• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

What do you consider a Biblical Church?

Richard T

Well-Known Member
Mar 25, 2018
3,155
2,019
traveling Asia
✟135,713.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Yes and I think its when there is proper order that this allows more freedom of the spirit. The church is being qualified and thus also being open to the full potential of the spirit without corruption.

I did not mean to tar Penticostals as I think this could happen in any church. But moreso those who commercialise or secularise the church that its hard to tell the difference.

To me a church should be fairly poor. The opposite should be happening. Instead of making gain for self or even a particular church. Rather the leaders and members should be giving of their own possessions and everyone is helping each other.

I think it shows how far we have drifted away that we think having wealth to the point its no different to secular society is perfectly ok.

I don't think they are standing around barring people. This is what someone said and it may be that they personally had an issue. Though like I said I thought they were a bit too showy.

The point is that this is what is happening. Unlike MacDonalds where you can walk into any resturant in the country and expect more or less the same thing. Today its like walking into a Macs and getting Kentucky or Berger King or some back street takeaway who is dishing up something hot and spicy lol.

Do you think that this is moreso today generally in that everything seems to be about credentials or not, ad hominums and appeals to authority. A celebrity age and where looks, position, associations and possessions are the measure of power disguised as success.

Yes it would seem a basic teachings like the Good Samaritan which is simple and obvious. Yet it seems it can be compromised and rationalised as that the church does not have to be so extreme in giving the shirt off their own back. Even half as much would increase help for the needy.

But also I think that the church leadership should be involved in all aspects of the communities life. Be able to give counsel in marriage and any issue of modern society and how to handle this in todays world. Not be left to be swept along by whatever idea comes along.

The fact is its hard to be a Christian today and its easy to be lured into secular norms. I think a big part of the overseers as shepherds is to minister and protect the church as a seperated family in the world but not of the world. Which is hard as it means sometimes going against popular beliefs.
I am glad you have thought on this. If you are a pastor or elder your church sounds good to me. Absolutely there opportunities to meet needs and be part of any community at least in the USA.
As to your question on titles and self promotion, even in Jesus' day the Pharisees and some others loved to be called Rabbi's even when the moment did not call for it. I suppose there is nothing new under the sun. Today the use of various forms of media have many promoting themselves. Trusting God for open doors and opportunities is the best way. Your gift, so to speak is what makes room for your. Though that Proverb is somewhat about money, but if you are gifted in God there will be opportunities. Daniel and others are proof of that. Few want to take the time like a Joseph to be seasoned in a tough season. They want to go right to the top without the character building.
 
  • Like
Reactions: stevevw
Upvote 0

Richard T

Well-Known Member
Mar 25, 2018
3,155
2,019
traveling Asia
✟135,713.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Yes and I think its when there is proper order that this allows more freedom of the spirit. The church is being qualified and thus also being open to the full potential of the spirit without corruption.

I did not mean to tar Penticostals as I think this could happen in any church. But moreso those who commercialise or secularise the church that its hard to tell the difference.

To me a church should be fairly poor. The opposite should be happening. Instead of making gain for self or even a particular church. Rather the leaders and members should be giving of their own possessions and everyone is helping each other.

I think it shows how far we have drifted away that we think having wealth to the point its no different to secular society is perfectly ok.

I don't think they are standing around barring people. This is what someone said and it may be that they personally had an issue. Though like I said I thought they were a bit too showy.

The point is that this is what is happening. Unlike MacDonalds where you can walk into any resturant in the country and expect more or less the same thing. Today its like walking into a Macs and getting Kentucky or Berger King or some back street takeaway who is dishing up something hot and spicy lol.

Do you think that this is moreso today generally in that everything seems to be about credentials or not, ad hominums and appeals to authority. A celebrity age and where looks, position, associations and possessions are the measure of power disguised as success.

Yes it would seem a basic teachings like the Good Samaritan which is simple and obvious. Yet it seems it can be compromised and rationalised as that the church does not have to be so extreme in giving the shirt off their own back. Even half as much would increase help for the needy.

But also I think that the church leadership should be involved in all aspects of the communities life. Be able to give counsel in marriage and any issue of modern society and how to handle this in todays world. Not be left to be swept along by whatever idea comes along.

The fact is its hard to be a Christian today and its easy to be lured into secular norms. I think a big part of the overseers as shepherds is to minister and protect the church as a seperated family in the world but not of the world. Which is hard as it means sometimes going against popular beliefs.
I am glad you have thought on this. If you are a pastor or elder your church sounds good to me. Absolutely there opportunities to meet needs and be part of any community at least in the USA.
As to your question on titles and self promotion, even in Jesus' day the Pharisees and some others loved to be called Rabbi's even when the moment did not call for it. I suppose there is nothing new under the sun. Today the use of various forms of media have many promoting themselves. Trusting God for open doors and opportunities is the best way. Your gift, so to speak is what makes room for your. Though that Proverb is somewhat about money, but if you are gifted in God there will be opportunities. Daniel and others are proof of that. Few want to take the time like a Joseph to be seasoned in a tough season. They want to go right to the top without the character building.
 
Upvote 0

Sir Joseph

Active Member
Site Supporter
Nov 18, 2018
171
182
Southwest
✟158,055.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
I shouldn't be surprised by the many, varied responses here that I've just read. Some are good but many are meaningless fluff that would apply to any false religion or secular organization. I expect any church to be loving, giving, and serving others in various ways, but that doesn't differentiate a biblical Christian church from an unbiblical one. I expect most of the misguided, liberal churches today would have many of the desired qualities that responses above advocate, but that doesn't make them biblical.

I travel full time and attend new, different churches regularly. That entails me going on-line, visiting a church's website, and determining whether it's a church I want to attend for the next 2 months or not. In my case, being a Bible believing evangelical Christian, I want a church that actually respects the faith's foundational scriptures - in other words, respects the Bible's authority.

Most churches tend to have some sort of "about" or "statement of beliefs" posted, but many leave out anything controversial or specific that might differentiate between being liberal or conservative in their beliefs. They don't want to define anything that could be considered offensive or unwelcoming to anyone. I try to avoid these churches because it usually means they're liberal.

What determines a biblical church for me is one that truly follows the Bible in its core beliefs. This automatically rules out many of the denominations and even separates the supposed evangelical protestant denominations. I find most get the Gospel message right, but it's a small minority of Christians and churches anymore that actually believe the Bible as God's authoritative, infallible Word - the foundational basis of their faith. To me, that means:

The church accepts the clearly written, literal Genesis 6-day/24 hr creation and flood accounts (vs evolution); Moses' authorship of the Pentateuch; the Israelite nation, exodus, and Red Sea crossing; other OT miracles; no women pastors leading the congregation; and a stated position against the abortion, LGBT, and gender blending culture. I find the ones that do that have no problem fulfilling the other appropriate church expectations.

In short, I think a Biblical church (and Christian) should actually believe the Bible, but polls show that only a small minority do anymore. The church body has succumbed to much of the world view's pressures, political correctness, and relative moral values by allegorizing or completely disregarding the parts of the Bible that they don't like. And sadly, even the seminaries are teaching this theology - starting with Genesis.
 
Upvote 0

PloverWing

Episcopalian
May 5, 2012
5,190
6,181
New Jersey
✟407,865.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
To me, that means:

The church accepts the clearly written, literal Genesis 6-day/24 hr creation and flood accounts (vs evolution); Moses' authorship of the Pentateuch; the Israelite nation, exodus, and Red Sea crossing; other OT miracles; no women pastors leading the congregation; and a stated position against the abortion, LGBT, and gender blending culture. I find the ones that do that have no problem fulfilling the other appropriate church expectations.

Thanks for the clarity of this statement. This is a set of beliefs held by a number of churches, and I think it's useful to have a name for it. "Biblical" is probably as good a name as any, as long as we all agree to use the word that way.

@Daniel Carlton , is this the definition of "Biblical" that you had in mind?
 
Upvote 0

Daniel Carlton

Active Member
Aug 6, 2025
59
34
England
Visit site
✟10,404.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Thanks for the clarity of this statement. This is a set of beliefs held by a number of churches, and I think it's useful to have a name for it. "Biblical" is probably as good a name as any, as long as we all agree to use the word that way.

@Daniel Carlton , is this the definition of "Biblical" that you had in mind?

It sounded similar to my description but just worded differently.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PloverWing
Upvote 0

OnceLostButNowFound

Active Member
Nov 29, 2023
61
23
33
USA
✟30,599.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
If it teaches the gospel, says that Jesus is Lord, to believe and adhere to every word in the Bible, and cracks down on sinful behavior while also being loving towards the congregation and welcoming to newcomers, then it's a Biblical church.
 
Upvote 0

prodromos

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Nov 28, 2003
23,802
14,251
59
Sydney, Straya
✟1,451,874.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
What is a biblical church to you? What are the must have or must not have to be considered a biblical church?

I will give my answer later on as I do not want to influence answers.
A biblical Church is one that predates the Bible.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: RileyG
Upvote 0

David Lamb

Well-Known Member
May 30, 2024
3,526
1,931
76
Paignton
✟79,429.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
A biblical Church is one that predates the Bible.
Very few if any individual churches predate the bible. And if one did, how would that make it a "biblical church?" Also, the age of a church does not guarantee its present soundness.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Strong in Him
Upvote 0

Yarddog

Senior Contributor
Site Supporter
Jun 25, 2008
16,932
4,272
Louisville, Ky
✟1,023,053.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
What is a biblical church to you? What are the must have or must not have to be considered a biblical church?

I will give my answer later on as I do not want to influence answers.
The presence of the Holy Spirit.
 
Upvote 0

Lukaris

Orthodox Christian
Site Supporter
Aug 3, 2007
8,875
3,224
Pennsylvania, USA
✟953,424.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
What is a biblical church to you? What are the must have or must not have to be considered a biblical church?

I will give my answer later on as I do not want to influence answers.
Knowing Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior ( John 1:1-18, John 3:16-21, John 14:6), God is a Trinity ( 1 John 5:7, Deuteronomy 6:4, John chapters 14,15, & 16, Salvation by grace & living it ( Ephesians 2:8-10, John 14:15-18), Prayer & alms giving ( Matthew 6:1-13, 1 Timothy 2:1-6), understanding the Lords commandments & the law fulfilled ( Romans 13:8-10) etc.
 
Upvote 0

seeking.IAM

A View From The Pew
Site Supporter
Feb 29, 2004
4,873
5,641
Indiana
✟1,149,931.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
I consider a Biblical church as one that preaches on the entire Bible such as following a lectionary as opposed to one that cherry-picks scriptures to meet a preconceived agenda declared in the name of "inspiration."
 
Upvote 0

prodromos

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Nov 28, 2003
23,802
14,251
59
Sydney, Straya
✟1,451,874.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
Very few if any individual churches predate the bible. And if one did, how would that make it a "biblical church?" Also, the age of a church does not guarantee its present soundness.
The Church had existed for a full generation before the first Gospel was written.
 
  • Like
Reactions: seeking.IAM
Upvote 0