I’m a little confused with this discussion, and I feel I’m missing an important point.
Being confused about a discussion on CF, is often expected.
The way I see it at this point is as follows: Angels are real and they visit people and help them.
This is one reason there is confusion.
People say things, and never use the Bible, especially on a sub-forum called
Christian Scriptures, where scriptures are required... and they spend their time on the thread making post after post, page after page, without using one single scripture.
They make claims, in other words.
Devils are real and they pretend to be angels of light and deceive people. People imagine things and think that they are getting divine guidance. Which thing is happening is not always clear. If you study the Scriptures carefully and find that there is no conflict with the “revelation” somebody has had, then one must decide what to do about it.
I was in one congregation where a good Christian man had a message from God that an important event was soon to happen. Everybody believed him and put a lot of work and money into preparations, including the man with the message. Nothing happened, but nothing went to waste that I know of. Was it like Jonah, and Nineveh repented? Only God knows, but the cooperation, good works, and devotion in action were all positive things. It wasn’t like people selling everything, because somebody said that the rapture would happen next week. Everybody could see that no real harm would be done if the message was not true, and nobody was angry afterwards.
One thing I know for sure is that God doesn’t play hide and seek. If you are a Christian and doing something contrary to God’s plan, He will make it clear, and you may not like how He does it. Anyway, I would like to know what I’m missing in this debate.
For one thing, Jerry, the thread was not made to argue about whether or not someone was visited by an angel of God, or an angel of Satan, but since the subject is 'Angels', and someone made the claim they were visited by God's angel, they should scripturally back it up. Especially since the claim was opposed with scripture.
So far they have not, and where the scriptures challenge their claim, they have nothing to say except repeat their claim, and basically say that one cannot see what they see, or know what they know... Like Jim Jones, and David Koresh did.
I hope you didn't miss that.
The other thing is, I am not interested in bouncing claims.
I don't argue against claims (it's customary on CF to fill a whole thread with them). I use scriptures against them, and if they are repeated without any scriptural support at all, I dismiss them.
So, I'm at this point waiting for a scripture. I asked, but got
this. Which basically says what?
So, you actually aren't the only one confused about this debate.
Whereas I thought this sub-forum was for
the interpretation and explanation (exegesis) of Bible books, chapters or verses. Which entails that scripture is provided with your explanation of the scripture for discussion and study. Or,
the study of the Bible and Scriptures through interpretation and translation, repeatedly I am confronted with persons who are just happy to throw their claims around on the thread, and declare that they are good to be acceptable.
Both Jesus, and the Statement of Purpose of this sub-forum, however, says "Not". I hope that helps.
If it did, perhaps you could go back and show me scripturally that angels "visit people and help them".
It's important to note too Jerry, the scripture do not support the view that certain scriptural topics aren't important so long as you believe others. Satan would have us believe we're good, just believing the milk of God's word.
However, we cannot have this view and at the same time agree with John 4:23, 24