Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Yeah, she was. She was defying the Capitol police and part of a mob attacking and breaking into the Capitol for the purpose of stopping the certification of the election.She is not and she was not a criminal.
Not all officers carried guns. Security officers who manned screening checkpoints do not carry guns. The mob outnumbered the police and security staff. I am still surprised that the officers did not shoot more.Then why didn't those officers guarding the doors open fire? Why did they move out of the way?
There was a tactical team coming up with the crowd. They weren't aloneMy assumption is that they would have been torn to pieces by the mob (minus 7 or 8 dead ones) since they were on the wrong side of that door to be safe.
The tactical team that was there were all armedNot all officers carried guns. Security officers who manned screening checkpoints do not carry guns. The mob outnumbered the police and security staff. I am still surprised that the officers did not shoot more.
The tactical team with the mob? Oathkeepers and Proud boys?The tactical team that was there were all armed
Byrd was not part of the tactical team.The tactical team with the mob? Oathkeepers and Proud boys?
Yes, there was a tactical team on the side of the Capitol police. One used his gun when the mob as breaking into the area where congress was.
Your point?
Let me get this right. Your response as to exactly when someone should have used deadly force is 'other officers didn't shoot, so no-one should have.'Then why didn't those officers guarding the doors open fire? Why did they move out of the way?
Other officers facing a greater threat chose not to use deadly force.Let me get this right. Your response as to exactly when someone should have used deadly force is 'other officers didn't shoot, so no-one should have.'
That can't be what you meant because it's a really stupid argument. So maybe you should try to be clearer.
Apart from the dumb 'Hey, these other guys didn't shoot,' you have avoided the question. At what point to you take drastic action when the mob is breaking down the last door between them and members of Congress?Other officers facing a greater threat chose not to use deadly force.
No, I said that didn't preclude Byrd from using deadly force.Apart from the dumb 'Hey, these other guys didn't shoot,' you have avoided the question. At what point to you take drastic action when the mob is breaking down the last door between them and members of Congress?
You're still avoiding the question. As the mob is literally breaking through the door, at what point do you take drastic action? Do you stand there as they all flood through heading for the Congressmen and women? I've already told you my position. The first one through the door is the first one I shoot. As opposed to...what? Do you run away and hide? Break for a coffee? Engage in a bit of push and shove with a few dozen hyped up morons?No, I said that didn't preclude Byrd from using deadly force.
It just wasn't necessary.
There was a tactical team there in seconds after Babbitt was shot,
At the time, there was one person who was climbing through a window. The other people saw the gun and backed off.You're still avoiding the question. As the mob is literally breaking through the door, at what point do you take drastic action? Do you stand there as they all flood through heading for the Congressmen and women? I've already told you my position. The first one through the door is the first one I shoot. As opposed to...what? Do you run away and hide? Break for a coffee? Engage in a bit of push and shove with a few dozen hyped up morons?
Whoops. You took too long to decide You're already being beaten by the mob and you've failed in your duty to protect those now in extreme danger.
Killing Trump supporters? Well, yeah. Of course I support that. Anyone who voted for him has only themselves to blame if they get shot. Oh, that is if they have also broken into the Capitol, beaten police and security in the process, threated to kill the VP, are trying to reverse the result of the federal election and have reached the last barricade between them and Congress and are breaking it down. Just to have a quiet discussion and present a list of their grievances I'm sure.At the time, there was one person who was climbing through a window. The other people saw the gun and backed off.
Deadly force should be the last option, not the first.
I hope you and the other posters here defending Byrd will be as enthusiastic when other officers use deadly force, not just when they're killing Trump supporters.
The so-called "mob" did not even try to hurt anyone there.My assumption is that they would have been torn to pieces by the mob (minus 7 or 8 dead ones) since they were on the wrong side of that door to be safe.
No, you are wrong. No one was trying to assassinate anyone.She was trying to assassinate elected officials. We know because they said so.