord imputeth not sin;’... - Justin Martyr(110-165) Dialoque with Trypho, Ch 141

Irenaeus (A.D. 120-202)

This expression [of our Lord], “How often would I have gathered thy children together, and thou wouldest not,” (Mat 23:37) set forth the ancient law of human liberty, because God made man a free [agent] from the beginning, possessing his own power, even as he does his own soul, to obey the behests (ad utendum sententia) of God voluntarily, and not by compulsion of God. For there is no coercion with God, but a good will [towards us] is present with Him continually. And therefore does He give good counsel to all. And in man, as well as in angels, He has placed the power of choice (for angels are rational beings), so that those who had yielded obedience might justly possess what is good, given indeed by God, but preserved by themselves. On the other hand, they who have not obeyed shall, with justice, be not found in possession of the good, and shall receive condign punishment: for God did kindly bestow on them what was good; but they themselves did not diligently keep it, nor deem it something precious, but poured contempt upon His super-eminent goodness. – Irenaeus (A.D. 120-202), Against Heresies - Book 4 Ch 37

Clement of Alexandria. (AD 195)

But the Lord, in His love to man, invites all men to the knowledge of the truth, and for this end sends the Paraclete. (Q 1)

Do not, however, faint. You may, if you choose, purchase salvation, though of inestimable value, with your own resources, love and living faith, which will be reckoned a suitable price. This recompense God cheerfully accepts; “for we trust in the living God, who is the Saviour of all men, especially of those who believe.” (Q 2)

Those men that draw near through fear, He converts. (Q 3)

But it has been God’s fixed and constant purpose to save the flock of men: for this end the good God sent the good Shepherd. And the Word, having unfolded the truth, showed to men the height of salvation, that either repenting they might be saved, or refusing to obey, they might be judged. This is the proclamation of righteousness: to those that obey, glad tidings; to those that disobey, judgment. (Q 4)

What, then, is the exhortation I give you? I urge you to be saved. This Christ desires. In one word. He freely bestows life on you. (Q 5)

to us who are obedient to the Word and masters of ourselves, who have believed, and are saved by voluntary choice, and are rationally, not irrationally, frightened by terror. (Q 6)

For the same who is Instructor is judge, and judges those who disobey Him; and the loving Word will not pass over their transgression in silence. He reproves, that they may repent. For “the Lord willeth the repentance of the sinner rather than his death.” (Q 7)

By the little grain, as it is figuratively called, He bestows salvation on all humanity abundantly. (Q8)

Tatian the Assyrian
This particular teacher was a disciple of Justin Martyr, as such adds clarity, to the belief held by him. It is said of Tatian that he did toward the end of his life bring some heresy, but I put this here to clarify how Justin Martyr taught about free choice, and fate. (Note I have not read all of Tatian).


The Logos, too, before the creation of men, was the Framer of angels. And each of these two orders of creatures was made free to act as it pleased, not having the nature of good, which again is with God alone, but is brought to perfection in men through their freedom of choice, in order that the bad man may be justly punished, having become depraved through his own fault, but the just man be deservedly praised for his virtuous deeds, since in the exercise of his free choice he refrained from transgressing the will of God. Such is the constitution of things in reference to angels and men. And the power of the Logos, having in itself a faculty to foresee future events, not as fated, but as taking place by the choice of free agents, foretold from time to time the issues of things to come; (Tatian 110-172 AD, Address to the Greeks Chapter 7)
 
Last edited:

Clare73

Blood-bought
Jun 12, 2012
29,563
7,611
North Carolina
✟357,391.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
As I mentioned in one of my other post I have been doing some more reading into the Early Church Fathers, and their views regarding Free Will / Predestination / and Foreknowledge. I paste my findings at the bottom of this post.

But basically they believed in Free Will, according to the principle that:

1Ti 2:3-6 For this is good and acceptable in the sight of God our Savior, who desires all men to be saved and to come to the knowledge of the truth. For there is one God and one Mediator between God and men, the Man Christ Jesus, who gave Himself a ransom for all​

They also believed in foreknowledge. But now to the meat of the topic, Free Will and foreknowledge are hard concepts to join together,
Foreknowledge (prognosis) is used only of divine foreknowledge in the NT, which is God knowing in advance what he is going to do. . .
because he has decreed that he shall do so.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

bling

Regular Member
Site Supporter
Feb 27, 2008
16,826
1,926
✟999,274.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
I’ll start with Gen 6:5-7 Then the LORD saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every intent of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually. And the LORD was sorry that He had made man on the earth, and He was grieved in His heart. So the LORD said, "I will destroy man whom I have created from the face of the earth, both man and beast, creeping thing and birds of the air, for I am sorry that I have made them."

God’s repenting is not like human repenting (if we could do it over, we would do something different), since God does the best that can be done every time. God personally out of empathy did not want Christ to go to the cross, but there was no other way.

The flood story tells us God will destroy this world someday.

We learn from the flood.

Now time:

It is extremely difficult for us to place ourselves “outside of time” since we are only in time.

God would know most of Joseph’s brothers wanted to get rid of him (do evil to him), but also some brothers would not murder their father’s son, so God providing an alternative to killing Joseph by them selling him into slavery in a far-off country. They’re even wanting to kill Joseph is a sin, but God would keep them from the actual act of killing Joseph.



God is not limited by time and we experimentally have shown over the last 100 years; time is relative.


Time has been shown experimentally over the last 100 years to be relative and no experiment has shown time to not be relative. God may have created time, but even if God did not, He still would not be limited by time, His relative time does not have to be controlled by our relative time.

Think about this: If I know a truly free will choice you made yesterday that choice is fixed and cannot be changed, since it is history and history cannot be changed (it happened). The fact I know your free will choice of yesterday does not keep it from being your free will choice.

Just because your free will choice tomorrow is fixed does not mean God is the one fixing it, since you are the one who fixed the choice by making the choice of your own free will.

History cannot be changed even if God was the only one to know about something that has happened, since it still happened it is history. Since God does everything right perfectly the first time, there is no reason to do it over again.

God is outside of time and omnipresent throughout time, so God at the end of time knows everything historically that has happened throughout time, making it unchangeable (fixed). Yet again just because God at the end of time knows all things that happened throughout time perfectly, does not mean human autonomous free will choices were not made and thus “fixed” by man making the choice.

God’s actions are also fixed and can be called foreordained or predestined.

God did not present this miraculous method of “how” He knows the future, but that is not unusual while communicating to man from man’s perspective is also God’s way.

With Peter, God at the end of time, this same God throughout time, knows what Peter and Christ chose to do with Christ being supplied the information by God of the end of time. Christ knowing the unrepentant state Peter was in can also realize His words will not keep Peter from sinning, but will help Peter to repent in the end, but it is still Peter’s choice.

There is another reason the Bible does not explain God’s time being even different from human time and thus presenting the idea of “time being relative”. If the Bible did say, “Time is relative”, then there would be scientific “proof” of the Biblical God, since the idea of time being relative comes up thousands of years later. The nonbeliever doe not need “knowledge” of the Biblical God, but faith in the Biblical God, so this knowledge is kept from us.

There are other ways God can know stuff, but He is outside of time, so He also knows everything historically throughout time?

God is very much interacting with humans, and He does the absolute best thing, so there is no reason for a do over.

Jesus knew when He was teaching His disciple, what He would be going through on the cross as pure history, but that does not mean He was on the cross constantly or it would not hurt him.
 
Upvote 0

FutureAndAHope

Just me
Site Supporter
Aug 30, 2008
6,845
3,127
Australia
Visit site
✟903,319.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Did a bit of Chat GPT, around time travel. Apparently time travel into the future is pretty much proven. So God, from the start of "when he created" could look into the future (if I understand correctly).

Time Travel to the Future: Theoretically Possible (and Already Proven)

  • Einstein's theory of relativity shows that time passes at different rates depending on how fast you're moving or how close you are to a strong gravitational field.
  • This effect is called time dilation.
Example:

  • Astronauts on the International Space Station age slightly slower than people on Earth due to their speed and the weaker gravity.
So yes—moving forward in time is absolutely real. We can do it with technology like fast-moving spacecraft or near black holes (though the effects are usually tiny unless you go really fast or really close to extreme gravity).

Time Travel to the Past: Theoretically Possible, But Highly Speculative

There are some theoretical models that suggest backward time travel could work, but none are proven or practical:

  1. Closed Timelike Curves (CTCs)
    Predicted by certain solutions to Einstein's equations (e.g., Gödel's universe, Tipler cylinders, or rotating black holes).
    • They involve paths in spacetime that loop back on themselves.
    • These are mathematically possible, but likely not physically realistic.
  2. Wormholes
    Hypothetical tunnels through spacetime, possibly connecting two different times.
    • Requires exotic matter with negative energy density to keep stable.
    • We’ve never observed such matter or wormholes.
  3. Quantum Mechanics & Retrocausality
    Some interpretations allow for effects to precede causes at a quantum scale—but this doesn’t extend to sending people or objects back in time.

⚠️ Major Issues & Paradoxes​

  • Causal paradoxes (e.g., grandfather paradox)
  • Information paradoxes (where something comes from nowhere)
  • Violations of entropy and the second law of thermodynamics
  • Many physicists believe these problems might make backward time travel impossible in practice.

Summary​

Type of Time TravelIs It Possible?Evidence/Support
To the future✅ YesProven via relativity
To the past❓ MaybeTheoretical only, no practical method
 
Upvote 0

Dan Perez

Well-Known Member
Dec 13, 2018
4,414
375
88
Arcadia
✟259,230.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
As I mentioned in one of my other post I have been doing some more reading into the Early Church Fathers, and their views regarding Free Will / Predestination / and Foreknowledge. I paste my findings at the bottom of this post.

But basically they believed in Free Will, according to the principle that:

1Ti 2:3-6 For this is good and acceptable in the sight of God our Savior, who desires all men to be saved and to come to the knowledge of the truth. For there is one God and one Mediator between God and men, the Man Christ Jesus, who gave Himself a ransom for all​

They also believed in foreknowledge. But now to the meat of the topic, Free Will and foreknowledge are hard concepts to join together, without a "mysterious" element. Below I give a "possible" explanation of how it "might" work. I am interested to know what you think of foreknowledge.

My best guess, is that at the very initial point of creation God did not fully "know" how creation would play out. I say this because there is scripture that suggests "the LORD was sorry that He had made man on the earth". My theory is that God experienced all of His creation, seeing all of the choices made. Once all of this was completed, He could move back through time, like a "time traveller", and share the knowledge He had acquired. This is why some times in scripture God seems to "not know things", and in others makes strong declarations. Now this is just a wild guess, I don't say it is truth.

Gen 6:5-7 Then the LORD saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every intent of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually. And the LORD was sorry that He had made man on the earth, and He was grieved in His heart. So the LORD said, "I will destroy man whom I have created from the face of the earth, both man and beast, creeping thing and birds of the air, for I am sorry that I have made them."​


What did the Early Church Believe about Predestination

After reading some more Early Church Fathers, I can see two main points regarding the Predestination, Free Will argument.

  • The Early Church believed that God has foreknowledge, that He knows the future before it comes to pass.
  • That the Early Church believed that all people (all mankind) are extended a true offer of salvation
  • That man has free will, that God does not force man into salvation, or damnation, that man’s response to God determines their fate. That He (God) gives His good will to all people, because He loves all of those whom He created. That man’s free will is not altered by Foreknowledge.
Point One: God has foreknowledge

Irenaeus (A.D. 120-202)

Our God, one and the same, is also their God, who knows hidden things, who knoweth all things before they can come to pass; and for this reason has He said, “Jacob have I loved, but Esau have I hated.” – Irenaeus (A.D. 120-202), Against Heresies - Book 4 Ch 21

If, therefore, in the present time also, God, knowing the number of those who will not believe, since He foreknows all things, has given them over to unbelief, and turned away His face from men of this stamp, leaving them in the darkness which they have themselves chosen for themselves, what is there wonderful if He did also at that time give over to their unbelief, Pharaoh, who never would have believed, along with those who were with him? Irenaeus (A.D. 180) Ante-Nicene Fathers vol.1 pg. 502

Clement of Alexandria (A.D. 195)

He then avoids denying Christ through fear by reason of the command; nor does he sell his faith in the hope of the gifts prepared, but in love to the Lord he will most gladly depart from this life; perhaps giving thanks both to him who afforded the cause of his departure hence, and to him who laid the plot against him, for receiving an honorable reason which he himself furnished not, for showing what he is, to him by his patience, and to the Lord in love, by which even before his birth he was manifested to the Lord, who knew the martyr’s choice. Clement of Alexandria (A.D. 195) Ante-Nicene Fathers vol.2 pg.411

Point 2 and 3: People have free will, foreknowledge does not change it

Justin Martyr (110-165)

But lest some suppose, from what has been said by us, that we say that whatever happens, happens by a fatal necessity, because it is foretold as known beforehand, this too we explain. We have learned from the prophets, and we hold it to be true, that punishments, and chastisements, and good rewards, are rendered according to the merit of each man’s actions. Since if it be not so, but all things happen by fate, neither is anything at all in our own power. For if it be fated that this man, e.g., be good, and this other evil, neither is the former meritorious nor the latter to be blamed. And again, unless the human race have the power of avoiding evil and choosing good by free choice, they are not accountable for their actions, of whatever kind they be. But that it is by free choice they both walk uprightly and stumble, we thus demonstrate. We see the same man making a transition to opposite things. Now, if it had been fated that he were to be either good or bad, he could never have been capable of both the opposites, nor of so many transitions. But not even would some be good and others bad, since we thus make fate the cause of evil, and exhibit her as acting in opposition to herself; or that which has been already stated would seem to be true, that neither virtue nor vice is anything, but that things are only reckoned good or evil by opinion; which, as the true word shows, is the greatest impiety and wickedness. But this we assert is inevitable fate, that they who choose the good have worthy rewards, and they who choose the opposite have their merited awards. For not like other things, as trees and quadrupeds, which cannot act by choice, did God make man: for neither would he be worthy of reward or praise did he not of himself choose the good, but were created for this end; nor, if he were evil, would he be worthy of punishment, not being evil of himself, but being able to be nothing else than what he was made -Justin Martyr (110-165) First Apology - Ch 43)

I said briefly by anticipation, that God, wishing men and angels to follow His will, resolved to create them free to do righteousness; possessing reason, that they may know by whom they are created, and through whom they, not existing formerly, do now exist; and with a law that they should be judged by Him, if they do anything contrary to right reason: and of ourselves we, men and angels, shall be convicted of having acted sinfully, unless we repent beforehand. But if the word of God foretells that some angels and men shall be certainly punished, it did so because it foreknew that they would be unchangeably [wicked], but not because God had created them so. So that if they repent, all who wish for it can obtain mercy from God: and the Scripture foretells that they shall be blessed, saying, ‘Blessed is the man to whom the Lord imputeth not sin;’... - Justin Martyr(110-165) Dialoque with Trypho, Ch 141

Irenaeus (A.D. 120-202)

This expression [of our Lord], “How often would I have gathered thy children together, and thou wouldest not,” (Mat 23:37) set forth the ancient law of human liberty, because God made man a free [agent] from the beginning, possessing his own power, even as he does his own soul, to obey the behests (ad utendum sententia) of God voluntarily, and not by compulsion of God. For there is no coercion with God, but a good will [towards us] is present with Him continually. And therefore does He give good counsel to all. And in man, as well as in angels, He has placed the power of choice (for angels are rational beings), so that those who had yielded obedience might justly possess what is good, given indeed by God, but preserved by themselves. On the other hand, they who have not obeyed shall, with justice, be not found in possession of the good, and shall receive condign punishment: for God did kindly bestow on them what was good; but they themselves did not diligently keep it, nor deem it something precious, but poured contempt upon His super-eminent goodness. – Irenaeus (A.D. 120-202), Against Heresies - Book 4 Ch 37

Clement of Alexandria. (AD 195)

But the Lord, in His love to man, invites all men to the knowledge of the truth, and for this end sends the Paraclete. (Q 1)

Do not, however, faint. You may, if you choose, purchase salvation, though of inestimable value, with your own resources, love and living faith, which will be reckoned a suitable price. This recompense God cheerfully accepts; “for we trust in the living God, who is the Saviour of all men, especially of those who believe.” (Q 2)

Those men that draw near through fear, He converts. (Q 3)

But it has been God’s fixed and constant purpose to save the flock of men: for this end the good God sent the good Shepherd. And the Word, having unfolded the truth, showed to men the height of salvation, that either repenting they might be saved, or refusing to obey, they might be judged. This is the proclamation of righteousness: to those that obey, glad tidings; to those that disobey, judgment. (Q 4)

What, then, is the exhortation I give you? I urge you to be saved. This Christ desires. In one word. He freely bestows life on you. (Q 5)

to us who are obedient to the Word and masters of ourselves, who have believed, and are saved by voluntary choice, and are rationally, not irrationally, frightened by terror. (Q 6)

For the same who is Instructor is judge, and judges those who disobey Him; and the loving Word will not pass over their transgression in silence. He reproves, that they may repent. For “the Lord willeth the repentance of the sinner rather than his death.” (Q 7)

By the little grain, as it is figuratively called, He bestows salvation on all humanity abundantly. (Q8)

Tatian the Assyrian
This particular teacher was a disciple of Justin Martyr, as such adds clarity, to the belief held by him. It is said of Tatian that he did toward the end of his life bring some heresy, but I put this here to clarify how Justin Martyr taught about free choice, and fate. (Note I have not read all of Tatian).


The Logos, too, before the creation of men, was the Framer of angels. And each of these two orders of creatures was made free to act as it pleased, not having the nature of good, which again is with God alone, but is brought to perfection in men through their freedom of choice, in order that the bad man may be justly punished, having become depraved through his own fault, but the just man be deservedly praised for his virtuous deeds, since in the exercise of his free choice he refrained from transgressing the will of God. Such is the constitution of things in reference to angels and men. And the power of the Logos, having in itself a faculty to foresee future events, not as fated, but as taking place by the choice of free agents, foretold from time to time the issues of things to come; (Tatian 110-172 AD, Address to the Greeks Chapter 7)
And PREDESTINATION is found in Eph 1:4-5 and in Rom 8:29 -30

And FOREKNOWLEDGE is found 1 Peter 1:2 and in Rom 8:29

Freewill is only FOUND once in. Gen 2:16-17 other wise there is no FREE. WILL. , PERIOD. !!
dan p
 
  • Like
Reactions: A New Dawn
Upvote 0

FutureAndAHope

Just me
Site Supporter
Aug 30, 2008
6,845
3,127
Australia
Visit site
✟903,319.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
And PREDESTINATION is found in Eph 1:4-5 and in Rom 8:29 -30

And FOREKNOWLEDGE is found 1 Peter 1:2 and in Rom 8:29

Freewill is only FOUND once in. Gen 2:16-17 other wise there is no FREE. WILL. , PERIOD. !!
dan p
Choices are found all throughout scripture. They are real choices, not mock ones. Choices have consequences. Take the following example from Job, it states that based on the person's choice, they either bring for themselves spiritual life, or spiritual death:

Job 36:9-12 Then He tells them their work and their transgressions—That they have acted defiantly. He also opens their ear to instruction, And commands that they turn from iniquity. If they obey and serve Him, They shall spend their days in prosperity, And their years in pleasures. But if they do not obey, They shall perish by the sword, And they shall die without knowledge.

Jesus extends the offer of Salvation to all, but our willingness, or lack of it, are important.

Mat 23:37 "O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, the one who kills the prophets and stones those who are sent to her! How often I wanted to gather your children together, as a hen gathers her chicks under her wings, but you were not willing!

Our choice or obedience is also important to receiving the Holy Spirit.

Joh 14:15-16 "If you love Me, keep My commandments. And I will pray the Father, and He will give you another Helper, that He may abide with you forever—

Joh 14:22-24 Judas (not Iscariot) said to Him, "Lord, how is it that You will manifest Yourself to us, and not to the world?" Jesus answered and said to him, "If anyone loves Me, he will keep My word; and My Father will love him, and We will come to him and make Our home with him. He who does not love Me does not keep My words; and the word which you hear is not Mine but the Father's who sent Me.

Note the order of receiving the Father's love (above) it comes only after we are obedient to God's word. There is an action we take in response to God's offer of salvation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bling
Upvote 0

A New Dawn

Bind my wandering heart to thee!
Site Supporter
Mar 18, 2004
71,229
7,970
Western New York
✟164,988.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Choices are found all throughout scripture. They are real choices, not mock ones. Choices have consequences. Take the following example from Job, it states that based on the person's choice, they either bring for themselves spiritual life, or spiritual death:

Job 36:9-12 Then He tells them their work and their transgressions—That they have acted defiantly. He also opens their ear to instruction, And commands that they turn from iniquity. If they obey and serve Him, They shall spend their days in prosperity, And their years in pleasures. But if they do not obey, They shall perish by the sword, And they shall die without knowledge.

Jesus extends the offer of Salvation to all, but our willingness, or lack of it, are important.

Mat 23:37 "O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, the one who kills the prophets and stones those who are sent to her! How often I wanted to gather your children together, as a hen gathers her chicks under her wings, but you were not willing!

Our choice or obedience is also important to receiving the Holy Spirit.

Joh 14:15-16 "If you love Me, keep My commandments. And I will pray the Father, and He will give you another Helper, that He may abide with you forever—

Joh 14:22-24 Judas (not Iscariot) said to Him, "Lord, how is it that You will manifest Yourself to us, and not to the world?" Jesus answered and said to him, "If anyone loves Me, he will keep My word; and My Father will love him, and We will come to him and make Our home with him. He who does not love Me does not keep My words; and the word which you hear is not Mine but the Father's who sent Me.

Note the order of receiving the Father's love (above) it comes only after we are obedient to God's word. There is an action we take in response to God's offer of salvation.
When God speaks of desiring that all would come to him and not wishing that any should die, those are scriptures showing the heart of God. That is a different thing from the plan of salvation that he put in place and elucidated in John 6.

The choices we make are not free as was Adam’s choice in the Garden of Eden because we have a fallen nature (thanks to Adam’s use of his free-will choice) and can only make choices from that fallen nature until the time comes when we are redeemed (and thus have a redeemed nature). Once we are redeemed and have the gift of the Holy Spirit to guide us, we can make free-will choices. While we are slaves to sin, we cannot make free-will choices. We can make choices, but they are not free-will. There are too many scriptures where this is made clear. Prior to being redeemed, men have evil thoughts all the time, we require a Savior.
 
Upvote 0

Clare73

Blood-bought
Jun 12, 2012
29,563
7,611
North Carolina
✟357,391.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
As I mentioned in one of my other post I have been doing some more reading into the Early Church Fathers, and their views regarding Free Will / Predestination / and Foreknowledge. I paste my findings at the bottom of this post.
But basically they believed in Free Will, according to the principle that:
1Ti 2:3-6 For this is good and acceptable in the sight of God our Savior, who desires all men to be saved and to come to the knowledge of the truth. For there is one God and one Mediator between God and men, the Man Christ Jesus, who gave Himself a ransom for all​
They also believed in foreknowledge.
In the NT, foreknowledge (prognosis) in relation to God is used only of God's foreknowledge of his own works.
But now to the meat of the topic, Free Will and foreknowledge are hard concepts to join together, without a "mysterious" element. Below I give a "possible" explanation of how it "might" work. I am interested to know what you think of foreknowledge.

My best guess, is that at the very initial point of creation God did not fully "know" how creation would play out. I say this because there is scripture that suggests "the LORD was sorry that He had made man on the earth". My theory is that God experienced all of His creation, seeing all of the choices made. Once all of this was completed, He could move back through time, like a "time traveller", and share the knowledge He had acquired. This is why some times in scripture God seems to "not know things", and in others makes strong declarations. Now this is just a wild guess, I don't say it is truth.

Gen 6:5-7 Then the LORD saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every intent of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually. And the LORD was sorry that He had made man on the earth, and He was grieved in His heart. So the LORD said, "I will destroy man whom I have created from the face of the earth, both man and beast, creeping thing and birds of the air, for I am sorry that I have made them."​


What did the Early Church Believe about Predestination

After reading some more Early Church Fathers, I can see two main points regarding the Predestination, Free Will argument.

  • The Early Church believed that God has foreknowledge, that He knows the future before it comes to pass.
  • That the Early Church believed that all people (all mankind) are extended a true offer of salvation
  • That man has free will, that God does not force man into salvation, or damnation, that man’s response to God determines their fate. That He (God) gives His good will to all people, because He loves all of those whom He created. That man’s free will is not altered by Foreknowledge.
Point One: God has foreknowledge

Irenaeus (A.D. 120-202)

Our God, one and the same, is also their God, who knows hidden things, who knoweth all things before they can come to pass; and for this reason has He said, “Jacob have I loved, but Esau have I hated.” – Irenaeus (A.D. 120-202), Against Heresies - Book 4 Ch 21

If, therefore, in the present time also, God, knowing the number of those who will not believe, since He foreknows all things, has given them over to unbelief, and turned away His face from men of this stamp, leaving them in the darkness which they have themselves chosen for themselves, what is there wonderful if He did also at that time give over to their unbelief, Pharaoh, who never would have believed, along with those who were with him? Irenaeus (A.D. 180) Ante-Nicene Fathers vol.1 pg. 502

Clement of Alexandria (A.D. 195)

He then avoids denying Christ through fear by reason of the command; nor does he sell his faith in the hope of the gifts prepared, but in love to the Lord he will most gladly depart from this life; perhaps giving thanks both to him who afforded the cause of his departure hence, and to him who laid the plot against him, for receiving an honorable reason which he himself furnished not, for showing what he is, to him by his patience, and to the Lord in love, by which even before his birth he was manifested to the Lord, who knew the martyr’s choice. Clement of Alexandria (A.D. 195) Ante-Nicene Fathers vol.2 pg.411

Point 2 and 3: People have free will, foreknowledge does not change it

Justin Martyr (110-165)

But lest some suppose, from what has been said by us, that we say that whatever happens, happens by a fatal necessity, because it is foretold as known beforehand, this too we explain. We have learned from the prophets, and we hold it to be true, that punishments, and chastisements, and good rewards, are rendered according to the merit of each man’s actions. Since if it be not so, but all things happen by fate, neither is anything at all in our own power. For if it be fated that this man, e.g., be good, and this other evil, neither is the former meritorious nor the latter to be blamed. And again, unless the human race have the power of avoiding evil and choosing good by free choice, they are not accountable for their actions, of whatever kind they be. But that it is by free choice they both walk uprightly and stumble, we thus demonstrate. We see the same man making a transition to opposite things. Now, if it had been fated that he were to be either good or bad, he could never have been capable of both the opposites, nor of so many transitions. But not even would some be good and others bad, since we thus make fate the cause of evil, and exhibit her as acting in opposition to herself; or that which has been already stated would seem to be true, that neither virtue nor vice is anything, but that things are only reckoned good or evil by opinion; which, as the true word shows, is the greatest impiety and wickedness. But this we assert is inevitable fate, that they who choose the good have worthy rewards, and they who choose the opposite have their merited awards. For not like other things, as trees and quadrupeds, which cannot act by choice, did God make man: for neither would he be worthy of reward or praise did he not of himself choose the good, but were created for this end; nor, if he were evil, would he be worthy of punishment, not being evil of himself, but being able to be nothing else than what he was made -Justin Martyr (110-165) First Apology - Ch 43)

I said briefly by anticipation, that God, wishing men and angels to follow His will, resolved to create them free to do righteousness; possessing reason, that they may know by whom they are created, and through whom they, not existing formerly, do now exist; and with a law that they should be judged by Him, if they do anything contrary to right reason: and of ourselves we, men and angels, shall be convicted of having acted sinfully, unless we repent beforehand. But if the word of God foretells that some angels and men shall be certainly punished, it did so because it foreknew that they would be unchangeably [wicked], but not because God had created them so. So that if they repent, all who wish for it can obtain mercy from God: and the Scripture foretells that they shall be blessed, saying, ‘Blessed is the man to whom the Lord imputeth not sin;’... - Justin Martyr(110-165) Dialoque with Trypho, Ch 141

Irenaeus (A.D. 120-202)

This expression [of our Lord], “How often would I have gathered thy children together, and thou wouldest not,” (Mat 23:37) set forth the ancient law of human liberty, because God made man a free [agent] from the beginning, possessing his own power, even as he does his own soul, to obey the behests (ad utendum sententia) of God voluntarily, and not by compulsion of God. For there is no coercion with God, but a good will [towards us] is present with Him continually. And therefore does He give good counsel to all. And in man, as well as in angels, He has placed the power of choice (for angels are rational beings), so that those who had yielded obedience might justly possess what is good, given indeed by God, but preserved by themselves. On the other hand, they who have not obeyed shall, with justice, be not found in possession of the good, and shall receive condign punishment: for God did kindly bestow on them what was good; but they themselves did not diligently keep it, nor deem it something precious, but poured contempt upon His super-eminent goodness. – Irenaeus (A.D. 120-202), Against Heresies - Book 4 Ch 37

Clement of Alexandria. (AD 195)

But the Lord, in His love to man, invites all men to the knowledge of the truth, and for this end sends the Paraclete. (Q 1)

Do not, however, faint. You may, if you choose, purchase salvation, though of inestimable value, with your own resources, love and living faith, which will be reckoned a suitable price. This recompense God cheerfully accepts; “for we trust in the living God, who is the Saviour of all men, especially of those who believe.” (Q 2)

Those men that draw near through fear, He converts. (Q 3)

But it has been God’s fixed and constant purpose to save the flock of men: for this end the good God sent the good Shepherd. And the Word, having unfolded the truth, showed to men the height of salvation, that either repenting they might be saved, or refusing to obey, they might be judged. This is the proclamation of righteousness: to those that obey, glad tidings; to those that disobey, judgment. (Q 4)

What, then, is the exhortation I give you? I urge you to be saved. This Christ desires. In one word. He freely bestows life on you. (Q 5)

to us who are obedient to the Word and masters of ourselves, who have believed, and are saved by voluntary choice, and are rationally, not irrationally, frightened by terror. (Q 6)

For the same who is Instructor is judge, and judges those who disobey Him; and the loving Word will not pass over their transgression in silence. He reproves, that they may repent. For “the Lord willeth the repentance of the sinner rather than his death.” (Q 7)

By the little grain, as it is figuratively called, He bestows salvation on all humanity abundantly. (Q8)

Tatian the Assyrian
This particular teacher was a disciple of Justin Martyr, as such adds clarity, to the belief held by him. It is said of Tatian that he did toward the end of his life bring some heresy, but I put this here to clarify how Justin Martyr taught about free choice, and fate. (Note I have not read all of Tatian).


The Logos, too, before the creation of men, was the Framer of angels. And each of these two orders of creatures was made free to act as it pleased, not having the nature of good, which again is with God alone, but is brought to perfection in men through their freedom of choice, in order that the bad man may be justly punished, having become depraved through his own fault, but the just man be deservedly praised for his virtuous deeds, since in the exercise of his free choice he refrained from transgressing the will of God. Such is the constitution of things in reference to angels and men. And the power of the Logos, having in itself a faculty to foresee future events, not as fated, but as taking place by the choice of free agents, foretold from time to time the issues of things to come; (Tatian 110-172 AD, Address to the Greeks Chapter 7)
 
Upvote 0

bling

Regular Member
Site Supporter
Feb 27, 2008
16,826
1,926
✟999,274.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
When God speaks of desiring that all would come to him and not wishing that any should die, those are scriptures showing the heart of God. That is a different thing from the plan of salvation that he put in place and elucidated in John 6.

The choices we make are not free as was Adam’s choice in the Garden of Eden because we have a fallen nature (thanks to Adam’s use of his free-will choice) and can only make choices from that fallen nature until the time comes when we are redeemed (and thus have a redeemed nature). Once we are redeemed and have the gift of the Holy Spirit to guide us, we can make free-will choices. While we are slaves to sin, we cannot make free-will choices. We can make choices, but they are not free-will. There are too many scriptures where this is made clear. Prior to being redeemed, men have evil thoughts all the time, we require a Savior.
Adam and Eve sinned with the free will nature they had and only one way to sin, so why would we not also sin with a free will nature and a ton of ways to sin (given through the knowledge of good and evil)? Why do we have to "fall" to being less of a human than Adam and Eve?
 
Upvote 0

A New Dawn

Bind my wandering heart to thee!
Site Supporter
Mar 18, 2004
71,229
7,970
Western New York
✟164,988.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Adam and Eve sinned with the free will nature they had and only one way to sin, so why would we not also sin with a free will nature and a ton of ways to sin (given through the knowledge of good and evil)? Why do we have to "fall" to being less of a human than Adam and Eve?
Adam did not have a fallen nature when he fell. We are fallen now because he chose to rebel against God then.
 
Upvote 0

bling

Regular Member
Site Supporter
Feb 27, 2008
16,826
1,926
✟999,274.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Adam did not have a fallen nature when he fell. We are fallen now because he chose to rebel against God then.
We have "knowledge of Good and Evil" which provides tons of ways to sin, so is that what you consider to be the "fallen nature"?
 
Upvote 0

A New Dawn

Bind my wandering heart to thee!
Site Supporter
Mar 18, 2004
71,229
7,970
Western New York
✟164,988.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
We have "knowledge of Good and Evil" which provides tons of ways to sin, so is that what you consider to be the "fallen nature"?
I guess that would be part of it, but a bigger part is that we are not walking in communion with God. We are separated from Him, we don’t seek Him, only evil thoughts proceed from our hearts. Until He deigns to save us, whereupon he replaces our heart of stone and gives us a heart of flesh, and changes our nature from fallen to redeemed and gives us the gift of the Holy Spirit to help conform us to the image of Christ.
 
Upvote 0

bling

Regular Member
Site Supporter
Feb 27, 2008
16,826
1,926
✟999,274.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
I guess that would be part of it, but a bigger part is that we are not walking in communion with God. We are separated from Him, we don’t seek Him, only evil thoughts proceed from our hearts. Until He deigns to save us, whereupon he replaces our heart of stone and gives us a heart of flesh, and changes our nature from fallen to redeemed and gives us the gift of the Holy Spirit to help conform us to the image of Christ.
First off: Does that happen with our birth or after we sin, since it happened with Adam and Eve after they first sinned?
I agree we cannot, on our own do anything holy, righteous, worthy or honorable, but can we for purely selfish reasons (a sinful reason) willing accept God's pure undeserving charity as pure undeserved charity?
 
Upvote 0

A New Dawn

Bind my wandering heart to thee!
Site Supporter
Mar 18, 2004
71,229
7,970
Western New York
✟164,988.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
First off: Does that happen with our birth or after we sin, since it happened with Adam and Eve after they first sinned?
I agree we cannot, on our own do anything holy, righteous, worthy or honorable, but can we for purely selfish reasons (a sinful reason) willing accept God's pure undeserving charity as pure undeserved charity?
It happened as a result of Adam’s sin, when they were kicked out of the Garden of Eden. We are born into a fallen world. When Adam sinned, not just mankind, but everything in the world fell. Nature, the animals, everything fell. In Psalms, David stated it like this.

Psalm 51:5 (NASB95) Behold, I was brought forth in iniquity, And in sin my mother conceived me.

Many people see the flood as a baptism of the earth, and the confirmation by fire in the great tribulation will make the earth new again. I am not sure if I necessarily agree with that interpretation, but it shows how the earth needs to be cleansed also.
 
Upvote 0

bling

Regular Member
Site Supporter
Feb 27, 2008
16,826
1,926
✟999,274.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
It happened as a result of Adam’s sin, when they were kicked out of the Garden of Eden. We are born into a fallen world. When Adam sinned, not just mankind, but everything in the world fell. Nature, the animals, everything fell. In Psalms, David stated it like this.

Psalm 51:5 (NASB95) Behold, I was brought forth in iniquity, And in sin my mother conceived me.

Many people see the flood as a baptism of the earth, and the confirmation by fire in the great tribulation will make the earth new again. I am not sure if I necessarily agree with that interpretation, but it shows how the earth needs to be cleansed also.
I have taken a lot of my research on this subject from Jewish Scholars (Some being Messianic Scholars) and especially some individuals I corresponded with in Jerusalem who had access to untranslated Hebrew writings.

The Jews are mostly wanting to understand why Jesse and David’s brothers treated him so poorly.

Psalms 51:5 is a problem translation for Jews and Christians, so this one verse takes a lot of explaining, but it also has to be consistent with all these verse in Psalms at least.

It has been decades since I did my study and I have many pages of notes.

This could all be a very poetic hyperbole David is using and he should be allowed some poetic license.

We have similar verses:

Psalms 58:3 The wicked are estranged from the womb: they go astray as soon as they be born, speaking lies.

Ps 22 Yet you are he who took me from the womb; you made me trust you at my mother's breasts.

On you was I cast from my birth, and from my mother's womb you have been my God.

Ps. 139: 13 For you created my inmost being; you knit me together in my mother’s womb. 14

I praise you because I am fearfully and wonderfully made; your works are wonderful, I know that full well.



I argue that a child is Innocent:

Spiritual consequences of sin cannot be transmitted from father to son but only falls on the one who committed the act: Ezek 18:1-4; 18-20; Jer 32:29-30

Sin is committed by individually breaking God's law: 1 Jn 3:4

The spoken and written gospel message is God's power for salvation: Rom 1:16; 1 Cor. 1:18

God said that the king of Tyrus was "blameless in your ways from the day you were created, until unrighteousness was found in you." Ezek 28:15

"God made men upright but they sought devices" Eccl 7:29 (plural can't refer only to Adam)

Jer 19:2-6 human sacrifices of children to Baal is called the "blood of the innocent"

Jesus teaches us that we must become as little children to enter the kingdom of God (Matt. 18:3- 4; Lk. 18:16-17)

Apostle Paul: Rom 7:9-11 "Once alive" "sin killed me"

Psalms 58:3 The wicked are estranged from the womb: they go astray as soon as they be born, speaking lies.

Ps 22 Yet you are he who took me from the womb; you made me trust you at my mother's breasts.

On you was I cast from my birth, and from my mother's womb you have been my God.

Ps. 139: 13 For you created my inmost being; you knit me together in my mother’s womb. 14

I praise you because I am fearfully and wonderfully made; your works are wonderful, I know that full well.



Looking Deeper into Psalms 51:5

This is a Hebrew poetic parallelism, with the second line of the verse saying the same thing as the first line in a slightly different way. The first verb, of which David is the subject, is in the Pulal tense (as is "made" in # Job 15:7 ), which is an idiom used to refer to creation or origins, and is the 'passive' form of Polel ("formed": # Ps 90:2 Pro 26:10 ). TWOT, #623, 1:270.

The subject is, as the verse clearly states, the 'circumstances' of his conception- the sexual union which produced him was an act of sin, and addresses the unrighteousness of his mother's act.

Read some of the English translation Psalms 51:5

KJV Behold, I was shapen in iniquity; and in sin did my mother conceive me.

YLT Lo, in iniquity I have been brought forth, And in sin doth my mother conceive me.

WEB Behold, I was born in iniquity. My mother conceived me in sin

RSV Behold, I was brought forth in iniquity, and in sin did my mother conceive me.

KJV Behold, I was brought forth in iniquity, And in sin my mother conceived me.

Granted some translators have a problem with the sin being David’s mother’s problem and will point to verses like these:

In PS 116:16, David refers to himself as "the son of thy handmaid", which would seem to testify to his mother's positive relationship with the Lord.

Psalm 86:16 Turn to me and have mercy on me; show your strength in behalf of your servant; save me, because I serve you just as my mother did. She sounds righteous to me.

Thus, they majorly change the translation to be David’s sin, But are these translations the result of preconceived ideas?

The wording seems to be saying: the sin is the mothers at conception.

What do we know which could show it to be David’s mother and a problem?

David had two half-sisters (Zeruiah, Abigail)…..:

1CHR 2:13-16 13 “And Jesse begat his firstborn Eliab, and Abinadab the second, and Shimma the third, 14 Nethaneel the fourth, Raddai the fifth, 15 Ozem the sixth, David the seventh: 16 Whose sisters were Zeruiah, and Abigail. And the sons of Zeruiah; Abishai, and Joab, and Asahel, three. 17 And Abigail bare Amasa: and the father of Amasa was Jether the Ishmeelite.”

Again the translators do not like the idea of these sisters only being David’s so the change the wording and meaning, but the better translations is:

KJV Whose sisters were Zeruiah, and Abigail. And the sons of Zeruiah; Abishai, and Joab, and Asahel, three.

Why might these two only be David’s sisters and not Jesse’s daughters: 2Sam 17:25 “And Absalom made Amasa captain of the host instead of Joab: which Amasa was a man’s son, whose name was Ithra an Israelite, that went in to Abigail the daughter of Nahash, sister to Zeruiah Joab’s mother.”

Nahash is king of the Ammonites.

1 Chronicles 19:2 David thought, “I will show kindness to Hanun son of Nahash, because his father showed kindness to me.” So David sent a delegation to express his sympathy to Hanun concerning his father. When David’s envoys came to Hanun in the land of the Ammonites to express sympathy to him,

Why did Nahash show kindness to David?

David’s Jewish mother seems to have been previously married to Nahash the Ammonite and later was the second wife of Jesse, this was not a “sin” most likely but later could have been perceived as a sin, thus Jesse not counting David as one of his sons and all his brothers treating him badly.

A lot more can be said, but it was not David being conceived a sinner, but his mother conceiving him could be perceived as a sin.

Now we can go further into scripture showing how David was treated and persecuted as an outsider by his family and loved only by his mother.
 
Upvote 0

A New Dawn

Bind my wandering heart to thee!
Site Supporter
Mar 18, 2004
71,229
7,970
Western New York
✟164,988.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
I have taken a lot of my research on this subject from Jewish Scholars (Some being Messianic Scholars) and especially some individuals I corresponded with in Jerusalem who had access to untranslated Hebrew writings.

The Jews are mostly wanting to understand why Jesse and David’s brothers treated him so poorly.

Psalms 51:5 is a problem translation for Jews and Christians, so this one verse takes a lot of explaining, but it also has to be consistent with all these verse in Psalms at least.

It has been decades since I did my study and I have many pages of notes.

This could all be a very poetic hyperbole David is using and he should be allowed some poetic license.

We have similar verses:

Psalms 58:3 The wicked are estranged from the womb: they go astray as soon as they be born, speaking lies.

Ps 22 Yet you are he who took me from the womb; you made me trust you at my mother's breasts.

On you was I cast from my birth, and from my mother's womb you have been my God.

Ps. 139: 13 For you created my inmost being; you knit me together in my mother’s womb. 14

I praise you because I am fearfully and wonderfully made; your works are wonderful, I know that full well.



I argue that a child is Innocent:

Spiritual consequences of sin cannot be transmitted from father to son but only falls on the one who committed the act: Ezek 18:1-4; 18-20; Jer 32:29-30

Sin is committed by individually breaking God's law: 1 Jn 3:4

The spoken and written gospel message is God's power for salvation: Rom 1:16; 1 Cor. 1:18

God said that the king of Tyrus was "blameless in your ways from the day you were created, until unrighteousness was found in you." Ezek 28:15

"God made men upright but they sought devices" Eccl 7:29 (plural can't refer only to Adam)

Jer 19:2-6 human sacrifices of children to Baal is called the "blood of the innocent"

Jesus teaches us that we must become as little children to enter the kingdom of God (Matt. 18:3- 4; Lk. 18:16-17)

Apostle Paul: Rom 7:9-11 "Once alive" "sin killed me"

Psalms 58:3 The wicked are estranged from the womb: they go astray as soon as they be born, speaking lies.

Ps 22 Yet you are he who took me from the womb; you made me trust you at my mother's breasts.

On you was I cast from my birth, and from my mother's womb you have been my God.

Ps. 139: 13 For you created my inmost being; you knit me together in my mother’s womb. 14

I praise you because I am fearfully and wonderfully made; your works are wonderful, I know that full well.



Looking Deeper into Psalms 51:5

This is a Hebrew poetic parallelism, with the second line of the verse saying the same thing as the first line in a slightly different way. The first verb, of which David is the subject, is in the Pulal tense (as is "made" in # Job 15:7 ), which is an idiom used to refer to creation or origins, and is the 'passive' form of Polel ("formed": # Ps 90:2 Pro 26:10 ). TWOT, #623, 1:270.

The subject is, as the verse clearly states, the 'circumstances' of his conception- the sexual union which produced him was an act of sin, and addresses the unrighteousness of his mother's act.

Read some of the English translation Psalms 51:5

KJV Behold, I was shapen in iniquity; and in sin did my mother conceive me.

YLT Lo, in iniquity I have been brought forth, And in sin doth my mother conceive me.

WEB Behold, I was born in iniquity. My mother conceived me in sin

RSV Behold, I was brought forth in iniquity, and in sin did my mother conceive me.

KJV Behold, I was brought forth in iniquity, And in sin my mother conceived me.

Granted some translators have a problem with the sin being David’s mother’s problem and will point to verses like these:

In PS 116:16, David refers to himself as "the son of thy handmaid", which would seem to testify to his mother's positive relationship with the Lord.

Psalm 86:16 Turn to me and have mercy on me; show your strength in behalf of your servant; save me, because I serve you just as my mother did. She sounds righteous to me.

Thus, they majorly change the translation to be David’s sin, But are these translations the result of preconceived ideas?

The wording seems to be saying: the sin is the mothers at conception.

What do we know which could show it to be David’s mother and a problem?

David had two half-sisters (Zeruiah, Abigail)…..:

1CHR 2:13-16 13 “And Jesse begat his firstborn Eliab, and Abinadab the second, and Shimma the third, 14 Nethaneel the fourth, Raddai the fifth, 15 Ozem the sixth, David the seventh: 16 Whose sisters were Zeruiah, and Abigail. And the sons of Zeruiah; Abishai, and Joab, and Asahel, three. 17 And Abigail bare Amasa: and the father of Amasa was Jether the Ishmeelite.”

Again the translators do not like the idea of these sisters only being David’s so the change the wording and meaning, but the better translations is:

KJV Whose sisters were Zeruiah, and Abigail. And the sons of Zeruiah; Abishai, and Joab, and Asahel, three.

Why might these two only be David’s sisters and not Jesse’s daughters: 2Sam 17:25 “And Absalom made Amasa captain of the host instead of Joab: which Amasa was a man’s son, whose name was Ithra an Israelite, that went in to Abigail the daughter of Nahash, sister to Zeruiah Joab’s mother.”

Nahash is king of the Ammonites.

1 Chronicles 19:2 David thought, “I will show kindness to Hanun son of Nahash, because his father showed kindness to me.” So David sent a delegation to express his sympathy to Hanun concerning his father. When David’s envoys came to Hanun in the land of the Ammonites to express sympathy to him,

Why did Nahash show kindness to David?

David’s Jewish mother seems to have been previously married to Nahash the Ammonite and later was the second wife of Jesse, this was not a “sin” most likely but later could have been perceived as a sin, thus Jesse not counting David as one of his sons and all his brothers treating him badly.

A lot more can be said, but it was not David being conceived a sinner, but his mother conceiving him could be perceived as a sin.

Now we can go further into scripture showing how David was treated and persecuted as an outsider by his family and loved only by his mother.
OR it could mean what it says in relation to a fallen world.

I am not sure why people assume when we talk about a fallen world that we are talking about being responsible for Adam’s sin. We are not talking about that at all. We are responsible only for our own sin, the only thing Adam has to do with the conversation is that he is responsible for sin being in the world. He paid for his sin, but that doesn’t change the fact that sin is now in the world and we all must be responsible for the sin we commit.

To better understand the concept of the fall, there is the Genesis 3 passage and Romans 5 and 1 Corinthians 15 that speaks to how that event impacted the world.

The Bible is silent on the state of babies, so I am not going to go out on a limb on this, BUT we need to remember that they are also born into a fallen world. And a child doesn’t stay a baby for long.
 
Upvote 0

bling

Regular Member
Site Supporter
Feb 27, 2008
16,826
1,926
✟999,274.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
OR it could mean what it says in relation to a fallen world.

I am not sure why people assume when we talk about a fallen world that we are talking about being responsible for Adam’s sin. We are not talking about that at all. We are responsible only for our own sin, the only thing Adam has to do with the conversation is that he is responsible for sin being in the world. He paid for his sin, but that doesn’t change the fact that sin is now in the world and we all must be responsible for the sin we commit.

To better understand the concept of the fall, there is the Genesis 3 passage and Romans 5 and 1 Corinthians 15 that speaks to how that event impacted the world.

The Bible is silent on the state of babies, so I am not going to go out on a limb on this, BUT we need to remember that they are also born into a fallen world. And a child doesn’t stay a baby for long.
God defines what is sin and not sin and provides that knowledge to man. For Adam and Eve, it was not a sin to: lust, covet, avoid seeking wise council, Eve not helping Adam and really do or think anything other than physically eatting the fruit of the tree of knowledge. "Knowledge" of Good and Evil made all these sins without having make the world into a "fallen" world.
 
Upvote 0

A New Dawn

Bind my wandering heart to thee!
Site Supporter
Mar 18, 2004
71,229
7,970
Western New York
✟164,988.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
God defines what is sin and not sin and provides that knowledge to man. For Adam and Eve, it was not a sin to: lust, covet, avoid seeking wise council, Eve not helping Adam and really do or think anything other than physically eatting the fruit of the tree of knowledge. "Knowledge" of Good and Evil made all these sins without having make the world into a "fallen" world.
Firstly, lust wouldn’t have been a sin for Adam and Eve in the garden because there were no others to lust after. There was only one commandment given, so only one sin that could be performed.

Secondly, eating from the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil was a sin because God told them not to do it, so Adam sinned even before there was knowledge of good and evil.

Thirdly, why are you arguing against what the Bible reveals about the world being fallen? It is a clear belief for ALL of Christianity that when Adam fell, the world fell. There are scriptures in the OT as well as the NT that speak directly to this phenomenon. Why do you think a man needs to be saved if he isn’t fallen?
 
Upvote 0

bling

Regular Member
Site Supporter
Feb 27, 2008
16,826
1,926
✟999,274.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Firstly, lust wouldn’t have been a sin for Adam and Eve in the garden because there were no others to lust after. There was only one commandment given, so only one sin that could be performed.

Secondly, eating from the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil was a sin because God told them not to do it, so Adam sinned even before there was knowledge of good and evil.

Thirdly, why are you arguing against what the Bible reveals about the world being fallen? It is a clear belief for ALL of Christianity that when Adam fell, the world fell. There are scriptures in the OT as well as the NT that speak directly to this phenomenon. Why do you think a man needs to be saved if he isn’t fallen?
Eve lusted after the fruit. You can lust after a car.
Yes, eatting the fruit was the one and only way they could sin, full knowledge of good and evil provides ton of ways to sin without God making a list.
The Bible does not call it a "Fall". When my children first sinned, I did not think: "They fell from grace", but they transitioned into a maturer part of their life.
I do not think babies need to be "saved", but are in a safe condition prior to their sinning.
 
Upvote 0